Author Topic: Latest news on the search for Madeleine McCann  (Read 712418 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline imustpointout

Re: Latest news on the search for Madeleine McCann
« Reply #360 on: November 03, 2013, 05:22:17 PM »
8((()*/ Works for me.

But he wouldn't need to ask someone else for an article. If it refuted the Sunday Times in any way why has nobody got a copy of it?

read my lips - it was posted here by carly. Not my fault if you decided to ignore it.

I have a Times subsciption along with a lot of other people.

Offline imustpointout

Re: Latest news on the search for Madeleine McCann
« Reply #361 on: November 03, 2013, 05:24:16 PM »
I'm not, I'm commenting on you saying there is a second article that says things but you can neither produce the article or tell us what it said.

i can produce the article within 10 seconds

Dominic Kennedy
Last updated at 12:01AM, October 28 2013

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Latest news on the search for Madeleine McCann
« Reply #362 on: November 03, 2013, 05:24:30 PM »
read my lips - it was posted here by carly. Not my fault if you decided to ignore it.

I have a Times subsciption along with a lot of other people.

So you could go and find it now then. 8)--))

Offline imustpointout

Re: Latest news on the search for Madeleine McCann
« Reply #363 on: November 03, 2013, 05:25:04 PM »
So you could go and find it now then. 8)--))

i can produce the article within 10 seconds

Dominic Kennedy
Last updated at 12:01AM, October 28 2013

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Latest news on the search for Madeleine McCann
« Reply #364 on: November 03, 2013, 05:25:56 PM »
i can produce the article within 10 seconds

Dominic Kennedy
Last updated at 12:01AM, October 28 2013

Christmas is coming...

Offline imustpointout

Re: Latest news on the search for Madeleine McCann
« Reply #365 on: November 03, 2013, 05:28:34 PM »
Lyall
Re: It is claimed that Oakley's Report and e-fits were suppressed for 5 years?
Reply #6 on: October 27, 2013, 12:23:00 AM
Quote
Imustpointout 8((()*/ Thank you.

Do you forget thanking me for posting the first article before anyone else?

You can laugh all you like now


here you go - a link too http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2794.0

Benita

  • Guest
Re: Latest news on the search for Madeleine McCann
« Reply #366 on: November 03, 2013, 05:29:02 PM »
you didn't see it but you are commenting on things.

double beggars belief



@)(++(* @)(++(* eeh ya couldn't make it up  8-)(--)

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Latest news on the search for Madeleine McCann
« Reply #367 on: November 03, 2013, 05:34:32 PM »
Lyall
Re: It is claimed that Oakley's Report and e-fits were suppressed for 5 years?
Reply #6 on: October 27, 2013, 12:23:00 AM
Quote
Imustpointout 8((()*/ Thank you.

Do you forget thanking me for posting the first article before anyone else?

You can laugh all you like now


here you go - a link too http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2794.0

I didn't forget. If you don't want to post the second article, just tell us what it said. A summary. Mr Kennedy would want you to.

Offline imustpointout

Re: Latest news on the search for Madeleine McCann
« Reply #368 on: November 03, 2013, 05:38:42 PM »
But I will give you a hint - re-read the first article very carefully and you will notice how many mistakes and non quotes there are.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Latest news on the search for Madeleine McCann
« Reply #369 on: November 03, 2013, 05:40:34 PM »
Aw dont  worry Lyall, I know how frustrating it is to ask someone for a link and they refuse to provide it, here you go

Post 430

Still dont see any source quoted for the PJ having the efits years ago!!! As against the headlines HIDDEN for five years! Couldnt make it up...though the sentence says the PJ and SY had them for some years. I wonder what that means, I think its SAFE to say the efits were kept hidden for a few years at least, IF they were passed on eventually when SY got involved....at some stage anyway


http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2794.msg96154#msg96154


Edited for after thought
« Last Edit: November 03, 2013, 05:44:42 PM by Redblossom »

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Latest news on the search for Madeleine McCann
« Reply #370 on: November 03, 2013, 05:40:46 PM »

Kennedy's article begins with 'Five years have been wasted in the hunt for Madeleine McCann while pictures of the prime suspect in her abduction were suppressed.'

It doesn't sound like much of a change of tune.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2013, 06:38:22 PM by Joanne »

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Latest news on the search for Madeleine McCann
« Reply #371 on: November 03, 2013, 05:42:02 PM »
But I will give you a hint - re-read the first article very carefully and you will notice how many mistakes and non quotes there are.

I know that. As I said it's not what it said, it's that people had the guts to ask some questions... finally.

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Latest news on the search for Madeleine McCann
« Reply #372 on: November 03, 2013, 05:42:51 PM »
Aw dont  worry Lyall, I know how frustrating it is to ask someone for a link and they refuse to provide it, here you go

Post 430

Still dont see any source quoted for the PJ having the efits years ago!!! As against the headlines HIDDEN for five years! Couldnt make it up...though the sentence says the PJ and SY had them for some years.


http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2794.msg96154#msg96154

?{)(** Nice one Red.

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Latest news on the search for Madeleine McCann
« Reply #373 on: November 03, 2013, 05:46:57 PM »

All that teasing for this line?

The e-fits were in the possession of both Portuguese police and Scotland Yard for some years before this month's publication.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2013, 06:07:14 PM by Joanne »

Offline imustpointout

Re: Latest news on the search for Madeleine McCann
« Reply #374 on: November 03, 2013, 05:48:03 PM »
Aw dont  worry Lyall, I know how frustrating it is to ask someone for a link and they refuse to provide it, here you go

Post 430

Still dont see any source quoted for the PJ having the efits years ago!!! As against the headlines HIDDEN for five years! Couldnt make it up...though the sentence says the PJ and SY had them for some years. I wonder what that means, I think its SAFE to say the efits were kept hidden for a few years at least, IF they were passed on eventually when SY got involved....at some stage anyway


http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2794.msg96154#msg96154


Edited for after thought

drawing your own conclusions again red.

By the way red- you never did thank me for posting the subscription only Sunday Times article that you asked for.