Precisely what proof is there of abduction ?
No hyperbole please.
P.S. A man holding a child in his arms does not prove abduction.
How many times do you have to be told that there is neither proof of abduction, nor proof of death. In fact there is no proof at all what happened to Madeleine McCann. That is why there are inquiries proceeding at present. It seems quite ridiculous that you should even ask the question.
But there is clear evidence of the abduction or the PJ would not have been granted the permission to re-open the inquiry as substantial evidence was necessary for that procedure to occur.
The fact that you either cannot or will not deign to understand that simple fact is precisely what I referred to in my previous post.
The very fact that the inquiry by the Oporto team is now open with the focus on stranger abduction is proof of the existence of the evidence unless of course you are going to suggest that the Public Ministry and the Prosecutor General of Portugal are in on some kind of wild conspiracy.
And to be frank it is none of your business or mine what the evidence actually is. Under PT law it is not permitted to disclose that evidence to the public and I can fully understand that as it could clearly compromise the inquiry to do so and could even endanger the life of Madeleine, if as all decent people hope, she is still alive.
