Why did the McCanns reject Henri Exton's expertise ?

[Lyall]

It seems the two journos who wrote the story are well known for telling lies...as for bombshell..it has had no effect whatsoever...its just that as the McCanns are now in the clear posters with your agenda are desperate for any snippet to try and point guilt back at them...It hasn't worked

The articles were just the icing on the cake davel. It's plain to every journalist in the land the 10pm sighting was almost completely ignored from the moment it hit the UK papers in January 08.

You'll have noticed I'm sure that the papers lost interest in the e-fits and Redwood's "prime suspect" in about three days I think.

[Mr Gray]

The articles were just the icing on the cake davel. It's plain to every journalist in the land the 10pm sighting was almost completely ignored from the moment it hit the UK papers in January 08.

You'll have noticed I'm sure that the papers lost interest in the e-fits and Redwood's "prime suspect" in about three days I think.

the article has been completely ignored apart from a few forums

[Redblossom]

The articles were just the icing on the cake davel. It's plain to every journalist in the land the 10pm sighting was almost completely ignored from the moment it hit the UK papers in January 08.

You'll have noticed I'm sure that the papers lost interest in the e-fits and Redwood's "prime suspect" in about three days I think.

Bit  of a grand old mess isnt it....oh dear, oh well, and thats that!

[Lyall]

the article has been completely ignored apart from a few forums

I doubt it, but you're well aware journalists and editors have to be careful for obvious reasons.

And there's no rush, davel.

[Mr Gray]

I doubt it, but you're well aware journalists and editors have to be careful for obvious reasons.

And there's no rush, davel.

of course theres no rush..tick tock...slowly slowly catchee monkey as you like to say...and dream on dreamer ...as I like to say

[Lyall]

Bit  of a grand old mess isnt it....oh dear, oh well, and thats that!

Davel can spin his way out of it

(maybe...)

[Mr Gray]

Davel can spin his way out of it

(maybe...)

od course ...all you need is a change in govt and the mccanns will lose their protection...oh weve already had one 8-)(--)

[Redblossom]

Davel can spin his way out of it

(maybe...)

People might TRY miserably to spin truths but always will fail....cos it comes out always in the end

 

and this truth cant be swept under any carpet anywhere......ever.....eapecially as its so shocking and disgraceful


Oh well some TV beckons....laters


 

[Lyall]

of course theres no rush..tick tock...slowly slowly catchee monkey as you like to say...and dream on dreamer ...as I like to say

The questions raised in those articles are about the conduct of the campaign in 2008 and later, and nothing to do with what happened in Portugal.

They are legitimate questions, which may have legitimate answers for all we know but so far none have been forthcoming.

These are matters in the public interest when large sums are being spent by the police, and the fund is still requesting support from ordinary people.

It's legitimate journalism.

[Lyall]

People might TRY miserably to spin truths but always will fail....cos it comes out always in the end

 

and this truth cant be swept under any carpet anywhere......ever.....eapecially as its so shocking and disgraceful


Oh well some TV beckons....laters


 

I hope so, Red. There are many people who will have interesting stories to tell... one day.

[AnneGuedes]

I hope so, Red. There are many people who will have interesting stories to tell... one day.

One day, yes. And sooner than ever expected.

[AnneGuedes]

od course ...all you need is a change in govt and the mccanns will lose their protection...oh weve already had one 8-)(--)

Wishful thinking.

[AnneGuedes]

You'll have noticed I'm sure that the papers lost interest in the e-fits and Redwood's "prime suspect" in about three days I think.

Amazing.

[AnneGuedes]

That is for the police. 

I am sure that, under the circumstances, no member of this forum would wish to add to her parents anguish by continuing to "point the finger of suspicion" at them, without some actual credible evidence.

Nobody bothers to "point the finger of suspicion" at the McCanns. What for ?
People bother though to "point the finger of questioning" at the crime that their daughter was victim of. What happened to her ?

[ferryman]

On what basis was it wrong?

It failed to state that the efits had been in the possession of both UK and Portuguese police for some years.