Why did the McCanns reject Henri Exton's expertise ?

[Wonderfulspam]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2478087/Why-Madeleine-McCann-suspect-E-fits-kept-secret-5-years.html

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2760.0

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance_of_Madeleine_McCann

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2478087/Why-Madeleine-McCann-suspect-E-fits-kept-secret-5-years.html

http://m.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/madeleine-mccann-e-fit-pictures-overlooked-for-5-years/story-fnb64oi6-1226748119500

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/347672/Maddie-Crimewatch-pictures-kept-secret-for-five-years

http://www.thestar.ie/star/e-fit-of-maddie-kidnap-suspect-was-suppressed-five-years-ago-35302/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/10407664/Madeleine-McCann-critical-new-evidence-is-from-five-year-old-suppressed-report.html

[Carana]

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2760.0

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance_of_Madeleine_McCann

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2478087/Why-Madeleine-McCann-suspect-E-fits-kept-secret-5-years.html

http://m.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/madeleine-mccann-e-fit-pictures-overlooked-for-5-years/story-fnb64oi6-1226748119500

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/347672/Maddie-Crimewatch-pictures-kept-secret-for-five-years

http://www.thestar.ie/star/e-fit-of-maddie-kidnap-suspect-was-suppressed-five-years-ago-35302/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/10407664/Madeleine-McCann-critical-new-evidence-is-from-five-year-old-suppressed-report.html

Thanks for those links. What evidence is there that the journalists did anything more than crib on the original ST article?

[Lyall]

Thanks for those links. What evidence is there that the journalists did anything more than crib on the original ST article?

The Guardian also stated the efits were done in 2008.

[Carana]

The Guardian also stated the efits were done in 2008.

Thanks... Could you provide links?

[Lyall]

Thanks... Could you provide links?

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/oct/15/madeleine-mccann-same-name-efit-appeal-crimewatch?INTCMP=SRCH

 

[slartibartfast]

Thanks for those links. What evidence is there that the journalists did anything more than crib on the original ST article?

I suspect they did. The point is, they are all still online.

[Wonderfulspam]

The Guardian also stated the efits were done in 2008.

Channel 4. 7pm News 15th October.
 
"These are 2 e-fits of the same man. A man who may hold the key to Madeleine McCanns disappearance."

"They've been shut away in a private investigation file for 5 years."

"They were compiled from 2 witness accounts on the night Madeleine disappeared, but never handed over to the Portuguese investigation. Now British police are treating them with the utmost importance"


The Sunday Times article was published on 27th October.

Where could Channel 4 have got that information from before the ST published that article?

[Mr Gray]

The following quote is from The Australian.

"A UK Met Police spokesman said yesterday any withholding of the report was “not an issue for us” because they were not investigating the case at the time."

SHAME ON YOU SCOTLAND YARD!

I would also say that is sufficient confirmation the e-fits were witheld.

http://m.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/madeleine-mccann-e-fit-pictures-overlooked-for-5-years/story-fnb64oi6-1226748119500

  mCCannns say they gave the efits to the pj...so perhaps the pj sat on them

[Wonderfulspam]

  mCCannns say they gave the efits to the pj...so perhaps the pj sat on them

Maybe that b**tard Amaral hid them.

[Luz]

  mCCannns say they gave the efits to the pj...so perhaps the pj sat on them

Brilliant, blame the PJ. 


You never let me down 

P.S. It's a shame that nobody believes the McCann anymore.

[Mr Gray]

Brilliant, blame the PJ. 


You never let me down 

This is a clip from the telegraph article


Now the later sighting is being taken seriously. While DCI Redwood stressed that it could be a yet another innocent holidaymaker carrying his child, it is the key public line of inquiry, if only because of the absence of anything else. Yet it also means that what could be the key e-fit lay under wraps for several years. "It was passed to the Portuguese police at the time and for whatever reason they decided to nothing whatsoever with it," said one source close to the McCann investigation. "It was then handed to the Met two years ago, and they have now deemed it worthy of publication, but frankly it should have been out there a long time ago."


its not me its from an article in the telegraph

[jassi]

Maybe that b**tard Amaral hid them.

I really can't decide if that is a serious statement or not.

[Wonderfulspam]

I really can't decide if that is a serious statement or not.

I don't really do serious.

[jassi]

I don't really do serious.

I'm relieved to hear that 

[Luz]

This is a clip from the telegraph article


Now the later sighting is being taken seriously. While DCI Redwood stressed that it could be a yet another innocent holidaymaker carrying his child, it is the key public line of inquiry, if only because of the absence of anything else. Yet it also means that what could be the key e-fit lay under wraps for several years. "It was passed to the Portuguese police at the time and for whatever reason they decided to nothing whatsoever with it," said one source close to the McCann investigation. "It was then handed to the Met two years ago, and they have now deemed it worthy of publication, but frankly it should have been out there a long time ago."


its not me its from an article in the telegraph

The source close to the investigation being who? The known spin person they contracted for 70k to deplete all the real news in favour of constructed lies?!

So, the Met had the "important" e-fits, that could help find a live child and yet they chose to sit on them for 2 years?!!!!

At least the PJ final report was more inclined for a death than for an abduction, so time was not so important, but the Scotland Yard assumingly is looking for an abducted child that can be alive - what justifies it siding the suppression of information for 2 years?!