Author Topic: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!  (Read 343948 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Angelo222

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #1275 on: February 23, 2015, 10:56:10 AM »
8 year old daughter doesn't return home, you'd at least call the police, I'da thought, that'd be a start, but she didn't.

People who try to make excuses for the Ciprianos only weaken their own credibility imo.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #1276 on: February 23, 2015, 10:57:33 AM »
People who try to make excuses for the Ciprianos only weaken their own credibility imo.

Indeed, it's only McCann supporters who do.

Says it all really,
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #1277 on: February 23, 2015, 10:58:16 AM »
8 year old daughter doesn't return home, you'd at least call the police, I'da thought, that'd be a start, but she didn't.

Precisely.

Now how long was it before she raised the alarm over her daughter's disappearance ?

Offline Angelo222

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #1278 on: February 23, 2015, 11:07:58 AM »
Precisely.

Now how long was it before she raised the alarm over her daughter's disappearance ?

She didn't bother, she made the woeful excuse that her mobile had no credit but conveniently forgot to walk a short distance to tell the GNR officers at the nearby fair.  It was the owner of the shop who contacted the GNR when she became aware of Joana's disappearance.  Leonor still had time to fill her face with cakes though before turning up at the GNR office the next morning.
« Last Edit: February 23, 2015, 11:15:14 AM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Brietta

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #1279 on: February 23, 2015, 11:28:54 AM »
They endorse the murder of little girls through their support of the Ciprianos.

That's the kind of people they are.

I think "the kind of people they are" support the rule of law ... abhor the torture of prisoners ... and support the principle enshrined in "Innocent till proven guilty."

I think "they" prefer convictions for crime to be supported by evidence presented in a court of law.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #1280 on: February 23, 2015, 11:37:01 AM »
She didn't bother, she made the woeful excuse that her mobile had no credit but conveniently forgot to walk a short distance to tell the GNR officers at the nearby fair.  It was the owner of the shop who contacted the GNR when she became aware of Joana's disappearance.  Leonor still had time to fill her face with cakes though before turning up at the GNR office the next morning.

From old thread

Celia helps search and phones police approx        12.30/40
Leonora informs GNR near the church. who tells her to report it tomorrow
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #1281 on: February 23, 2015, 11:39:16 AM »
I think "the kind of people they are" support the rule of law ... abhor the torture of prisoners ... and support the principle enshrined in "Innocent till proven guilty."

I think "they" prefer convictions for crime to be supported by evidence presented in a court of law.

I'll post it again, because AnnaLor is here and she doesn't like what I have to say.

The Ciprianos were convicted, using evidence that was presented in a court of law.

If you want to support child murderers,well, good luck with that.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #1282 on: February 23, 2015, 11:47:58 AM »
Investigations conducted by the Judicial Police of Faro coordinated by Gonçalo Amaral did not reach any clear proof against Leonor and João Cipriano - just a theory, a story that the prosecutor José Pinheiro struggled to defend in court.
« Last Edit: February 23, 2015, 11:51:11 AM by DCI »
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Offline faithlilly

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #1283 on: February 23, 2015, 11:51:43 AM »
I think "the kind of people they are" support the rule of law ... abhor the torture of prisoners ... and support the principle enshrined in "Innocent till proven guilty."

I think "they" prefer convictions for crime to be supported by evidence presented in a court of law.


'Inherently good people' isn't that how Kate describes you ? The message being  that anyone with a modicum of reasoning ability who doesn't buy into the whole abduction charade is ' inherently bad'. Nice little propoganda trick but hardly subtle.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #1284 on: February 23, 2015, 11:54:37 AM »
Investigations conducted by the Judicial Police of Faro coordinated by Gonçalo Amaral did not reach any clear proof against Leonor and João Cipriano - just a theory, a story that the prosecutor José Pinheiro struggled to defend in court.

If the words are not your own would you mind posting a link to your quote ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #1285 on: February 23, 2015, 12:06:18 PM »
Investigations conducted by the Judicial Police of Faro coordinated by Gonçalo Amaral did not reach any clear proof against Leonor and João Cipriano - just a theory, a story that the prosecutor José Pinheiro struggled to defend in court.

Who better to make an informed decision on the innocence or otherwise of the Ciprianos?

A jury, which were shown all the evidence and reached a majority verdict of their guilt,

Or, some anonoymous rampant McCann enthusiasts, who only ever heard about the case because of Kate?

I'm sticking with The jury.
« Last Edit: February 23, 2015, 12:08:50 PM by Wonderfulspam »
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #1286 on: February 23, 2015, 12:07:54 PM »
If the words are not your own would you mind posting a link to your quote ?

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=3319.0
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Offline faithlilly

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #1287 on: February 23, 2015, 01:17:00 PM »
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #1288 on: February 23, 2015, 01:41:38 PM »
The prosecutor's case was certainly proved to the jury.

Not all the jury! Or judges, not sure.

Did you know, Leonor didn't sign her confession?

Inspectors Paulo Pereira Cristovao and Marques Bom signed the document saying it was the result of an “informal chat” that took place with Leonor Cipriano.
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Offline faithlilly

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #1289 on: February 23, 2015, 01:45:37 PM »
Not all the jury! Or judges, not sure.

Did you know, Leonor didn't sign her confession?

Inspectors Paulo Pereira Cristovao and Marques Bom signed the document saying it was the result of an “informal chat” that took place with Leonor Cipriano.

As a confession is worthless unless repeated in court I don't actually see your point.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?