Author Topic: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?  (Read 52386 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sadie

Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #45 on: November 04, 2013, 05:11:43 PM »
how you find my posts is of no interest to me and even less to the other members of the forum. IF you must spout off do it in pm rather than continually pollute threads.

N
I agree with Davel.  I find you very anti Mccann.  Very biased.

But it was good hearing some pleasant words from you for a change 8((()*/

Offline sadie

Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #46 on: November 04, 2013, 05:17:40 PM »
Fortunately more and more people are starting to open their eyes to this shameful case of obfuscation and lies.

It's high time that those that are guilty, at least of making money over a poor child's fate, to be finally unmasked.
I couldn't agree more.

So many lies and so much obfuscation.  Do you know any liars Luz?  @)(++(*



And as for making money out of it, the businesses that have built up by selling nasty books of lies etc. on the backs of missing children ARE APALLING.

Help us to unmask them.  The liars and the moneymakers.............Purleaze

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #47 on: November 04, 2013, 05:18:55 PM »
Absolutely ! At least the e-fits could provide a double face, like Janus, to Tannerman who, in spite of classic shoes, dark in color, with a heel perhaps a bit higher than normal and a white pyjama with little flowers or perhaps little birds and a frill.... conveniently had none !

Don't forget the hair Anne,

But, I mean, I think, so the things that I’m happy, that are still in my head, that still stick in my head is the hair and it was longer, it was sort of longish and, erm, I don’t know how to (inaudible), but each, each, almost the hair was long, the bits of hair were long, so it was long into the neck, you know, sort of in, when people have a number one or whatever at the back and it’s shaved, not shaved up, but, you know, sort of layered up, this was more long into the neck, so sort of long, each, each individual hair was long, erm, and dark, it was sort of quite dark and glossy, that sticks in my head.  And sort of the dark, dark clothes and quite billowy, not billowy clothes, but quite baggy, sort of they seemed, erm, not ill fitting but quite baggy clothes, like not jeans, but trousers sort of not Chinos but not Farrahs either, but sort of baggy’ish sort of ill fitting more than.  And they’re the bits that I remember quite vividly sort of”.


  'And they’re the bits that I remember quite vividly sort of'
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #48 on: November 04, 2013, 05:20:28 PM »
Absolutely ! At least the e-fits could provide a double face, like Janus, to Tannerman who, in spite of classic shoes, dark in color, with a heel perhaps a bit higher than normal and a white pyjama with little flowers or perhaps little birds and a frill.... conveniently had none !

it makes no sense whatsoever to have hidden them.....a man seen ONTHE NIGHT at the right time...but vicky beckham and spottyman released 2009, both not there on the night and neither carrying any child
« Last Edit: November 04, 2013, 05:22:18 PM by Redblossom »

Offline sadie

Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #49 on: November 04, 2013, 05:24:45 PM »
Don't forget the hair Anne,

But, I mean, I think, so the things that I’m happy, that are still in my head, that still stick in my head is the hair and it was longer, it was sort of longish and, erm, I don’t know how to (inaudible), but each, each, almost the hair was long, the bits of hair were long, so it was long into the neck, you know, sort of in, when people have a number one or whatever at the back and it’s shaved, not shaved up, but, you know, sort of layered up, this was more long into the neck, so sort of long, each, each individual hair was long, erm, and dark, it was sort of quite dark and glossy, that sticks in my head.  And sort of the dark, dark clothes and quite billowy, not billowy clothes, but quite baggy, sort of they seemed, erm, not ill fitting but quite baggy clothes, like not jeans, but trousers sort of not Chinos but not Farrahs either, but sort of baggy’ish sort of ill fitting more than.  And they’re the bits that I remember quite vividly sort of”.


  'And they’re the bits that I remember quite vividly sort of'
Jane, bless her, is a bit like me.  She doesn't express herself very clearly, but she is genuine .  Like me.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #50 on: November 04, 2013, 05:28:07 PM »
Don't forget the hair Anne,

But, I mean, I think, so the things that I’m happy, that are still in my head, that still stick in my head is the hair and it was longer, it was sort of longish and, erm, I don’t know how to (inaudible), but each, each, almost the hair was long, the bits of hair were long, so it was long into the neck, you know, sort of in, when people have a number one or whatever at the back and it’s shaved, not shaved up, but, you know, sort of layered up, this was more long into the neck, so sort of long, each, each individual hair was long, erm, and dark, it was sort of quite dark and glossy, that sticks in my head.  And sort of the dark, dark clothes and quite billowy, not billowy clothes, but quite baggy, sort of they seemed, erm, not ill fitting but quite baggy clothes, like not jeans, but trousers sort of not Chinos but not Farrahs either, but sort of baggy’ish sort of ill fitting more than.  And they’re the bits that I remember quite vividly sort of”.


  'And they’re the bits that I remember quite vividly sort of'

And after  all that observation and all the rest, even noticed he had no creases in his trousers.....what a hawk

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #51 on: November 04, 2013, 07:14:30 PM »
And after  all that observation and all the rest, even noticed he had no creases in his trousers.....what a hawk
?{)(**

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #52 on: November 04, 2013, 07:18:18 PM »
Don't forget the hair Anne,

But, I mean, I think, so the things that I’m happy, that are still in my head, that still stick in my head is the hair and it was longer, it was sort of longish and, erm, I don’t know how to (inaudible), but each, each, almost the hair was long, the bits of hair were long, so it was long into the neck, you know, sort of in, when people have a number one or whatever at the back and it’s shaved, not shaved up, but, you know, sort of layered up, this was more long into the neck, so sort of long, each, each individual hair was long, erm, and dark, it was sort of quite dark and glossy, that sticks in my head.  And sort of the dark, dark clothes and quite billowy, not billowy clothes, but quite baggy, sort of they seemed, erm, not ill fitting but quite baggy clothes, like not jeans, but trousers sort of not Chinos but not Farrahs either, but sort of baggy’ish sort of ill fitting more than.  And they’re the bits that I remember quite vividly sort of”.


  'And they’re the bits that I remember quite vividly sort of'
I sort of forgot you know that sort of hairish bit !

Offline Miro

Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #53 on: November 04, 2013, 07:41:40 PM »
So I've read this thread with steadily mounting disbelief, but I'm not sure why (my disbelief steadily mounted).

It's just the same old, same old from most posters.

Of course the McCanns didn't release that e-fit.

They had no remit or authority to do so.

This efit (of a man seen carrying a child in the vicinity of apartment 5a on the night of the crime) was delivered to the McCanns something like 3 months after the original investigation that exonerated the McCanns had been shelved!

What if that man turns out to be an innocent holidaymaker carrying his child back to an apartment, same as the man Jane Tanner saw turned out to be?

Where would the McCanns stand releasing an efit of an innocent holiday-maker or Portuguese resident on evening May 3rd, after the original investigation had been shelved?  No doubt, the self-righteous bile now being churned out by the usual suspects would, instead, accuse the McCanns of fingering an innocent man.

And another question.  Mr Smith was billed by Amaral as the crucial witness who would cement the case and prove the culpability of the McCanns.

Why did not his team trouble to take an e-fit from Mr Smith?  They did of the man Jane Tanner saw ...

I can only reiterate, that surely any parent would want any e-fit released of any potential lead / suspect, be it 1 e-fit, 2, 3 , 4 50 etc etc

Why oh why would you not want all leads followed up........however many e-fits

Its this type of behaviour I struggle with and I think many do....it doesn't seem natural for the circumstance..........are the McCanns that different form 80% of reactions ?  Its this type of thing that turns opinion against them imho .............

They could make a clear statement about the e-fit, would be natural to do so ;  ?

CPN

  • Guest
Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #54 on: November 04, 2013, 09:02:51 PM »
An earlier thread - http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2822.0 - asked: "Has support of the McCanns increased or decreased over the last 6½ years??" and the subsequent posts and the poll itself were very interesting.  It could perhaps be worth putting it among the polls section.  As it stands at the  minute, 23 voted, with 69.6% saying support had decreased and 17.4% saying it had increased. (the rest were that it had stayed the same or they didn't know)

Certainly from posts I have read elsewhere, fewer people seem to be supportive of the McCanns since the recent revelations in and after CrimeWatch

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #55 on: November 04, 2013, 09:07:15 PM »
An earlier thread - http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2822.0 - asked: "Has support of the McCanns increased or decreased over the last 6½ years??" and the subsequent posts and the poll itself were very interesting.  It could perhaps be worth putting it among the polls section.  As it stands at the  minute, 23 voted, with 69.6% saying support had decreased and 17.4% saying it had increased. (the rest were that it had stayed the same or they didn't know)

Certainly from posts I have read elsewhere, fewer people seem to be supportive of the McCanns since the recent revelations in and after CrimeWatch

I haven't noticed one person on this forum who has changed their opinion in the slightest...

CPN

  • Guest
Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #56 on: November 04, 2013, 09:13:46 PM »
I haven't noticed one person on this forum who has changed their opinion in the slightest...

I said "from posts I have read elsewhere", not here.  If I was being davel, I would add "learn to read properly"!!!

Rachel Granada

  • Guest
Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #57 on: November 04, 2013, 09:16:25 PM »
An earlier thread - http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2822.0 - asked: "Has support of the McCanns increased or decreased over the last 6½ years??" and the subsequent posts and the poll itself were very interesting.  It could perhaps be worth putting it among the polls section.  As it stands at the  minute, 23 voted, with 69.6% saying support had decreased and 17.4% saying it had increased. (the rest were that it had stayed the same or they didn't know)

Certainly from posts I have read elsewhere, fewer people seem to be supportive of the McCanns since the recent revelations in and after CrimeWatch

Where are some cites to these posts that you have read "elsewhere" to back up your claim?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #58 on: November 04, 2013, 09:19:41 PM »
I said "from posts I have read elsewhere", not here.  If I was being davel, I would add "learn to read properly"!!!

Well... having looked at several other sites I don't see anyone changing their mind.
its only a tiny, tiny percentage of the population who post and I think our ideas are fairly fixed and it would take a lot to cause a change in mind. The overwhelmingly vast majority of the public don't follow the case IMO

Offline Kazcutt

Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #59 on: November 04, 2013, 09:22:41 PM »
TomWinnifrith.com

CRIMEWATCH, KATE & GERRY MCCANN, MADDY, MI5

Kate & Gerry McCann – my sympathy is diminishing rapidly

Sunday 3 November 2013

- Tom Winnifrith

I have written before about the McCann parents. Losing a child must be an unimaginable horror but my sympathy was, even two weeks ago, greatly diminished by the way they had used funds raised to help in the search to silence their critics with legal threats and action and by their apparent love of being on TV and more. As of this week I am afraid that my sympathy almost disappeared.

The Crimewatch special of ten days ago claimed to have big new evidence. I am not sure that it did but I was prepared to give it the benefit of the doubt. Whatever my private views on the chances of finding Maddy alive those who loved her must be allowed to cling to hope.

However it has since emerged that the new evidence actually emerged five years ago thanks to a report compiled by ex MI5 officers paid for by the Mccann’s foundation funded by members of the public (actually it is a limited company which is odd in itself) But the report was also critical of the McCann parents and their friends and so foundation money was used to suppress it with the threat of legal action. Is that really what Maddy well-wishers would have wanted?

It has only now emerged, with the trail five years colder, because the Old Bill have forced it into the public domain. They have done this to justify the millions of quid of public money being spent on this new enquiry, something that has only taken place because of lobbying by Kate & Gerry.

So when Kate McCann blubbers on our TV screens asking for us to help use this NEW evidence I cannot say that I am blubbering with her.

The affaire McCann has become an unpleasant and costly circus. It is time to draw a line.
http://tomwinnifrith.com/articles/4057/ ... ng-rapidly


I'm rying to figure out why they wouldn't show the efits could it have been they were not allowed until the case was reopened? That Portugal law is so complex there has to be a reason why .maybe we will be told in the future