Author Topic: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?  (Read 52351 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Aiofe

  • Guest
Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #225 on: November 09, 2013, 04:27:28 PM »
This is the legal position for Dctors, none of which flows from the Children Act as amended. It is professional guidance as I stated. It is not part of the criminal Law:

http://careers.bmj.com/careers/advice/view-article.html?id=20007924

All doctors have a duty to report concerns that a child may be at risk of abuse or neglect, even if their work is with adult patients, says new guidance from the General Medical Council.[1]

Niall Dickson, the GMC’s chief executive, said that doctors need not worry that the regulator would “come after them” as long as they followed the guidance and took action through the proper channels.

Paediatricians have shunned child protection work after high profile cases in which some have been hauled up before the regulator after complaints by parents. Two paediatricians with an international reputation, Roy Meadow and David Southall, were ordered to be struck off the medical register but eventually had the decisions quashed on appeal.

The guidance, to be sent to more than 230 000 doctors in the United Kingdom, comes from a working party whose establishment was announced when Southall was restored to the register in May 2010.[2] Paediatricians were outraged that one of the group’s members was Penny Mellor, a parents’ advocate they accused of orchestrating a campaign of complaints against child protection doctors, but she stepped down after Southall threatened a High Court challenge to her appointment.[3]

The GMC’s chairman, Peter Rubin, said that he could see how doctors who worked with adults could overlook child protection concerns. But a patient’s chaotic lifestyle, alcohol or drug misuse, or “serious mental health issues” could lead to worries about the welfare of children in the home.

The guidance outlines the advice doctors should take and how they should raise their concerns with child protection colleagues and agencies. It states, “Taking action will be justified, even if it turns out that the child or young person is not at risk of, or suffering, abuse or neglect, as long as the concerns are honestly held and reasonable, and the doctor takes action through appropriate channels.”

Aiofe

  • Guest
Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #226 on: November 09, 2013, 04:29:13 PM »
This is the professional position for Nurses- again, not flowing from the Children Act itself, but from adminstrative law.

http://www.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/78583/002045.pdf

Offline jassi

Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #227 on: November 09, 2013, 08:19:53 PM »
Are we being spammed again ?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Aiofe

  • Guest
Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #228 on: November 10, 2013, 03:22:03 AM »
Just a note to say the BFB has not backed up her incorrect postings about reporting abuse after I posted the professional guidelines. And to think that she was haranguing me for cites earlier!

Offline BigFatBlonde

Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #229 on: November 10, 2013, 07:53:10 PM »
Alfie shhhh  @)(++(*

N

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #230 on: November 10, 2013, 07:56:46 PM »
Alfie shhhh  @)(++(*

N

Should be shhhd for good.......for his disgusting antics today....but he will be back....tomorrow...no doubt defending his disgraceful actions with some pathetic argument LOL

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #231 on: November 10, 2013, 08:07:53 PM »
Where's Aiofe gone to ? I missed out on what happened.

He posted a link to a blog that had  peoples user ids from an old forum called the 3as side by side with their  real life names outed ...not sure where they came from, but was out of order... And boasted you could get thier occupations  phone numbers and other info....s..m behviour afaiac for someone who asks of others "is this honourable behaviour"? LOL




Offline faithlilly

Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #232 on: November 10, 2013, 10:01:28 PM »
He posted a link to a blog that had  peoples user ids from an old forum called the 3as side by side with their  real life names outed ...not sure where they came from, but was out of order... And boasted you could get thier occupations  phone numbers and other info....s..m behviour afaiac for someone who asks of others "is this honourable behaviour"? LOL

And he wasn't banned ! Remarkable !
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #233 on: November 10, 2013, 10:12:52 PM »
And he wasn't banned ! Remarkable !

Maybe mods dont realise hes a previouslybanned (afew times) poster who did exactly the same thing last time they were banned.....for that and or other stuff,heyho debunker sappie sepee  or whatever it was LOL and now aiofe clown

Theyhad no business putting up a link to make a point...ergo their purpose was to publicise peoples real ids...that were illegally  harvested from some place iirc some petition..... maliciously used to  intimdate....inthe guise of some "argument".... Just another  joke bully  troll you know....
 8((()*/




« Last Edit: November 10, 2013, 10:15:47 PM by Redblossom »

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #234 on: November 10, 2013, 10:16:38 PM »
Maybe mods dont realise hes a previouslybanned (afew times) poster who did exactly the same thing last time they were banned.....for that and or other stuff,heyho debunker sappie sepee  or whatever it was LOL and now aiofe clown

Theyhad no business putting up a link to make a point...ergo their purpose was to publicise peoples real ids...that were illegally  harvested from some place iirc some petition..... maliciously used to  intimdate....inthe guise of some "argument".... Just another  joke bully  troll you know....
 8((()*/
Remarkable indeed ! How many times will the nurse have to strike ?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #235 on: November 10, 2013, 10:45:52 PM »
Remarkable indeed ! How many times will the nurse have to strike ?

Many it seems Anne. Although if intimidation is all they have left in their bag of tricks it seems we have the upper hand.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #236 on: November 26, 2013, 07:59:57 AM »
There's a facebook page that I lurk on that had in the region of 2,000 likes before crime watch. It's nearly 16,000 now.

It's an open group so you can read it without joining. I've never joined it as I find some of the stuff on there very distasteful


." Detectives are monitoring the internet for vile messages about the couple after a Facebook group targeting the pair attracted 11,000 members."

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/346131/Sick-internet-trolls-target-Kate-and-Gerry-McCann-after-Crimewatch-special



I could never understand how this group had so many members..now I understand. it has a link where if you join it adds all your facebook friends. that means that one person joining could add a hundred to their list..


On the right hand side of this page......>>>> there is a little box option to ''+ add people to the group''. Please feel free to add your facebook contacts in here. Thanks Admin.



« Last Edit: November 26, 2013, 08:11:57 AM by davel »

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #237 on: November 26, 2013, 08:09:53 AM »


Morning davel.

Why are you bumping my post?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #238 on: November 26, 2013, 08:12:57 AM »
have a look now ive edited it. The support for the page is not as it seems

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: Has the McCann's Actions Turned a Supportive Public Against Them ?
« Reply #239 on: November 26, 2013, 08:49:11 AM »
have a look now ive edited it. The support for the page is not as it seems

I came across that group because a Facebook friend is a member. I've not been added, nor has she invited me....

Do you mean that if a friend of mine became a member, I would automatically be added or that poeple can choose to invite their friends, who can then choose to join or not?