Author Topic: Why didnt the portuguese police arrest the mccanns ... after the dogs findings  (Read 65540 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Lyall

  • Guest
Its an evolving science means it is not supported by scientific  evidence...again..what do the alerts prove...try sweet fa

That's exactly what Anthony's attorney said ?{)(**

Offline Wonderfulspam

you seem to rate your opinion and I rate mine...you accuse the MccAnns of being child beaters with no evidence yet cant accept criticism of amamral when there is a plethora of evidence...thats why I question your credibility...then when questioned you get angry...so it would appear you are not confident in your own ability

.you accuse the MccAnns of being child beaters

No I didn't.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Why should a suggestion require evidence?

Abduction as a claim appears to require none.

And just who the f*** do you think you are to be judging my credibility

Ther is evidence of abduction but no proof...do you understand the meaning of evidence...your credibility is decreasing

ferryman

  • Guest
Why a canine search in a place (the villa) Madeleine never lived?

Why a search following in a place (the gym) Madeleine never went near?

Why a line-up of cars that included 7 vehicles owned or driven by people never arguidos in the investigation?

I've barely scratched the surface ...

Offline Mr Gray

That's exactly what Anthony's attorney said ?{)(**

 you still havent answered the question

Lyall

  • Guest
Really need the head banging smilie on here.

It's a science. A science that was examined in American courtrooms before the evidence could be used in trials.


Offline LagosBen

It's a science. A science that was examined in American courtrooms before the evidence could be used in trials.

Don't you read replies?

Lyall

  • Guest
you still havent answered the question

I don't need to. The question was answered by pretrial examination in American courtrooms: alerts are scientific, at least according to Florida and Michigan. If they weren't the evidence would never be allowed in trials.

Lyall

  • Guest

Offline Mr Gray

It's a science. A science that was examined in American courtrooms before the evidence could be used in trials.

Oh dear ..you still haven't answered the question..and its not a science..its an evolving science,,guess who told me

Offline Mr Gray

I don't need to. The question was answered by pretrial examination in American courtrooms: alerts are scientific, at least according to Florida and Michigan. If they weren't the evidence would never be allowed in trials.

 basically its bo888cks and until you can come up with some corroboration that's all it is

Offline LagosBen

Always 8((()*/

But do you understand them? 8-)(--)

Lyall

  • Guest
basically its bo888cks and until you can come up with some corroboration that's all it is

Scientists are busy teaching computers to do the same thing dogs do, so it is most definitely not bo888cks: it's science.

Doesn't Mr Amaral say he ordered such a machine in 2007?

Lyall

  • Guest
But do you understand them? 8-)(--)

Oh yes. I have answered ?>)()<

ferryman

  • Guest
Scientists are busy teaching computers to do the same thing dogs do, so it is most definitely not bo888cks: it's science.

Doesn't Mr Amaral say he ordered such a machine in 2007?

The STU100.

Stopped by customs.

Eyewash invented by Amaral, no doubt from Grime's profile, where he makes reference to the STU100