Author Topic: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits  (Read 90543 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #135 on: December 22, 2013, 11:38:48 AM »
What possible logical reason could there be in not displaying efits of the man suspected of 'abducting' your precious child, the child you have encouraged the rest of the world to look for, pray for, remember & don't forget about?

 because they are being displayed by SY . The  McCannns don't owe you or anyone else an explanation

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #136 on: December 22, 2013, 11:49:11 AM »
because they are being displayed by SY . The  McCannns don't owe you or anyone else an explanation

Oh I see they've got you to answer for them instead. Lucky them & us.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #137 on: December 22, 2013, 11:51:49 AM »
We know that the e-fit was not produced until after the end of January 2008 because Mr Smith said in his statement of that date that he had not participated in the production of any e-fit.

If it was produced after August 4th 2008, there was no official investigation, and therefore no context for the release of an e-fit of someone carrying an child in close proximity to apartment 5a, at just about the time Madeleine is known to have been abducted.

Then the Portuguese re-opened the investigation and there was a proper context for release of the efit.

The e-fit was duly released.

E-fits in the possession of police for years before the crimewatch programme

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #138 on: December 22, 2013, 12:01:07 PM »
We know that the e-fit was not produced until after the end of January 2008 because Mr Smith said in his statement of that date that he had not participated in the production of any e-fit.

If it was produced after August 4th 2008, there was no official investigation, and therefore no context for the release of an e-fit of someone carrying an child in close proximity to apartment 5a, at just about the time Madeleine is known to have been abducted.

Then the Portuguese re-opened the investigation and there was a proper context for release of the efit.

The e-fit was duly released.

E-fits in the possession of police for years before the crimewatch programme

But it was fine to release pictures of creepyman because he wasn't near the apartment.

Of course it all makes sense now.

Praise be to God that your here ferryman, you really are an asset to the McCanns.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #139 on: December 22, 2013, 12:06:48 PM »
But it was fine to release pictures of creepyman because he wasn't near the apartment.

Of course it all makes sense now.

Praise be to God that your here ferryman, you really are an asset to the McCanns.

The e-fit produced from Jane Tanner's sighting was produced while there was live, on-going police enquiry.

The Smith e-fit was in the possession of police for years before the crimewatch programme.

I would think I've nailed the reason why the police did not release the Smith e-fit before now.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #140 on: December 22, 2013, 12:09:51 PM »
There's nothing mysterious about this case. It's quite simple, a young innocent beautiful child tragically died and her death was covered up. The dogs discovered this whatever anyone claims to the contrary. And people have been played as fools/pawns which is quite easy to do. The hard part about this case is where they hid the body and the church would be my first suspicion or that guy who gave them the keys - what was his name oh yeah John Geraghty. He needs to be questioned. Where's his statement? The Renault car was stored at his house for Christ's sake.

--edited out inappropriate comment --

Kate & Gerry had nothing to do with it. They said so & so does Clarence Mitchell & that should be sufficient proof.
If you continue to poor scorn on the McCanns you are running the risk of being branded a child sex offender by those loving compassionate members of the McCann support group.
« Last Edit: December 22, 2013, 03:06:54 PM by Sherlock Holmes »
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #141 on: December 22, 2013, 12:24:26 PM »
The e-fit produced from Jane Tanner's sighting was produced while there was live, on-going police enquiry.

The Smith e-fit was in the possession of police for years before the crimewatch programme.

I would think I've nailed the reason why the police did not release the Smith e-fit before now.


Creepyman. Not Tannerman.
I can understand the confusion because there really was an abundance of creepy looking perverts lurking in the vicinity of the Ocean Club around the time.
It was like some kind of creepy perverts annual general meeting had coincided with the McCanns holiday plans.
Tragic.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #142 on: December 22, 2013, 12:53:10 PM »

The 'Victoria Beckham' Lookalike Suspect.

Press Conference 06 August 2009.

Produced & displayed while there was NO live, on-going police enquiry.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbleCtwbzYY&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hw6tAlflMj0&feature=player_embedded



Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #143 on: December 22, 2013, 02:22:03 PM »

Spottyman.

6th May 2009.

Produced & displayed while there was NO live, on-going police enquiry.

The creepy crater faced man was awarded a 'spot' on Channel 4 Cutting Edge documentary 'Madeleine Was Here' aswell as coverage in all the major tabloids.

Then around the 21st May 2009 Spottyman's boil burst & Raymond Hewlitt had stolen both his thunder & Madeleine.






Christian Brueckner Fan Club

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #144 on: December 22, 2013, 02:34:37 PM »
You forgot Toothyman..
I always wonder what kind of "artist" had the courage to produce such grotesque sketches  pretending to be e-fits.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #145 on: December 22, 2013, 02:38:32 PM »
You forgot Toothyman..
I always wonder what kind of "artist" had the courage to produce such grotesque sketches  pretending to be e-fits.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Sherlock Holmes

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #146 on: December 22, 2013, 03:05:28 PM »
What possible logical reason could there be in not displaying efits of the man suspected of 'abducting' your precious child, the child you have encouraged the rest of the world to look for, pray for, remember & don't forget about?

There may or may not have been a good reason.

But my post was in relation to Icabod's suggestion that the McCanns could have been clearer to us as to their intentions with regard to the e-fit saga.

So let's say the McCanns came forward and gave their account.

Would that satisfy everyone? Would we all accept their explanation?

An answer in a case like this usually just gives rise to another set of questions, so what would be the point?
« Last Edit: December 22, 2013, 03:09:38 PM by Sherlock Holmes »

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #147 on: December 22, 2013, 03:13:44 PM »
There may or may not have been a good reason.

But my post was in relation to Icabod's suggestion that the McCanns could have been clearer to us as to their intentions with regard to the e-fit saga.

So let's say the McCanns came forward and gave their account.

Would that satisfy everyone? Would we all accept their explanation?

An answer in a case like this usually just gives rise to another set of questions, so what would be the point?

It's very difficult to see what possible legitimate reason they could give other than 'It was Gerry & that's why we hid them'.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline pathfinder73

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #148 on: December 22, 2013, 03:16:09 PM »
Kate & Gerry had nothing to do with it. They said so & so does Clarence Mitchell & that should be sufficient proof.
If you continue to poor scorn on the McCanns you are running the risk of being branded a child sex offender by those loving compassionate members of the McCann support group.

Sometimes you need to ruffle a few feathers to get to the truth. Kate believes that Tannerman and Smithman are the same man.

"The police did not appear to feel that Jane’s sighting in Rua Dr Agostinho da Silva and the man and child reported by the Irish holidaymakers in Rua da Escola Primária were related. They seem to have concluded that these were in all likelihood two different men carrying two different children (if, they implied, these two men actually existed at all). The only reason for their scepticism appeared to be an unexplained time lapse between the two sightings. They didn’t dovetail perfectly. To me the similarities seem far more significant than any discrepancy in timing.
Every time I read these independent statements in the files (and neither could have been influenced by the other, remember – Jane’s description had not been released to the public before the Irish witnesses made their statements), I am staggered by how alike they are, almost identical in parts[/b]. As a lawyer once said to me, apropos another matter, ‘One coincidence, two coincidences – maybe they’re still coincidences. Any more than that and it stops being coincidence.’ (Ask the dogs Sandra)
Who knows why there was a forty-five-minute gap between the two sightings, or where this man might have been in between? I long ago stopped trying to come up with answers because I don’t think I need to. If the child was Madeleine – and in four years, no father has ever come forward to say it was him and his daughter – why would we assume he would be behaving normally or logically? There is nothing normal about stealing a little girl from her bed, so why should his subsequent actions be predictable? The abductor would hardly have been expecting to see Jane walking towards him as he escaped, let alone have anticipated that Gerry would be standing talking round the corner. Whatever plan was in his mind, he might well have been forced by these near misses to change it pretty quickly."

The father has come forward since the book but it hasn't changed anything in regards to Tannerman. You would think Smithman would be their top priority now but alas it's not to be.

« Last Edit: December 22, 2013, 03:52:05 PM by Sherlock Holmes »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #149 on: December 22, 2013, 03:18:01 PM »
It's very difficult to see what possible legitimate reason they could give other than 'It was Gerry & that's why we hid them'.

has it occurred to you that if it was Gerry...why would  they hire investigators to get the efit drawn up in the first place...theres no logical reason