Statistically...what are the chances that Maddie was abducted..

[Benice]

People can make up their own minds about the woman who you appear to be defending who was convicted of murdering her own child and who lied by claiming that she had mysteriously disappeared.

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id176.html

A little background reading on the mother and her brother who she was having an incestuous relationship with. And check out the background of the child. The mother didn't even bother to take her to school on her first day. Nice people, eh?

She seems to have lied about most things. But why would a woman who murders her own child tell the truth?

Do you know that  the court didn't believe the claim of incest -  and it was not accepted by them as the motive?




 

[Mr Gray]

Do you know that  the court didn't believe the claim of incest -  and it was not accepted by them as the motive?




 

 J Arthur Rob doesn't seem to have a clue what is and isn't real....

[Mr Gray]

People can make up their own minds about the woman who you appear to be defending who was convicted of murdering her own child and who lied by claiming that she had mysteriously disappeared.

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id176.html

A little background reading on the mother and her brother who she was having an incestuous relationship with. And check out the background of the child. The mother didn't even bother to take her to school on her first day. Nice people, eh?

She seems to have lied about most things. But why would a woman who murders her own child tell the truth?

I'm not defending the woman I am defending the truth...she was beaten in custody by the PJ ...that is a fact and is in no doubt...you simply run away from the truth

[stephen25000]

I'm not defending the woman I am defending the truth...she was beaten in custody by the PJ ...that is a fact and is in no doubt...you simply run away from the truth

The thread in reference to this CONVICT is elsewhere.

HER CONVICTION STILL STANDS.

[Redblossom]

The thread in reference to this CONVICT is elsewhere.

HER CONVICTION STILL STANDS.

Its pathetic that some argue she must hve been tortured or coercedinto making a confession in the first place....whch she did in sept 04 but then she was tortured and coerced into making another confession in  october 2004 and then have another confession years later whch  the apologists dont accept but say oh she must have made it under duress of torture

She was convicted or murder

Amaral was convicted on a tiny technicality, fall guy for someone

[Mr Gray]

The thread in reference to this CONVICT is elsewhere.

HER CONVICTION STILL STANDS.

perhaps you didn't notice,,perhaps reading is not your strong point but it was j rob who introduced cipriano to this thread...
furthermore amarals conviction still stands...a point also raised and disputed by j rob

[stephen25000]

perhaps you didn't notice,,perhaps reading is not your strong point but it was j rob who introduced cipriano to this thread...
furthermore amarals conviction still stands...a point also raised and disputed by j rob

I noticed it davel.

However, you wish to use it to damn Amaral, as per usual.

and as per usual, you continue the insults.

So pathetic and so predictable.

[Mr Gray]

I noticed it davel.

However, you wish to use it to damn Amaral, as per usual.

and as per usual, you continue the insults.

So pathetic and so predictable.

Stephen..is it any wonder I consider you an idiot...Look back and see who introduced amaral to this thread

[stephen25000]

Stephen..is it any wonder I consider you an idiot...Look back and see who introduced amaral to this thread

Try reading my response again.

Perhaps you require teaching some basic comprehension ?

[Mr Gray]

What a totally ridiculous statement Davel. If you are being choked then you airways are blocked. It is therefore impossible to emit a scream. That is pretty basic stuff.

Furthermore the quote states fires are the main cause of deaths but does not give any percentages nor any other death scenarios therefore you cannot argue that death by choking does not occur.

Some interesting statistics for you Davel......

"More than 90% of deaths from foreign object occur in children younger than 5 years old; 65% of them are infants! (AHA)"



Please feel free to read the rest of the facts on choking. It may enlighten you more.

http://www.becpr.org/facts_statistics.aspx

Another one who cant read...I said the TWINS would scream the place down...reading is pretty basic stuff but perhaps Im asking too much of posters like you. The choking child would thrash about knocking furniture over and make an absolute racket. it also invariably happens at mealtimes when adults are present..

Not quite as smart as you think you are..are you


can YOU come up with an accident scenario

[Cariad]

What a totally ridiculous statement Davel. If you are being choked then you airways are blocked. It is therefore impossible to emit a scream. That is pretty basic stuff.

Furthermore the quote states fires are the main cause of deaths but does not give any percentages nor any other death scenarios therefore you cannot argue that death by choking does not occur.

Some interesting statistics for you Davel......

"More than 90% of deaths from foreign object occur in children younger than 5 years old; 65% of them are infants! (AHA)"

Please feel free to read the rest of the facts on choking. It may enlighten you more.

http://www.becpr.org/facts_statistics.aspx

You beat me to it 

[stephen25000]

Another one who cant read...I said the TWINS would scream the place down...reading is pretty basic stuff but perhaps Im asking too much of posters like you. The choking child would thrash about knocking furniture over and make an absolute racket. it also invariably happens at mealtimes when adults are present..

Not quite as smart as you think you are..are you


can YOU come up with an accident scenario

Your continued deriding of other posters merely reinforces your insecurity and a false sense of your own importance.

Then again what's new with that. 

[slartibartfast]

Another one who cant read...I said the TWINS would scream the place down...reading is pretty basic stuff but perhaps Im asking too much of posters like you. The choking child would thrash about knocking furniture over and make an absolute racket. it also invariably happens at mealtimes when adults are present..

Not quite as smart as you think you are..are you


can YOU come up with an accident scenario

You mean the twins would have been easily disturbed?

[Redblossom]

Its absolutely impossible  or very rare that madeleine could have had any kind of accident in that flat whilst left alone

 >@@(*&)

How utterly pathetic irrational nonsensical and counter to all known facts and statistics  is that assertion or suggestion.
Leave the stragglers to it that assert abduction is MORE likely to befall a child in their own home, than a fatal accident, dear god, talk about twisting facts!
What are the numbers of children dying in their own homes versus ones abducted from them?
Big versus tiny!!

[Mr Gray]

Fair cop Davel but at least I'm smart enough to recognise the danger of choking so I'll stick with the choking scenario given that according to one study it's the 4th leading cause of unintentional death amongst under 5's.

Only a fool would dismiss choking as a very real risk. Are you a fool Davel?

http://www.health.ny.gov/prevention/injury_prevention/choking_prevention_for_children.htm

what im saying is that if choking occurred it would have been a very noisy episode and would sure to have disturbed someone.....of course according to anne g as no one had ever choked before in 5a the chances of it happennig is zero..