Statistically...what are the chances that Maddie was abducted..

[Mr Gray]

Not yours, as it is invariably pure gibberish. 

Meanwhile merely because kate and gerry state something, does not make it true.

Even in your little world.

 You are such a chump......when did I say it made it true?...do you get absolutely everything wrong... I think you do

[stephen25000]

You are such a chump......when did I say it made it true?...do you get absolutely everything wrong... I think you do

Ah insults again davel.

Par for your course.

[Estuarine]

Ah insults again davel.

Par for your course.

Perhaps he should consider changing his screen name to Dr Ivel

[stephen25000]

Perhaps he should consider changing his screen name to Dr Ivel

 

[Lyall]

Perhaps he should consider changing his screen name to Dr Ivel

It too me a while

[Mr Gray]

Not yours, as it is invariably pure gibberish. 

Meanwhile merely because kate and gerry state something, does not make it true.

Even in your little world.

This was your post to me and then accuse me of insulting you...read your post again...if you cant take it don't dish it

[AnneGuedes]

What are the mods doing ?
I don't report, no use..

[stephen25000]

Maybe not but it was still described as a professional abduction.

davel.

You have repeatedly insulted me and many other posters on here.

Get over yourself.

[Cariad]

What are the mods doing ?
I don't report, no use..

They might be busy tonight....

On that note, I'm off to watch some telly.

Nos Da!

[Mr Gray]

davel.

You have repeatedly insulted me and many other posters on here.

Get over yourself.

Do you not realise your insults...why should I try to make a fool of you when you are quite capable of doing it yourself

J Rob accused me of lying...am I boverred

[AnneGuedes]

They might be busy tonight....

On that note, I'm off to watch some telly.

Nos Da!

Enjoy it ! The wolf ?

[stephen25000]

Do you not realise your insults...why should I try to make a fool of you when you are quite capable of doing it yourself

J Rob accused me of lying...am I boverred

Of course you are boverred, otherwise you would not reply.

As to making a fool of yourself, look at your posts.

[Sherlock Holmes]

Not to be pedantic folks, but the thread topic is not about evidence or proof, legally admissable or otherwise.

It is about the statistical chances of abduction in this case.

And  the statistics relating to parental involvement in abduction cases are largely irrelevant to family McCann.

There was no custody battle, child abuse, mental problems of the parents, or any of the other issues that go to make up that 86% statistic.

[stephen25000]

s

Not to be pedantic folks, but the thread topic is not about evidence or proof, legally admissable or otherwise.

It is about the statistical chances of abduction in this case.

And  the statistics relating to parental involvement in abduction cases are largely irrelevant to family McCann.

There was no custody battle, child abuse, mental problems of the parents, or any of the other issues that go to make up that 86% statistic.

The trouble is, there is not one iota of evidence, let alone forensic backup, to indicate abduction.

As to the background of the mccanns, we only 'know' what has been fed to the press

[Redblossom]

Not to be pedantic folks, but the thread topic is not about evidence or proof, legally admissable or otherwise.

It is about the statistical chances of abduction in this case.

And  the statistics relating to parental involvement in abduction cases are largely irrelevant to family McCann.

There was no custody battle, child abuse, mental problems of the parents, or any of the other issues that go to make up that 86% statistic.

Sorry to be pedantic too but the whole discussion was not about parental custodial abductions (alive children) but  all and any parental or familial and friends involvement in  both live and dead children, and the statistics do show this figures in the majority..have to go,check back later