Statistically...what are the chances that Maddie was abducted..

[j.rob]

dont need them... id bet my house those statements are full of translation errors

What about the errors that were made before translation? Or maybe the translation errors cancel out the original errors?!

[Mr Gray]

What about the errors that were made before translation? Or maybe the translation errors cancel out the original errors?!

We will never know because the stupid pj did not record the interviews...common practice in the uk

[jassi]

We will never know because the stupid pj did not record the interviews...common practice in the uk

Great shame,  for then there would have been no wriggle-room over what was and was not said.

[j.rob]

We will never know because the stupid pj did not record the interviews...common practice in the uk

'Stupid PJ' eh? Always someone else's fault, isn't it?

When are the McCanns going to accept some responsibility for the disappearance of their daughter? How about some transparency about what REALLY went on during that holiday.

The total stranger abduction theory is about as plausible as the big bad wolf. The PJ were a damn sight more intelligent than Leicestershire police, the media and a lot of the public (at least initially).

[Mr Gray]

'Stupid PJ' eh? Always someone else's fault, isn't it?

When are the McCanns going to accept some responsibility for the disappearance of their daughter? How about some transparency about what REALLY went on during that holiday.

The total stranger abduction theory is about as plausible as the big bad wolf. The PJ were a damn sight more intelligent than Leicestershire police, the media and a lot of the public (at least initially).

all in your opinion of course

[j.rob]

all in your opinion of course

As, presumably, are your posts which I notice never quote direct sources (eg: witness statements). If you are so sure of the facts, why not provide evidence? At least I have given some sources in some of my posts - eg: witness statements. No doubt you will say they are not reliable because of the 'stupid' PJ (is that defamation, by the way?)

So the only 'truth' is the statements given by the McCanns and their friends, eh? They weren't even there when their daughter was 'taken' (so they say) so how can their statements carry that much weight?

One of the 'only' pieces of evidence was Jane Tanner's sighting which has been ruled out. Their story is about as flimsy as house of cards.

[Mr Gray]

As, presumably, are your posts which I notice never quote direct sources (eg: witness statements). If you are so sure of the facts, why not provide evidence? At least I have given some sources in some of my posts - eg: witness statements. No doubt you will say they are not reliable because of the 'stupid' PJ (is that defamation, by the way?)

So the only 'truth' is the statements given by the McCanns and their friends, eh? They weren't even there when their daughter was 'taken' (so they say) so how can their statements carry that much weight?

One of the 'only' pieces of evidence was Jane Tanner's sighting which has been ruled out. Their story is about as flimsy as house of cards.

you've just claimed that the fund has failed in its aims but despite my requests have not provided a guote from the aims of the fund to support this.....I will leave it there

[Estuarine]

you've just claimed that the fund has failed in its aims but despite my requests have not provided a guote from the aims of the fund to support this...you basically post a load of rubbish...imo...I will leave it there

The stated aims and principle activities are listed in the 2012 accounts submitted to CH for all to see. The trick though is finding a copy of The Articles of Association for the company which will reveal a bit more. I am sure davel you are world leading authority on the Companies Act among your other many talents.

[Mr Gray]

The stated aims and principle activities are listed in the 2012 accounts submitted to CH for all to see. The trick though is finding a copy of The Articles of Association for the company which will reveal a bit more. I am sure davel you are world leading authority on the Companies Act among your other many talents.

Well j rob has stated that the fund has failed in its aims...so...unless hes making it all up he must have a copy...what do you think...I know what I think

[Mr Gray]

The stated aims and principle activities are listed in the 2012 accounts submitted to CH for all to see. The trick though is finding a copy of The Articles of Association for the company which will reveal a bit more. I am sure davel you are world leading authority on the Companies Act among your other many talents.

I do have reasonable knowledge of the companies act now you mention it...so you can add malfeasance to the possible charges you imagine the McCanns will eventually face

[Estuarine]

I do have reasonable knowledge of the companies act now you mention it...so you can add malfeasance to the possible charges you imagine the McCanns will eventually face

Explain?

[Mr Gray]

Explain?

directors duties..fraud

[pathfinder73]

The most important defence in any crime is having a good alibi.

Yes Smithman had to keep his alibi i.e. being present at the tapas bar. He couldn't lose that so he couldn't be at the beach and the tapas bar at the same time. So to keep his alibi the first move was enough to get her a safe distance from the apartment. The 2nd move to further away was done when he had more time to do it in the chaos and confusion of the first searches but he was moving quick with the child as witnesses noticed. So he didn't want to be missing for too long or caught in the act.

[Estuarine]

directors duties..fraud

So how does malfeasance apply in this particular instance?

[Mr Gray]

So how does malfeasance apply in this particular instance?

its of no importance because its not going to happen..its just such a lovely word