Author Topic: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.  (Read 143782 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #90 on: January 14, 2014, 12:09:28 AM »
Why did she do that? oh and btw it wasnt only to Fiona,  it was to Rachel and Jane too.....if she said that that comment by Madeleine would  " never have crossed her mind again" if she hadnt been abducted.....???? But it did Benice, so... ???? Answer that one

from 2.10

But you need to listen from abut a minute in

Now you've got Gerry gulping again 8)-)))

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #91 on: January 14, 2014, 12:13:03 AM »
You've lost me Red.   I haven't accused anyone of making anything up.   


You said  rachel being next door on may 2nd (the night kate says madeleine said she and sean were crying) would  have heard two child crying....so if she didnt was madeleine or kate lyng....which was your suggestion...oh never mind though

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #92 on: January 14, 2014, 12:17:57 AM »
I think Benice has legged it Red 8(>((

The question was too tricky!

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #93 on: January 14, 2014, 12:21:06 AM »
Why did she do that? oh and btw it wasnt only to Fiona,  it was to Rachel and Jane too.....if she said that that comment by Madeleine would  " never have crossed her mind again" if she hadnt been abducted.....???? But it did Benice, so... ???? Answer that one

from 2.10

But you need to listen from abut a minute in


That's an excellent point Red. "It wouldn't have passed through my head again" - but it did as she said it at the tapas bar on the 3rd. All these important things are said just before Madeleine is reported to be missing. Nobody can ignore this and the many other contradictions.

Rachael would've heard Madeleine crying if it was on the 2nd being next door. Fenn was correct that it was on the 1st that the crying incident happened.
« Last Edit: January 14, 2014, 12:24:41 AM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #94 on: January 14, 2014, 12:23:46 AM »
Now you've got Gerry gulping again 8)-)))

Wahay LOL nothing to do wih me!

Its Sandra asking uncomfortable questions

And at a time before the police files were released and they had no idea what was in them too.....so gerry gulps for kate ok. Night night


« Last Edit: January 14, 2014, 12:26:34 AM by Redblossom »

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #95 on: January 14, 2014, 12:28:54 AM »
That's an excellent point Red. "It wouldn't have passed through my head again" - but it did as she said it at the tapas bar on the 3rd. All these important things are said just before Madeleine is reported to be missing. Nobody can ignore this and the many other contradictions.

Rachael would've heard Madeleine crying if it was on the 2nd being next door. Fenn was correct that it was on the 1st that the crying incident happened.

Thats a good point pathfinder......

Offline Benice

Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #96 on: January 14, 2014, 12:32:53 AM »

You said  rachel being next door on may 2nd (the night kate says madeleine said she and sean were crying) would  have heard two child crying....so if she didnt was madeleine or kate lyng....which was your suggestion...oh never mind though

I didn't say anyone was lying.   No-body knows for sure what Madeleine was talking about - because she moved off as soon as she'd said it and was totally unconcerned.   

I repeat if Madeleine - or Madeleine and Sean had cried the night before, then it couldn't have been for long because Rachael would have heard them.   

So maybe they did cry for a few minutes.  Or maybe they didn't.  Or maybe Madeleine was talking about a completely different time, or maybe she dreamed it.   No-body can say for sure because they never got to the bottom of it.

It has nothing to do with anyone lying.







The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #97 on: January 14, 2014, 12:37:02 AM »
I didn't say anyone was lying.   No-body knows for sure what Madeleine was talking about - because she moved off as soon as she'd said it and was totally unconcerned.   

I repeat if Madeleine - or Madeleine and Sean had cried the night before, then it couldn't have been for long because Rachael would have heard them.   

So maybe they did cry for a few minutes.  Or maybe they didn't.  Or maybe Madeleine was talking about a completely different time, or maybe she dreamed it.   No-body can say for sure because they never got to the bottom of it.

It has nothing to do with anyone lying.

I agree she dreamed it, probably what it all was

Offline Benice

Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #98 on: January 14, 2014, 12:46:08 AM »
Thats a good point pathfinder......

IMO Kate was saying that if Madeleine had not been abducted on the 3rd May if would not have come into her mind again after that date - and why would it?

Picking over every syllable of every word the McCanns ever uttered is unfair IMO.   Conversations bear no resemblance to the written word.   But their conversations are treated and criticised as it they ARE the written word.
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #99 on: January 14, 2014, 12:51:58 AM »
IMO Kate was saying that if Madeleine had not been abducted on the 3rd May if would not have come into her mind again after that date - and why would it?

Picking over every syllable of every word the McCanns ever uttered is unfair IMO.   Conversations bear no resemblance to the written word.   But their conversations are treated and criticised as it they ARE the written word.

But according to the rogatory interviews she did mention it before the disappearance was discovered during the meal >@@(*&)

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #100 on: January 14, 2014, 12:56:01 AM »
IMO Kate was saying that if Madeleine had not been abducted on the 3rd May if would not have come into her mind again after that date - and why would it?

Picking over every syllable of every word the McCanns ever uttered is unfair IMO.   Conversations bear no resemblance to the written word.   But their conversations are treated and criticised as it they ARE the written word.

Stop spinning

She definitely said if madeleine had not been abducted, that thought wouldnt have crossed her mind, it was mentiioned IE  BEFORE she was abducted Benice, ie early on in dinner May 3rdM ie BEFORE not AFTER. Jesus.see ya

Offline Sherlock Holmes

Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #101 on: January 14, 2014, 01:02:48 AM »
IMO Kate was saying that if Madeleine had not been abducted on the 3rd May if would not have come into her mind again after that date - and why would it?

Picking over every syllable of every word the McCanns ever uttered is unfair IMO.   Conversations bear no resemblance to the written word.   But their conversations are treated and criticised as it they ARE the written word.

This makes perfect sense to me. Kate remembered the conversation with Madeleine because it took place during the last few hours they spent in each others' company, and because she was under scrutiny in police and other interviews. She would have been going through all the events of the holiday in her mind and trying to make some kind of sense of them.

There would have been much less reason ever to recall that conversation otherwise.

Offline Benice

Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #102 on: January 14, 2014, 01:08:58 AM »
But according to the rogatory interviews she did mention it before the disappearance was discovered during the meal >@@(*&)

Read my post again.  I said she would not have thought of it again after the day that Madeleine was abducted.  She spoke of it during dinner before Madeleine was abducted.

Madeleine spoke to her on the morning of the 3rd. Kate mentioned it during dinner that evening.    If she had not been abducted later that night then they would just have continued with their holiday and KM would not have given it another thought - because she would have had no reason to.      It was Madeleine's abduction which gave her the reason to go back over everything that had happened on the 3rd which included what Madeleine had said on that morning.




The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #103 on: January 14, 2014, 01:16:08 AM »
This makes perfect sense to me. Kate remembered the conversation with Madeleine because it took place during the last few hours they spent in each others' company, and because she was under scrutiny in police and other interviews. She would have been going through all the events of the holiday in her mind and trying to make some kind of sense of them.

There would have been much less reason ever to recall that conversation otherwise.

It would  'make perfect sense'  if  Kate remembered that conversation she claims to have had  with Madeleine because she was  'under scrutiny'  in police and other interviews,, and she was going through all events of the holiday in her mind and trying to make some kind of sense of them

That's not what happened though

She sat down at the table and almost immediately related that conversation with her friends

While she was doing so,  according to her version of events,  Madeleine was safely tucked up in bed

...  No duress  ...  no stress  ...  no scrutiny   ...  no reason to be going through the event in her mind

She brought up the subject voluntarily and without  prompting    ...  the subject she claims would never have  entered her head at all if Madeleine had not been  'abducted' 
« Last Edit: January 14, 2014, 01:18:28 AM by icabodcrane »

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #104 on: January 14, 2014, 01:16:39 AM »
Read my post again.  I said she would not have thought of it again after the day that Madeleine was abducted.  She spoke of it during dinner before Madeleine was abducted.

Madeleine spoke to her on the morning of the 3rd. Kate mentioned it during dinner that evening.    If she had not been abducted later that night then they would just have continued with their holiday and KM would not have given it another thought - because she would have had no reason to.      It was Madeleine's abduction which gave her the reason to go back over everything that had happened on the 3rd which included what Madeleine had said on that morning.

"If what happened hadn't happened that comment would never have passed through my head again" - K McCann's comment in the video Red posted on the previous page.

But it did because she mentioned it during the meal (according to the rogatory interviews). Why?