Author Topic: Innocentman came forward in 2007!  (Read 52109 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sherlock Holmes

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #150 on: January 25, 2014, 10:00:44 PM »
Why don't you drop the "accuse", we're no court here !

There is a fine line between suggestion and accusation.

When one says 'J'accuse' it is a figure of speech.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #151 on: January 25, 2014, 10:01:02 PM »
You're not trying to understand what happened to Madeleine, but how the abductor managed to make her vanish.
I'm not sure that your mentor would approve that..

So I am not trying to understand because I don't agree with you?  Has it ever crossed your mind that you could be wrong?

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #152 on: January 25, 2014, 10:03:20 PM »
Yes, the simplest and best way possible.

Ironic that so much time and effort has gone into discussing scenarios that are altogether much less likely - such as Smithman's evening stroll.

Or Tannermans

Or a charity collector three weeks earlier being the abductor, because he gave some old woman the creeps,or a man seen in Oct 2006 around the apartment being the abductor, or a near death 67 yr old ex convicted child abductor being the abductor, or a woman in barcelona buying a baby, that the witness took two yrs to come forward with info for, or all the long string of other pathetic and "manufactured" sightings, all so much more likely I suppose
« Last Edit: January 25, 2014, 10:15:44 PM by Redblossom »

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #153 on: January 25, 2014, 10:03:51 PM »
You're correct Davel a crime would have been committed for a cover up to happen IMO.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #154 on: January 25, 2014, 10:04:48 PM »
I think you over-emphasise my connection with my mentor.

Aside from some amateur attempts at violin playing I have nothing in common with the man.
Then play the violin, forget 221b, and dedicate yourself to the 3rd Partita of Johann Sebastian. That's my wish for you.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #155 on: January 25, 2014, 10:05:35 PM »
You're correct Davel a crime would have been committed for a cover up to happen IMO.
Not imo.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #156 on: January 25, 2014, 10:07:48 PM »
There is a fine line between suggestion and accusation.

When one says 'J'accuse' it is a figure of speech.
Let's say "suggest" then ! We're no Zola here !

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #157 on: January 25, 2014, 10:09:48 PM »
Yes, the simplest and best way possible.

Ironic that so much time and effort has gone into discussing scenarios that are altogether much less likely - such as Smithman's evening stroll.
Is is ironic to discard the little blond girl Smithman was carrying so fatherly ?

Offline Sherlock Holmes

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #158 on: January 25, 2014, 10:15:50 PM »
Then play the violin, forget 221b, and dedicate yourself to the 3rd Partita of Johann Sebastian. That's my wish for you.

Actually just working on the Double concerto now!

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #159 on: January 25, 2014, 10:16:08 PM »
Not imo.

From the time period hypothesis I have there's adult(s) in 5A if it happened so there's more to this than a tragic accidental death. More Incriminating factors are involved if that did happen in order for anyone to go to those lengths using that hypothesis.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2014, 10:20:18 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #160 on: January 25, 2014, 10:19:57 PM »
Actually just working on the Double concerto now!
Then you have a partner, that's marvellous !

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #161 on: January 25, 2014, 10:21:37 PM »
From the time period hypothesis I have there's adult(s) in 5A if it happened so there's more to this than a tragic accidental death. More Incriminating factors are involved if that did happen in order for anyone to go to those lengths using that hypothesis.
Are you referring to the Payne questionnaires ?

Offline Sherlock Holmes

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #162 on: January 25, 2014, 10:22:39 PM »
Is is ironic to discard the little blond girl Smithman was carrying so fatherly ?

Considering a driver could have been miles away by the time Smithman was spotted...

Offline Eleanor

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #163 on: January 25, 2014, 10:23:54 PM »
Then you have a partner, that's marvellous !

Que?

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #164 on: January 25, 2014, 10:24:29 PM »
Considering a driver could have been miles away by the time Smithman was spotted...
A ghost driver, yes certainly !