Author Topic: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?  (Read 205299 times)

0 Members and 30 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline jassi

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #60 on: February 01, 2014, 02:12:24 PM »
OMG.

A Freudian Slip, or what.   8)--))

I did wonder
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Eleanor

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #61 on: February 01, 2014, 02:17:42 PM »
According to Montclair, Amaral is fair game......So......

I think he has grossly abused his position in the investigation, and stated that his theory is fact when he has No Evidence. 
His criminal record and abuse of his brother, and others, is a matter of record. 

And his own child care leaves a lot to be desired. (Allegedly - SH)

Apart from that, he obviously does not have the ability to apply reason to anything.

So according to the rights invested in me by The Portuguese Constitution, I shall continue to express what I think.
He is fair game.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2014, 06:52:03 PM by Sherlock Holmes »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #62 on: February 01, 2014, 02:23:32 PM »
According to Montclair, Amaral is fair game......So......

I think he has grossly abused his position in the investigation, and stated that his theory is fact when he has No Evidence. 
His criminal record and abuse of his brother, and others, is a matter of record.  And his own child care leaves a lot to be desired.
Apart from that, he obviously does not have the ability to apply reason to anything.

So according to the rights invested in me by The Portuguese Constitution, I shall continue to express what I think.
He is fair game.

So according to the rights invested in me by The Portuguese Constitution, I shall continue to express what I think.
He is fair game....seconded

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #63 on: February 01, 2014, 02:25:21 PM »
According to Montclair, Amaral is fair game......So......

I think he has grossly abused his position in the investigation, and stated that his theory is fact when he has No Evidence. 
His criminal record and abuse of his brother, and others, is a matter of record.  And his own child care leaves a lot to be desired.
Apart from that, he obviously does not have the ability to apply reason to anything.

So according to the rights invested in me by The Portuguese Constitution, I shall continue to express what I think.
He is fair game.

Of course you do, you're a Mitchell.

 8(0(*

Offline Eleanor

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #64 on: February 01, 2014, 02:57:13 PM »
Of course you do, you're a Mitchell.

 8(0(*

Too true.  Never underestimate a Mitchell.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #65 on: February 01, 2014, 03:02:08 PM »
Too true.  Never underestimate a Mitchell.

I never do. 8(0(*

Offline Eleanor

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #66 on: February 01, 2014, 03:12:06 PM »

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #67 on: February 01, 2014, 03:16:17 PM »
Very wise.  For once.

I knew you wouldn't get my point.   ?{)(**

Offline Eleanor

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #68 on: February 01, 2014, 03:42:09 PM »
I knew you wouldn't get my point.   ?{)(**

Of course you did.  You simply do not understand superior intelligence.  It's in the genes.

Offline Carana

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #69 on: February 01, 2014, 03:56:12 PM »
The appeals court in October 2010 determined that the book was not libellous and that GA's opinion was based on the facts of the case, which were already in the public domain.

The McCanns are taking everybody and his brother to court for the simple reason that they do not want anyone to see the other side of the coin and to have access to the facts. It is nothing but a PR campaign so that no one will know anything other than what the parents say.

Here in Portugal, the law is transparent and everyone has access to court decisions and they even have the right to disagree with verdicts and to discuss them openly. Even if the judge were to decide that GA committed libel (IMO, unlikely) I still would have the right to say I don't agree with her decision and to discuss it.

To take a small example. He heard about / saw police video of certain booklets in the villa and his insinuation was that their presence was highly unusual and therefore suspicious.

The fact is: yes, they were found in the villa.

What is NOT fact is that there was anything suspicious about them, which is what he had made them appear to the average reader.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=3259.0

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #70 on: February 01, 2014, 04:10:18 PM »
Of course you did.  You simply do not understand superior intelligence.  It's in the genes.

Not in the case of the Mitchell's.

A classic sign of a limited gene base.

Very limited. @)(++(*

Offline jassi

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #71 on: February 01, 2014, 04:15:49 PM »
Not in the case of the Mitchell's.

A classic sign of a limited gene base.

Very limited. @)(++(*

Are they amongst the group that are 40% neanderthal ?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #72 on: February 01, 2014, 04:20:52 PM »
Are they amongst the group that are 40% neanderthal ?

Look out for the brow ridges. @)(++(*

Estuarine

  • Guest
Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #73 on: February 01, 2014, 04:28:16 PM »
Seeing as we are having a knock about again. I had to Google Mitchell; is it the North American B25 Mitchell bomber or the Mitchell fishing reel made by Carpano and Pons? Please advise

Offline Eleanor

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #74 on: February 01, 2014, 04:33:37 PM »
Not in the case of the Mitchell's.

A classic sign of a limited gene base.

Very limited. @)(++(*

It must really piss you off that Clarence Mitchell is doing so well.  What a shame.  Never mind.

How well I am doing is none of your business.  But there is nothing vicious or accusatory in my soul.