Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?

[pegasus]

Interesting. Could you cite the differences?

Re black bag (not the black plastic bag on cliff)
(1)book by KM says "A witness claimed to have seen ..."
(2)book by GA appears to not mention that same event?
Seems odd that GA would not mention it.
IMO it maybe is in GA book after all, and in the files too, but both books get the exact details slightly wrong?

[Anna]

Re black bag (not the black plastic bag on cliff)
(1)book by KM says "A witness claimed to have seen ..."
(2)book by GA appears to not mention that same event?
Seems odd that GA would not mention it.
IMO it maybe is in GA book after all, and in the files too, but both books get the exact details slightly wrong?

What black bag? Do you mean the blue tennis bag?

[Eleanor]

"The injunction is deemed not valid because it was not proved."

That is why there is a Libel Trial.

[pegasus]

What black bag? Do you mean the blue tennis bag?

See KM book  chapter 16, big black bag

[Anna]

See KM book  chapter 16, big black bag

I haven't got her book or Amarals. I think it is a dreadful thing, to make money from a child who has disappeared so soon after her disappearance and with no known conclusions, but of course Amaral is allowed to write a book declaring she is dead without the crime ever being solved. That is a cruel and inhuman thing to do to any bereaved parents, IMO.
 

[pegasus]

I haven't got her book or Amarals. I think it is a dreadful thing, to make money from a child who has disappeared so soon after her disappearance and with no known conclusions, but of course Amaral is allowed to write a book declaring she is dead without the crime ever being solved. That is a cruel and inhuman thing to do to any bereaved parents, IMO.

GA book is accesible online link available.
KM book also highly recommended I dont have online link.
IMO both genuinely searching hard for the child.

[Cariad]

Can you please provide cites as per forum rules.

Bump as I'm still awaiting cites.....

[pegasus]

Bump as I'm still awaiting cites.....

The links to phonecall are on some sites which I believe this forum does not encourage posting links to?

[jassi]

So no defamation is being considered in the current Trial, despite Amaral accusing The McCanns of being responsible for their daughter's death and hiding her body?
Is this sort of thing allowed in Portugal?

Who knows?  Lets wait and see - it should only be another year or two 

[Cariad]

The links to phonecall are on some sites which I believe this forum does not encourage posting links to?

Hmm...

That's a toughy then as I'm pretty sure the forum doesn't encourage making claims without back up.

Maybe a Mod come come and clarify?

[pegasus]

Hmm...
That's a toughy then as I'm pretty sure the forum doesn't encourage making claims without back up.
Maybe a Mod come come and clarify?

Yes maybe mods can clarify can we post link, or if not can we post screenshot?
IMO it is interesting stuff to see how the other world think, gloating over their attack without even pausing to realise they are pawns in the ONLY such years-long attack on an investigator anywhere in the world ever.

BTW even if that other site has removed their gloating page, with the puppet comments at the bottom, no problem, I think a mate of mine might have stashed away a screenshot 

[ferryman]

Those of a certain persuasion seem to have wiped most traces from the net.

But one remains.

Try googling the names of Ana Sofia Bras and her husband, Jose Araujo

[Angelo222]

Post the link if it is relevant.

Also, could we stay on topic and avoid posting spam.

[sadie]

Those of a certain persuasion seem to have wiped most traces from the net.

But one remains.

Try googling the names of Ana Sofia Bras and her husband, Jose Araujo

I have been saying this for about 2 years now, but you are the first to confirm it, ferryman.   Glad to see you have noticed what is happening too.

Very worrying.  It means that virtually all the evidence can be wiped, or adjusted to follow a specific agenda.


Justice as we know it will not exist.  The people with most control of the internet will be able to detrimentally influence every case.


Sinister !.

Wait for the new false evidence next.  It will be coming, almost certainly.

If that happens, then

Then it's even more sinister

[Cariad]

I have been saying this for about 2 years now, but you are the first to confirm it, ferryman.   Glad to see you have noticed what is happening too.

Very worrying.  It means that virtually all the evidence can be wiped, or adjusted to follow a specific agenda.


Justice as we know it will not exist.  The people with most control of the internet will be able to detrimentally influence every case.


Sinister !.

Wait for the new false evidence next.  It will be coming, almost certainly.

If that happens, then

Then it's even more sinister

Ummm.... Links please? For this and your previous claim.

Angelo has kindly given you permission.