But icabod, hasn't this always been one of the shadows hanging over the investigation of Scotland Yard, namely
the fact that much of their work is predicated on old material, which may or may not be completely accurate and may not have been followed though to completion at the time?
Surely it has been a distinct possibility from the get -go that the SY investigation might never bear fruit, if none of the old leads go anywhere, and new ones are not generated?
The base information SY have to work with is only as good as the PJ left it. And if there were things that the PJ didn't follow up, resulting in possible leads gone cold, there's not much that can be done about that now.
I'm not saying that the PJ did not in general follow up leads properly, or that SY can use the fact that their work is heavily reliant on that of the PJ as an excuse for not getting anywhere.
But the fact remains that if there happened to be any leads not properly pursued by the PJ, for whatever reason, this could have forever stymied progress in the case.
We knew this when we (the British taxpayer) signed what has become a blank cheque - and we signed it anyway.
Firstly the reason why stuff was left possibly not checked thoroughly was because of the INTERFERENCE by the team McCann and their inexcusably stupid detective agencies. There was so much stuff thrown at the PJ, bogus sightings, suspects etc, that the case just grew and grew until it became so huge the task was almost impossible.
IF you can imagine it has taken a TEAM OF detectives TWO YEARS to trawl through paperwork from PJ, it shows how much stuff there was gathered.
Oh and we were not ASKED to sign a cheque, we were TOLD IT WAS BEING SIGNED and there is a big difference.
I have friends who are disabled and struggling to live, and they cant get money OFF our government. 10 million pounds would go a long way to help a lot of people survive.
In all my life i have never heard of the government intervening in a childs disappearance, and there are many.
This case was thoroughly checked by the PJ, they came to a stand still, because there is simply no evidence for an abduction. The only evidence they really have is from the dogs and some blood samples.
The PJ asked at the beginning for mobile phone information and I believe were turned down.
I think IF the police had been allowed to deal with this case with the help from the British Police at the beginning and there had been no interference I think they may have gotten somewhere.
The truth in the pudding for me was the unclaimed reward which speaks volumes.