Latest reports claim the keys at OC had been stolen?

[Anna]

Agreed it sounds like nonsense but I would've followed up on this discrepancy.

Teofilo Manuel Furtado Castela - Administrative Services Manager - Witness statement

Bernardino Silva, told him on Friday, the 04 of May, that the day prior, the date the child went missing, that he saw a strange individual around the resort; .

Bernardino de Abreu Pereia da Silva - Maintenance Worker / Driver - Witness statement

He states that at no moment, did he notice the presence of anyone with an abnormal behaviour, as regards children, or anything else which appeared to be of suspicious nature.
When asked, he says he no longer works for the MW OC for health reasons, he made the decision to resign.
When questioned about having made a telephone call on 3rd May at 21.00.11 having activated antennas in P da L, when his working day finished at 20.30, he says that on this day, as well as on others, he was delayed because he had to carry out the transport, even though it was late, of some tourists.

And his second statement


Processos Vol XV


Pages 4114 – 4115

Witness Statement

Bernardino Abreu Pereira da Silva (previously identified on p 372)

He confirms the integrity of his statement on page 372.


When asked, he says he no longer works for the MW OC for health reasons, he made the decision to resign.

When questioned about having made a telephone call on 3rd May at 21.00.11 having activated antennas in P da L, when his working day finished at 20.30, he says that on this day, as well as on others, he was delayed because he had to carry out the transport, even though it was late, of some tourists. At this time he was driving the minibus belonging to the establishment. H e also says, that on this day, as well as the transport already referred to, he was late because of the fact that some tourists did not have the key to their apartment.

With regard to the number that he dialled on that day at that time, he says it was the number 966****** corresponding to his wife’s number, which was confirmed in this file.

----------------------------------------

Another maintenance  worker on call( day off) was called at 20.30 because a tourist was having trouble with the doorlock

[drummer]

For those that said SY were stupid for alerting suspects of any possible interest in them, well it's certainly brought a few people into the spotlight who all of a sudden want to talk.

[Redblossom]

When questioned about having made a telephone call on 3rd May at 21.00.11 having activated antennas in P da L, when his working day finished at 20.30, he says that on this day, as well as on others, he was delayed because he had to carry out the transport, even though it was late, of some tourists. At this time he was driving the minibus belonging to the establishment. H e also says, that on this day, as well as the transport already referred to, he was late because of the fact that some tourists did not have the key to their apartment.

Well, that couldn't be because the keys , from block 5, all together on one long cable as reported, we're missing/mislaid/stolen, from /by the maintenance worker, as all the tapas group got into their block 5 apartments OK that day! Must  have been another reason.
Tourists didnt get their keys for their apartments from the maintenance workers.

Edited

[Anna]

Well, that couldn't be because the keys , from block 5, all together on one long cable as reported, we're missing/mislaid/stolen, from /by the maintenance worker, as all the tapas group got into their block 5 apartments OK that day! Must  have been another reason.

Such as ? That is what I am querying , Keys missing for tourists and a maintenance chap called out because someone couldn't get in their door. You think that could have been a regular occurrence ?

[Redblossom]

Such as[/b] ? That is what I am querying , Keys missing for tourists and a maintenance chap called out because someone couldn't get in their door. You think that could have been a regular occurrence ?

Could be anything

Keys were given out by holiday reps/reception, NOT maintenance workers...if that were the case and if the maintenance worker lost all the keys to block 5 none of them would have got in that day! And that never happened. As for a" problem with a lock" that someone had to be called out for, that didn't mean there was no key! But in this case what are you talking about? It was late May 3rd when he was called out and not to block 5 but miles away near the millenium  restaraunt so nothng at all to do with any alledged loss of keys to BLOCK 5


http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/HAYLEY-CRAWFORD.htm

[drummer]

From my experience working in a tourist resort in the Algarve, the locks on all of the apartments would have been replaced and new keys made.

Who by? The registered key holders or anyone.

[Anna]

Could be anything

Keys were given out by holiday reps/reception, NOT maintenance workers...if that were the case and if the maintenance worker lost all the keys to block 5 none of them would have got in that day! And that never happened. As for a" problem with a lock" that someone had to be called out for, that didn't mean there was no key! But in this case what are you talking about? It was late May 3rd when he was called out and not to block 5 but miles away near the millenium  restaraunt so nothng at all to do with any alledged loss of keys to BLOCK 5


http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/HAYLEY-CRAWFORD.htm

Not to worry RB....I can't tell you what I'm thinking. without bringing more people into it and there's enough as it is, so we'll just have to wait and see

[Redblossom]

Not to worry RB....I can't tell you what I'm thinking. without bringing more people into it and there's enough as it is, so we'll just have to wait and see

So this alledged criminal pdl fraternity of workers ex workers passers by were just waiting for Madeleine McCann to arrive in pdl, of course, like there was no opportunity to steal another child ever from there and if not why not

Oh , one day a maintenance worker mislaid their keys!! Alledgedly! Of course.  And their luck was in! Was he followed around in case he did so? if he did mislay them, was the person who found them the criminal? Do you not get how ridiculous it all sounds?



You should say what you re thinking, why not thrash it out?

Actually not sure why I'm still posting in this thread. What a sap on our energies. Gnite.

[VIXTE]

Why was he questioned back in 2007 about a call he made?

Why was he the only one out of the staff to be questioned about a phone call he made?

[slartibartfast]

Why was he questioned back in 2007 about a call he made?

Why was he the only one out of the staff to be questioned about a phone call he made?

I would assume that because the police had phone records, staff rotas and addresses, they identified his phone pinging in PDL after his normal shift end on the night in question.

Which actually suggests a fairly thorough analysis.

[VIXTE]

I would assume that because the police had phone records, staff rotas and addresses, they identified his phone pinging in PDL after his normal shift end on the night in question.

Which actually suggests a fairly thorough analysis.

PJ was suspicious of him. Am I the only one who sees the man being nervous now and shifting the blame on a colleague? To me that article with interview with him says it clearly. 'It wasn't me but look at this other guy!'
And why is that? We've seen him already doing that, when he's reported 'a strange behaviour', back in 2007.

[Redblossom]

PJ was suspicious of him.

were they?


Am I the only one who sees the man being nervous now and shifting the blame on a colleague?

probably and perhaps you might have a rethink of who is trying to blame /point suspicion at all sorts


 >@@(*&)


To me that article with interview with him says it clearly. 'It wasn't me but look at this other guy!'

That article is clearly a pile of....


And why is that? We've seen him already doing that, when he's reported 'a strange behaviour', back in 2007. saying you saw a strange individual in a resort doesn't mean you are shifting blame

.....

[VIXTE]

...saying you saw a strange individual in a resort doesn't mean you are shifting blame

It often does...We've seen in more than few cases... for example Vincent Tabak, blaming the landlord in Joanna Yeates case..

And he's doing it again now, blaming the co-worker..

[Redblossom]

It often does...We've seen in more than few cases... for example Vincent Tabak, blaming the landlord in Joanna Yeates case..

And he's doing it again now, blaming the co-worker..

It can do sometimes but by that logic of yours anyone who reported a strange individual could be doing the same...Gerry did it himself too! As did a load of other witnesses.

Bernardinos report was checked out by police and was found to be not relevant as was Gerrys.

Oh and Did he blame the coworker? What did he accuse him of?

[VIXTE]

It can do sometimes but by that logic of yours anyone who reported a strange individual could be doing the same...Gerry did it himself too! As did a load of other witnesses.

Did he blame the coworker? What did he accuse him of?

This guy hasn't only reported the strange individual, he was questioned about his own phone calls by PJ, meaning they had a reason to suspect him and he has left the job soon after the disappearance  (reason to suspect he's got other financial sources to live on.. and plus he's now bringing the lost keys to the surface..

And he did blame the co-worker, in a manipulative ways suggesting the co-worker was a strange character he did not like having around ( reason he left his job) and he was afraid of him ( reason he did not report the missing keys before)