Scotland Yard and the PJ have stated the McCanns are not suspects.

[VIXTE]

Thread started by Senior Editor as per request below.

*********************************************************

Why don't you allow the posts that PJ did tell the McCanns, on a meeting they had with the SY that they were not suspects?

Madeleine McCann's parents told they are no longer suspects by Portuguese police

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccanns-parents-told-no-2592011#ixzz2txWqDdgE

I also invite all journalists, reading this forum, to clarify this exact matter.. once for all... because it seems exactly this is feeding the trolls, let the truth out please!

Parents are not suspects, neither in UK, or Portugal!

[Wonderfulspam]

Why don't you allow the posts that PJ did tell the McCanns, on a meeting they had with the SY that they were not suspects?

Madeleine McCann's parents told they are no longer suspects by Portuguese police

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccanns-parents-told-no-2592011#ixzz2txWqDdgE

I also invite all journalists, reading this forum, to clarify this exact matter.. once for all... because it seems exactly this is feeding the trolls, let the truth out please!

Parents are not suspects, neither in UK, or Portugal!

However, this doesn't prove that they didn't 'do it'.

Troll feed they will always remain & they have no one to blame but themselves. Amen.

[Redblossom]

Why don't you allow the posts that PJ did tell the McCanns, on a meeting they had with the SY that they were not suspects?

Madeleine McCann's parents told they are no longer suspects by Portuguese police

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccanns-parents-told-no-2592011#ixzz2txWqDdgE

I also invite all journalists, reading this forum, to clarify this exact matter.. once for all... because it seems exactly this is feeding the trolls, let the truth out please!

Parents are not suspects, neither in UK, or Portugal!

Their Portuguese lawyer Rogerio Alves said yesterday: “The McCanns were already informed about the reopening of the inquiry and the reasons why it was being reopened.

“They also know that this new line of inquiry excludes any responsibility of the parents.

Read it properly, they were not suspects in the line of inquiry used to reopen the case, ie the theory of Monteiro beng possibly involved

Just clarifyng!


eta PT link

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2013/10/rogerio-alves-mccanns-lawyer-new.html

[VIXTE]

Their Portuguese lawyer Rogerio Alves said yesterday: “The McCanns were already informed about the reopening of the inquiry and the reasons why it was being reopened.

“They also know that this new line of inquiry excludes any responsibility of the parents.

Read it properly, they were not suspects in the line of inquiry used to reopen the case, ie the theory of Monteiro beng possibly involved

Just clarifyng!


eta PT link

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2013/10/rogerio-alves-mccanns-lawyer-new.html

The new evidence excludes the parents..

This is the exact quote"The family was informed that the new evidence does not, in any way, point to the responsibility of the parents", assured the lawyer."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIjscMQ_dpw

Transcript from Joana Morais;

Rogério Alves, McCanns' lawyer: 'new evidence rules out the parents responsibility'
24 OCTOBER 2013 | POSTED BY JOANA MORAIS LEAVE A COMMENT

At a time when the investigation is under the secrecy of justice, Rogério Alves, the McCanns' lawyer has given multiple interviews throughout the day to Lusa news agency, Antena 1 radio, SIC TV news channel, and to RTP (among other mainstream media outlets), stating that "new evidence rules out the parents responsibility".


Maddie Case: 'new evidence rules out the responsibility of the parents'

Lisbon, Oct. 24 (Lusa) 17:16 - The lawyer of the parents of the English child, who disappeared from the Algarve in 2007, has revealed today that the couple was informed that the new evidence, on which the reopening is based, "does not, in any way, point to the responsibility" of Madeleine McCann's parents.

Rogério Alves was speaking to Lusa regarding the reopening of the investigation by the Portuguese Public Ministry and it was then that he was questioned about the possibility of Gerry and Kate MaCann [sic] being constituted as arguidos again.

"The family was informed that the new evidence does not, in any way, point to the responsibility of the parents", assured the lawyer.

in Lusa news agency release, then published in several online newspapers (with the same mistake 'MaCann')


broadcast by RTP, 20:17h, 24 October 2013

McCann couple excluded from responsibilities in the disappearance of their daughter

The lawyer of Madeleine McCann's parents revealed that the couple knew about the reopening of the process. Rogério Alves said that they were given the assurance that the new line of inquiry excludes them from any responsibility in their daughter's disappearance.

Transcript
Rogério Alves - The reopening of the investigation means that there are new leads, new paths which weren't explored and that now the Judiciary police will undertake a new search, or, rather a new set of investigative lines in order to reach the truth. That's what matters, to reach the truth. The family was informed of this reopening of the process. The family was informed of the reason behind the reopening of the process, and the family knows as well that this new line of investigation excludes any responsibility of the parents.

[AnneGuedes]

Read it properly, they were not suspects in the line of inquiry used to reopen the case, ie the theory of Monteiro beng possibly involved

Yes, very often one is misled by one's own lack of attention (the same works with oral speech) or (rather) expectation.
The same restriction applies to DCI Redwood's words : in the abduction inquiry line, the only one followed because the only one allowing Madeleine to be alive (the starter), the TP9 were no suspects.

[VIXTE]

Masters of "interpretation" come to the scene!

Redwood said it, McCanns lawyer in Portugal explained that PJ said it too..

If this is not enough, then we obviously need further clarification, and this then becomes job of investigative journalists.

But if the journalists clarify it again, in a straight line, if they get a direct quote then you will have another argument: they broke the secrecy law..

Still, I think in this case and now, it is worth 'breaking the secrecy law' to clarify this fact.. and a wish a proper journalist does it right now,  for Madeleine's sake!

[Redblossom]

The new evidence excludes the parents..

This is the exact quote"The family was informed that the new evidence does not, in any way, point to the responsibility of the parents", assured the lawyer."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIjscMQ_dpw

Transcript from Joana Morais;

Rogério Alves, McCanns' lawyer: 'new evidence rules out the parents responsibility'
24 OCTOBER 2013 | POSTED BY JOANA MORAIS LEAVE A COMMENT

At a time when the investigation is under the secrecy of justice, Rogério Alves, the McCanns' lawyer has given multiple interviews throughout the day to Lusa news agency, Antena 1 radio, SIC TV news channel, and to RTP (among other mainstream media outlets), stating that "new evidence rules out the parents responsibility".


Maddie Case: 'new evidence rules out the responsibility of the parents'

Lisbon, Oct. 24 (Lusa) 17:16 - The lawyer of the parents of the English child, who disappeared from the Algarve in 2007, has revealed today that the couple was informed that the new evidence, on which the reopening is based, "does not, in any way, point to the responsibility" of Madeleine McCann's parents.

Rogério Alves was speaking to Lusa regarding the reopening of the investigation by the Portuguese Public Ministry and it was then that he was questioned about the possibility of Gerry and Kate MaCann [sic] being constituted as arguidos again.

"The family was informed that the new evidence does not, in any way, point to the responsibility of the parents", assured the lawyer.

in Lusa news agency release, then published in several online newspapers (with the same mistake 'MaCann')


broadcast by RTP, 20:17h, 24 October 2013

McCann couple excluded from responsibilities in the disappearance of their daughter

The lawyer of Madeleine McCann's parents revealed that the couple knew about the reopening of the process. Rogério Alves said that they were given the assurance that the new line of inquiry excludes them from any responsibility in their daughter's disappearance.

Transcript
Rogério Alves - The reopening of the investigation means that there are new leads, new paths which weren't explored and that now the Judiciary police will undertake a new search, or, rather a new set of investigative lines in order to reach the truth. That's what matters, to reach the truth. The family was informed of this reopening of the process. The family was informed of the reason behind the reopening of the process, and the family knows as well that this new line of investigation excludes any responsibility of the parents.

Yes, thanks Vixte for repeating what I already posted


 

Yes, very often one is misled by one's own lack of attention (the same works with oral speech) or (rather) expectation.
The same restriction applies to DCI Redwood's words : in the abduction inquiry line, the only one followed because the only one allowing Madeleine to be alive (the starter), the TP9 were no suspects.

Indeed!

[VIXTE]

Yes, thanks Vixte for repeating what I already posted


 

Me and you interpret this differently. We understand it differently. This is why I said the further clarification is needed and only the newspapers with good credentials can clarify this now.. so it is clear and not prone to different interpretations.

[Wonderfulspam]

Masters of "interpretation" come to the scene!

Redwood said it, McCanns lawyer in Portugal explained that PJ said it too..

If this is not enough, then we obviously need further clarification, and this then becomes job of investigative journalists.

But if the journalists clarify it again, in a straight line, if they get a direct quote then you will have another argument: they broke the secrecy law..

Still, I think in this case and now, it is worth 'breaking the secrecy law' to clarify this fact.. and a wish a proper journalist does it right now,  for Madeleine's sake!

Journalists could do whatever they like for Madeleines sake, I doubt that she would know very much about it. Sadly.

[VIXTE]

Journalists could do whatever they like for Madeleines sake, I doubt that she would know very much about it. Sadly.

That is your problem, not mine..

As if she comes from all of this alive, then I can imagine what would feel like being under your skin.

[Redblossom]

Me and you interpret this differently. We understand it differently. This is why I said the further clarification is needed and only the newspapers with good credentials can clarify this now.. so it is clear and not prone to different interpretations.

Nothng to clarify, the mccanns are not regarded as suspects in the particular new line(s) of inquiry that got the case reopened by the PJ, thats all, all there in black and white.

Edited to remove double word posting

[John]

I have moved the previous posts so that members can debate this issue.

The way I understand it presently is that they are not considered suspects at the moment in relation to any crime in Portugal.  As the investigation continues however and as we have seen in countless other cases, the emphases could change if evidence is found to suggest otherwise.

[Mr Gray]

I have moved the previous posts so that members can debate this issue.

The way I understand it presently is that they are not considered suspects at the moment in relation to any crime in Portugal.  As the investigation continues however and as we have seen in countless other cases, the emphases could change if evidence is found to suggest otherwise.

Of course if any new evidence arises things could change...however if there is no evidence after seven yrs Ifeel it highly unlikely anything will surface now

[John]

Of course if any new evidence arises things could change...however if there is no evidence after seven yrs Ifeel it highly unlikely anything will surface now

Does that include Madeleine?

[Mr Gray]

Does that include Madeleine?

from what I have heard the evidence SY are working on was already in the files..just not investigated properly because the PJ were concentrating on the parents...therefore I feel the parents have already been thoroughly investigated