Author Topic: Tavares Report wrongly claims EVRD Eddie alerted within the boot of the hire car  (Read 96216 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
The bottom line remains in this case.

The forensic evidence was inconclusive.

The possibility that Madeleine suffered a fatal accident cannot be ignored or dismissed.

ferryman

  • Guest
he bottom line remains in this case.

The forensic evidence was inconclusive.

The possibility that Madeleine suffered a fatal accident cannot be ignored or dismissed.

There was no forensic evidence.

The forensics were discredited.

stephen25000

  • Guest
There was no forensic evidence.

The forensics were discredited.

The forensics were inconclusive, no more, no less.

Offline Mr Gray

Of course you do.

Now what is your agenda, other than representing the mccanns ? 8)-)))

The agenda for some of us is to try and get to the truth

Offline Mr Gray

That is what they continue to do Anne, and then you have to consider what or who  is behind the motivation for the continued attacks.

Its continued defence...not attacks ..defence of two innocent parents who are relentlessly attacked on the net...whats the motivation for that

Offline Mr Gray

Luckily for Ferryman and others like him, Martin really could not give a toss what is said about him.  He knows he did his job properly and he knows that his dogs did too :)  Might call him to give him a giggle at the latest round of strawclutching going on though lol.

We all know what the dogs did and what they found...its only ill informed posters like you trying to show that the dogs did more than what grime has said

Offline Carana

Luckily for Ferryman and others like him, Martin really could not give a toss what is said about him.  He knows he did his job properly and he knows that his dogs did too :)  Might call him to give him a giggle at the latest round of strawclutching going on though lol.

Are you suggesting that Grime would "giggle" at whatever you tell him about in a private conversation between the two of you in a case under investigation?

I'm not sure that you are doing him any favours.*

* ETA in the sense of enhancing his reputation.
« Last Edit: March 07, 2014, 09:27:12 PM by Carana »

Offline Mr Gray

Are you suggesting that Grime would "giggle" at whatever you tell him about in a private conversation between the two of you in a case under investigation?

I'm not sure that you are doing him any favours.*

* ETA in the sense of enhancing his reputation.

 Grime knows of this forum...as John has contacted him...any suggestion that Grime would speak to anyone who divulged his personal thoughts on this forum is plain bonkers

Offline pegasus

wake up stephen..not attacks ... I'm actually defending what Grime says
Without taking sides, just wondering who on the 6thAugust in Portimao drove the car from the cafe rendevous to the garage? (If it was a PJ then that would be an extra person who handled the keycard).
« Last Edit: March 07, 2014, 10:30:17 PM by pegasus »

Offline Mr Gray

Without taking sides, just wondering who on the 6th drove the car from the cafe to the garage? (If it was a PJ then that would be an extra person who handled the keycard).

of course it would.. and I bet he didn't wear one of those white silly suits that uk police wear

Offline pegasus

For the short drive from cafe to garage even if there was a PJ driver it would be easy to put on some of those forensic gloves would greatly reduce the (theoretical) possibility of scent transfer hand to keycard.

Offline sadie

For the short drive from cafe to garage even if there was a PJ driver it would be easy to put on some of those forensic gloves would greatly reduce the (theoretical) possibility of scent transfer hand to keycard.
But did they? 

Offline John

There was no forensic evidence.

The forensics were discredited.

Those expressions are mutually exclusive   8-)(--)

In fact there was lots of forensic evidence but little proof of anything.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

ferryman

  • Guest
Those expressions are mutually exclusive   8-)(--)

In fact there was lots of forensic evidence but little proof of anything.

For example, there is forensic evidence that Gerry drove the car.

But that is "discredited" in the sense that it tells us nothing about Madeleine's fate; also in the sense the alert (to Gerry's blood) was, at one point, wrongly interpreted as indicative of the scent of Madeleine's deceased remains.

Offline Carana

Without taking sides, just wondering who on the 6thAugust in Portimao drove the car from the cafe rendevous to the garage? (If it was a PJ then that would be an extra person who handled the keycard).

Was it driven or towed?