Author Topic: Tavares Report wrongly claims EVRD Eddie alerted within the boot of the hire car  (Read 96153 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ferryman

  • Guest
IMO:
Eddie bark with head in air = residual scent.
Eddie bark with head down = tangible source.

Source: Processos IX pages 2473-2483
"The first alert was given with the dog's head in the air without a positive area
being identified. This is the alert given by him when there is no tangible
evidence to be located only the remaining scent.
The second alert was one where a definitive area was evident."

Eddie's reaction to the Renault was to a tangible source (spots of Gerry's blood). 

Eddie turned and faced Grime and barked, head in the air.

Offline Angelo222

Eddie's reaction to the Renault was to a tangible source (spots of Gerry's blood). 

Eddie turned and faced Grime and barked, head in the air.

It wasn't proven that Eddie's alert related only to the ignition card since the dog wasn't deployed after the card was removed.  If I'm honest I find the whole silly mess riddled with inconsistencies and maybes.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

ferryman

  • Guest
It wasn't proven that Eddie's alert related only to the ignition card since the dog wasn't deployed after the card was removed.  If I'm honest I find the whole silly mess riddled with inconsistencies and maybes.

That's not true.

Eddie was invited to react to the ignition key a second time, separately and apart from the car, hidden inside a sand box, and did so.

Offline Angelo222

That's not true.

Eddie was invited to react to the ignition key a second time, separately and apart from the car, hidden inside a sand box, and did so.

I am aware of that but was he invited to check out the car with the key card removed?  No

One BIG mess IYAM   @)(++(*

There could have been cadaverine in the car but Grime failed to prove it one way or another.
« Last Edit: March 13, 2014, 08:53:55 AM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

ferryman

  • Guest
I am aware of that but was he invited to check out the car with the key card removed?  No

One BIG mess IYAM   @)(++(*

There could have been cadaverine in the car but Grime failed to prove it one way or another.

The biggest anomaly of the lot is 10 cars inspected simultaneously.

There was an innocent scent in the Renault.

There might easily have been in any of the other 9 cars.

Offline Angelo222

The biggest anomaly of the lot is 10 cars inspected simultaneously.

There was an innocent scent in the Renault.

There might easily have been in any of the other 9 cars.

We can't say there was an innocent scent in the car because Eddie never checked it out with the contaminated key card removed.  A huge oversight IMO.

The Scenic should have been isolated for a period of time with the keycard removed and then retested properly.  No doubt time and money were the determining factors.
« Last Edit: March 13, 2014, 09:31:44 AM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Carana

We can't say there was an innocent scent in the car because Eddie never checked it out with the contaminated key card removed.  A huge oversight IMO.

The Scenic should have been isolated for a period of time with the keycard removed and then retested properly.  No doubt time and money were the determining factors.

Hmm. My understanding is that the purpose of deploying Eddie was to find indications, via the alerts, to narrow down where the cops were supposed to search for potential forensic evidence and Keela was to narrow down the area even further if blood was marked - as that is what saves time and money.

Whatever past or future successes they had, in this case, the forensic evidence turned out to be insignificant.

I find the general concept interesting and can (or has been) furthered refined since, but reading anything more into Eddie's alerts than a general whiff of a potentially interesting scent for closer examination seems exaggerated, IMO.

ferryman

  • Guest
We can't say there was an innocent scent in the car because Eddie never checked it out with the contaminated key card removed.  A huge oversight IMO.

The Scenic should have been isolated for a period of time with the keycard removed and then retested properly.  No doubt time and money were the determining factors.

Give the poor dog a break.

How hard did Grime have to work to get a reaction out of Eddie with the ignition key in the car?

ferryman

  • Guest
Going back to thehead up or head down question, in which direction was Eddie's head pointing for his alerts in the gym, where blood had been ruled out by the prior inspection of Keela?

Offline Mr Gray

In reality none of these threads matter because Grime has told us that the dogs are not 100% reliable...so just how reliable are they..nobody really knows

ferryman

  • Guest
In reality none of these threads matter because Grime has told us that the dogs are not 100% reliable...so just how reliable are they..nobody really knows

Certainly, Grime should have said that.

I'm not quite sure that he did.

stephen25000

  • Guest
The actual reality is the dogs did indicate, and it is more than possible they indicated to the remains of Madeleine.

Offline Benice

In reality none of these threads matter because Grime has told us that the dogs are not 100% reliable...so just how reliable are they..nobody really knows

I don't see how any claim of 100% accuracy can be proved.   If a dog was sent into a field to search - and didn't alert then the handler would assume there was nothing there to alert to.      However without digging up the whole field -  what he cannot know is whether there was something there- and the dog had simply missed it.

I'm impressed by all sniffer dogs, but IMO one of the main reasons why false alerts can happen is when the dog is affected by the beliefs of the handler.   i.e. unconscious cueing.  This has been proved to happen in tests, and Grime acknowledges that it is a reason for false alerts.

Unless Grime and his dogs had been subjected to such testing - then he cannot possibly know for certain whether this could apply in his own case - as the very fact that such cueing is unconscious means that he wouldn't know he was doing it in the first place.

Anyone who has a dog will know they can pick up on the slightest, tiniest changes in body language.

 
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline John

In reality none of these threads matter because Grime has told us that the dogs are not 100% reliable...so just how reliable are they..nobody really knows

Is anything 100% reliable in the world Dave?   Surely it is a case of striving for the best possible scenario?
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

The actual reality is the dogs did indicate, and it is more than possible they indicated to the remains of Madeleine.

Come on Stephen, in reality it could have been many substances he was alerting to.  Harsh reality is nobody will ever know.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.