Author Topic: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?  (Read 144902 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline pegasus

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #225 on: March 11, 2014, 12:24:25 AM »
I am interested in  checking the time of the sighting primarily from the Dolphin credit card transaction and the Kelly till cash transaction/transactions.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #226 on: March 11, 2014, 09:45:12 PM »
I thought in his original statement smith didnt see the suspects face

Offline Anna

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #227 on: March 11, 2014, 09:56:10 PM »
I thought in his original statement smith didnt see the suspects face

He said he was clean shaven, didn't wear glasses and had a normal complexion, but the light was poor.

http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post534.html#p534
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #228 on: March 11, 2014, 09:58:46 PM »
He said he was clean shaven, didn't wear glasses and had a normal complexion, but the light was poor.

http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post534.html#p534

could be anybody

Offline pegasus

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #229 on: March 11, 2014, 11:51:26 PM »
could be anybody
It was definitely a male who at that moment was wearing trousers of a colour similar to cream .
Surely that rules out every male who at that moment was wearing blue jeans.


Offline Carana

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #230 on: March 13, 2014, 11:41:22 AM »
It was definitely a male who at that moment was wearing trousers of a colour similar to cream .
Surely that rules out every male who at that moment was wearing blue jeans.

Interesting point...

Offline sadie

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #231 on: March 13, 2014, 07:40:06 PM »
It was definitely a male who at that moment was wearing trousers of a colour similar to cream .
Surely that rules out every male who at that moment was wearing blue jeans.
Could they have been white?  New white decorators overalls with a jacket over?  Would fit into SY theory by the sound of it.  Weren't they decorators?

And am I imagining it or was there a report on here very rtecently , or maybe in the files, of three road sweepers wearing white overalls / boiler suits ?

Offline Carana

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #232 on: March 13, 2014, 07:49:45 PM »
Could they have been white?  New white decorators overalls with a jacket over?  Would fit into SY theory by the sound of it.  Weren't they decorators?

And am I imagining it or was there a report on here very rtecently , or maybe in the files, of three road sweepers wearing white overalls / boiler suits ?

I doubt that whoever it was was wearing a boiler suit, Sadie. Even if someone had just been wearing the bottom half, covered by a jacket, well after dark, might it have attracted attention.

Offline sadie

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #233 on: March 13, 2014, 07:55:21 PM »
I doubt that whoever it was was wearing a boiler suit, Sadie. Even if someone had just been wearing the bottom half, covered by a jacket, well after dark, might it have attracted attention.
Yep, you are right, Carana

Offline Anna

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #234 on: March 13, 2014, 08:21:05 PM »
Yep, you are right, Carana

Lady in 5a from 31 march 2007 They were road sweepers wearing outfits that looked like surgical outfits , so probably green. This lady's daughter cut her chin at the crèche and she thinks it had nearly stopped bleeding when she collectedher, but took her to a doctor in PDL and had it stitched.

http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post2887.html#p2887
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline sadie

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #235 on: March 13, 2014, 08:31:22 PM »
Lady in 5a from 31 march 2007 They were road sweepers wearing outfits that looked like surgical outfits , so probably green. This lady's daughter cut her chin at the crèche and she thinks it had nearly stopped bleeding when she collectedher, but took her to a doctor in PDL and had it stitched.

http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post2887.html#p2887
@)(++(* You are right too !

Thanks Anna

Offline Carana

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #236 on: March 14, 2014, 12:40:19 PM »
Wearing a boiler suit / painting overalls wouldn't stand out to me during the day, but I'd probably notice it late in the evening.

Offline sadie

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #237 on: March 14, 2014, 09:18:52 PM »
Wearing a boiler suit / painting overalls wouldn't stand out to me during the day, but I'd probably notice it late in the evening.
Assuming they wear the same type of painting gear that our guys in the UK wear, I think you are right Carana.  They are not tailored enough

Offline pegasus

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #238 on: March 16, 2014, 02:14:40 AM »
Interesting point...
Two T9statements state (correctly I believe) was wearing blue jeans.
Two of the Smith group statements certainly rule out blue jeans.
Logical deduction is: not same person.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2014, 02:44:23 PM by pegasus »

Silkywhiskers

  • Guest
Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #239 on: March 17, 2014, 01:42:44 AM »
Two T9statements state (correctly I believe) was wearing blue jeans.
Two of the Smith group statements certainly rule out blue jeans.
Logical deduction is: not same person.

either that or, one group is not telling the truth.