When I first saw that clip the thing which struck me was that the child did not awaken or protest enabling the man to carry out the kidnap unimpeded.
Even if she had wakened, who would have taken notice of a 'father' and his crying 'daughter'.
Which makes the zigzagging path of Smithman, all the more curious.
Who would stride into an apartment, abduct a corpse, then zig zag all over PDL trying to avoid prying eyes, when he hadn't been seen by ANYONE when he was NOT zigzagging?
He apparently entered 5a completely unnoticed, then got noticed afterwards.
Was he zig zagging BEFORE he "abducted" Madeleine? No, apparently not, Team McCann claim he walzted straight through an unlocked door in full sight of where they sat at the Tapas bar.
Allegedly.
Ridiculous.
Abductor man walking with a child WOULD have blended into the background.
Abductor man zig zagging and ducking and weaving - someone saw him.
Why the change of tactic? Walk in boldly in full sight of the parents (so they claimed) then become a moonwalking quick stepper when he has his prize and is getting away successfully?