Author Topic: Sheila's fingerprints were not on any bullets  (Read 32684 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline John

Re: Sheila's fingerprints were not on any bullets
« Reply #60 on: August 06, 2012, 02:57:43 PM »
You have to appreciate Barry that there is a wealth of evidence which supports the fact that Sheila was not downstairs after the attack on Nevill, was not seen in the kitchen by a police officer and never moved after the first shot.  This evidence is well sourced and has been debated over many years.

Can I ask you a question Barry. If someone shot you in the neck with a .22 rifle at point blank range what is the first thing you do with your fingers...assuming of course that you ever regained consciousness?
« Last Edit: August 06, 2012, 03:00:07 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline starryian

Re: Sheila's fingerprints were not on any bullets
« Reply #61 on: August 06, 2012, 03:43:17 PM »
Apparently, JB walks and talks with his "dad" every day. After 27 years. The "dad" that he stole from. The dad that he hated. "I f..king hate my parents."

It's not looking very good, is it?

Could it be guilt or even remorse has set in in his old age?   >@@(*&)
No I really dont think Bamber is capable of remorse John and certainly not guilt. If he is doing this it is for effect. His duplicity knows no bounds.
Good morning peeps >

I don't think Jeremy is capable of remorse or any other form of reparation for what he did.   All that I ever read authored by him is about himself basically .... ME ME ME     Has he ever written about his father or mother or murdered nephews with any sentiment or does his work only relate to writing propaganda for his official website???
An excellent point mark,
Bamber has never, not once, ever written about his family or expressed any sentiments about them at all that I have read. His sentiments are always soley focused on one person and one person olny - himself.
He is almost certainly completely unable to empathise with another human being, show any remorse or guilt for what he has done. However, this is totally true-to-form.

And I will bet he blames his murdered kin for his own demise. Assuming of course that he has any feelings at all.
Absolutely right John, he always blames the relatives of family at length and copiously.
To this day he never loses an opportunity to slip in a sentence that points the finger squarely at Sheila.
The man is mentally unbalanced and in my opinion (for all that's worth) he is a classic example of a psychopath. He will never accept responsibility for his own actions. An absolutely worthless, lying, murderous, self-centred manipulative oxygen thief.
At least they cant accuse me of sugar-coating anything :-)
Starryian..

Offline James

Re: Sheila's fingerprints were not on any bullets
« Reply #62 on: August 06, 2012, 04:47:29 PM »
Does anyone think Bamber will ever see the light of day again even when he is an old old man?   8-)(--)

Offline Milly

Re: Sheila's fingerprints were not on any bullets
« Reply #63 on: August 06, 2012, 04:49:30 PM »
Neil Grahame Bellis and Noddy Grahame Belton have a sort of ring to them.   8**8:/:

Ding dong   @)(++(*

Barry Clark

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's fingerprints were not on any bullets
« Reply #64 on: August 06, 2012, 05:02:34 PM »
You have to appreciate Barry that there is a wealth of evidence which supports the fact that Sheila was not downstairs after the attack on Nevill, was not seen in the kitchen by a police officer and never moved after the first shot.  This evidence is well sourced and has been debated over many years.

Can I ask you a question Barry. If someone shot you in the neck with a .22 rifle at point blank range what is the first thing you do with your fingers...assuming of course that you ever regained consciousness?

John -  I wrote "I don't know that (Sheila) moved between rooms with a shattered throat" & "moving between rooms, that sounds like guess work" - so please tell me why  I have to appreciate there is a wealth of evidence supporting the theory that Sheila was not downstairs after the attack on her father - what is it that I have introduced to the debate that makes you think I don't already appreciate this?

You can of course ask me what the first thing I would do with my fingers if shot by with a .22 rifle, however the question and answer are totally irrelevant to the thread and it is clear that conjecture is not understood by some readers so I don' think it would be at all helpful to add more.

Offline James

Re: Sheila's fingerprints were not on any bullets
« Reply #65 on: August 06, 2012, 05:11:40 PM »
You have to appreciate Barry that there is a wealth of evidence which supports the fact that Sheila was not downstairs after the attack on Nevill, was not seen in the kitchen by a police officer and never moved after the first shot.  This evidence is well sourced and has been debated over many years.

Can I ask you a question Barry. If someone shot you in the neck with a .22 rifle at point blank range what is the first thing you do with your fingers...assuming of course that you ever regained consciousness?

John -  I wrote "I don't know that (Sheila) moved between rooms with a shattered throat" & "moving between rooms, that sounds like guess work" - so please tell me why  I have to appreciate there is a wealth of evidence supporting the theory that Sheila was not downstairs after the attack on her father - what is it that I have introduced to the debate that makes you think I don't already appreciate this?

You can of course ask me what the first thing I would do with my fingers if shot by with a .22 rifle, however the question and answer are totally irrelevant to the thread and it is clear that conjecture is not understood by some readers so I don' think it would be at all helpful to add more.
Are you being purposely obtuse Barry?

Barry Clark

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's fingerprints were not on any bullets
« Reply #66 on: August 06, 2012, 05:18:17 PM »
No James, not purposely. Perhaps you can help me get to the point, what is it I am supposed to say?

Offline starryian

Re: Sheila's fingerprints were not on any bullets
« Reply #67 on: August 06, 2012, 09:29:27 PM »
Does anyone think Bamber will ever see the light of day again even when he is an old old man?   8-)(--)
Not a chance. He will never leave prison. The seriousness of his crimes is so appalling that they will never even consider him for parole - no matter what age he is.
Starryian..

Offline John

Re: Sheila's fingerprints were not on any bullets
« Reply #68 on: August 06, 2012, 11:07:32 PM »
You have to appreciate Barry that there is a wealth of evidence which supports the fact that Sheila was not downstairs after the attack on Nevill, was not seen in the kitchen by a police officer and never moved after the first shot.  This evidence is well sourced and has been debated over many years.

Can I ask you a question Barry. If someone shot you in the neck with a .22 rifle at point blank range what is the first thing you do with your fingers...assuming of course that you ever regained consciousness?

John -  I wrote "I don't know that (Sheila) moved between rooms with a shattered throat" & "moving between rooms, that sounds like guess work" - so please tell me why  I have to appreciate there is a wealth of evidence supporting the theory that Sheila was not downstairs after the attack on her father - what is it that I have introduced to the debate that makes you think I don't already appreciate this?

You can of course ask me what the first thing I would do with my fingers if shot by with a .22 rifle, however the question and answer are totally irrelevant to the thread and it is clear that conjecture is not understood by some readers so I don' think it would be at all helpful to add more.

It's just a simple question Barry so humour me.

If someone shot you in the neck with a .22 rifle at point blank range what is the first thing you would do...assuming of course that you ever regained consciousness?

Its isn't a trick question, rather a serious one.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Barry Clark

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's fingerprints were not on any bullets
« Reply #69 on: August 06, 2012, 11:41:29 PM »
The serious answer is I don't know what I would do if shot in the neck by any calibre weapon, I can only imagine my reaction would depend on a combination of the pain experienced and the circumstances of the event. Would it help if I said I would touch my wound?

Offline Andrea

Re: Sheila's fingerprints were not on any bullets
« Reply #70 on: August 06, 2012, 11:44:25 PM »
That is probably what i would do! Put my hand up to the wound, dont most of us do that when we are injured or in pain?

Offline John

Re: Sheila's fingerprints were not on any bullets
« Reply #71 on: August 06, 2012, 11:48:11 PM »
The serious answer is I don't know what I would do if shot in the neck by any calibre weapon, I can only imagine my reaction would depend on a combination of the pain experienced and the circumstances of the event. Would it help if I said I would touch my wound?

There you go...that wasn't hard was it?

Now seriously that is exactly what you would do, touch the wound as it would be stinging like hell!

In Sheila's case there was no sign that she had touched her neck, not a single smudge of blood on her neck or any on her fingers tips.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

Re: Sheila's fingerprints were not on any bullets
« Reply #72 on: August 06, 2012, 11:51:29 PM »
That is probably what i would do! Put my hand up to the wound, dont most of us do that when we are injured or in pain?

People don't realise that a bullet is extremely hot and will create a searing pain wherever it ends up.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline starryian

Re: Sheila's fingerprints were not on any bullets
« Reply #73 on: August 06, 2012, 11:52:12 PM »
The serious answer is I don't know what I would do if shot in the neck by any calibre weapon, I can only imagine my reaction would depend on a combination of the pain experienced and the circumstances of the event. Would it help if I said I would touch my wound?

There you go...that wasn't hard was it?

Now seriously that is exactly what you would do, touch the wound as it would be stinging like hell!

In Sheila's case there was no sign that she had touched her neck, not a single smudge of blood on her neck or any on her fingers tips.
John,
Grahame has categorically denied he has ever visited this forum. Some poster on the other forum has called him out on that. have you any proof that he has been on here?  I want to show him for the liar that he is.
Starryian..

jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's fingerprints were not on any bullets
« Reply #74 on: August 07, 2012, 12:00:35 AM »
Tim

Is that what I am Tim tolerated???

I thought John welcomed me with open arms???

You're a mod aren't you why don't you just ban me??

You don't know anything about me so stop going on about villas and families and I won't talk about your personal details

Try not to be so Mr Angry all the time Patti was being nice to you




As far as I know,  anything Grahame knows about regarding this forum is what everyone tells him.  I have told him loads what has been written on here about him and he didn't know