DCI Redwood now admits Madeleine may not have left the apartment alive.

[John]

Can you link to where he says this?

www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_PERSONAL.htm

[Luz]

None of these people are suspects, merely people of interest.
Apparently Redwood has a list of some 500 known paedophiles to work through, so he'll probably be at it until he draws his pension.

Actually there are 530 registered sex offenders (a minority are paedophiles) that UK put on several countries instead of in prison, payed by British taxpayers, enjoying the sunny mediterranean beaches, and without those countries' authorities knowledge. Some of those are on the files the PJ was asked to suppress from the case files that were released to the public.

If Redwood/NSY keeps putting out false information, maybe CNN, Al Jazeera, Russian Today & other independent TV channels will have a field day soon when they receive those "secret files".

To keep on topic. If Redwood now admits that maybe "Madeleine didn't leave the apartment the way" «they wanted us to believe», it's because he knows what really happened and is preparing the ground for the truth.

[Luz]

What's a relief is that, resolved or re-archived in Portugal, the investigation will give place to the publicizing of the process and, I bet that, this time no files will be suppressed to save face to NSY, Home Office or Mr. David Cameron.
Dead or alive, found or unfound, inquiries obey deadlines....Soon we will have news.

[pathfinder73]

Once again we're going back to the daily routine change before 7pm which you have to investigate after cadaver scent alerts. And if you like contradictions then read KM & DP statements about his visit.

[colombosstogey]

So the guardian article has been corrected:

http://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2014/mar/21/corrections-and-clarifications

To clarify: those quoted words actually came after Redwood had referred to the assumption that Madeleine had been abducted. However, Redwood did say during the same press conference that police were considering the possibility that Madeleine was not alive when taken from the apartment as well as the possibility that she was.

So basically now they are looking at the fact she may have died in the apartment, but then she might not have.

[stephen25000]

I take it that's a "no", then ...

No ferryman.

Provide the video links etc., and I will answer.

It is you saying NO, and continuing to answer the question I have asked you for years.

P.S. A 'pedro' style answer is insufficient.

[Wonderfulspam]

So the guardian article has been corrected:

http://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2014/mar/21/corrections-and-clarifications

To clarify: those quoted words actually came after Redwood had referred to the assumption that Madeleine had been abducted. However, Redwood did say during the same press conference that police were considering the possibility that Madeleine was not alive when taken from the apartment as well as the possibility that she was.

So basically now they are looking at the fact she may have died in the apartment, but then she might not have.

Thankfully though Madeleine is a real, living, findable child.

Which is reassurring to know, as I was prevoiusly of the opinion that she was a synthetic, deceased, untraceable adult.

[Serendipity]

Thankfully though Madeleine is a real, living, findable child.

Which is reassurring to know, as I was prevoiusly of the opinion that she was a synthetic, deceased, untraceable adult.

So nothing has changed from that atatement then.  They merely clarified and reiterated the possibility that she was not alive BEFORE leaving 5a, something that they have not done before as previously all statements simply said that they think that she may or may not be alive and did not pinpoint a timescale.

[Cariad]

So the guardian article has been corrected:

http://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2014/mar/21/corrections-and-clarifications

To clarify: those quoted words actually came after Redwood had referred to the assumption that Madeleine had been abducted. However, Redwood did say during the same press conference that police were considering the possibility that Madeleine was not alive when taken from the apartment as well as the possibility that she was.

So basically now they are looking at the fact she may have died in the apartment, but then she might not have.

UMMM... did everybody miss this?

This article was amended on 21 March 2014. The earlier version stated that Detective Chief Inspector Andy Redwood had said the assumption that Madeleine had been alive when she left the apartment " on"may not follow with all our thinking the case. To clarify: those quoted words actually came after Redwood had referred to the assumption that Madeleine had been abducted. However, Redwood did say during the same press conference that police were considering the possibility that Madeleine was not alive when taken from the apartment as well as the possibility that she was.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/mar/19/madeleine-mccann-police-intruder-girls-algarve

So he actually said that she may not have been abducted and that she may not have been alive when she left the apartment!

Jesus! That is big news!

[Wonderfulspam]

UMMM... did everybody miss this?

This article was amended on 21 March 2014. The earlier version stated that Detective Chief Inspector Andy Redwood had said the assumption that Madeleine had been alive when she left the apartment " on"may not follow with all our thinking the case. To clarify: those quoted words actually came after Redwood had referred to the assumption that Madeleine had been abducted. However, Redwood did say during the same press conference that police were considering the possibility that Madeleine was not alive when taken from the apartment as well as the possibility that she was.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/mar/19/madeleine-mccann-police-intruder-girls-algarve

So he actually said that she may not have been abducted and that she may not have been alive when she left the apartment!

Jesus! That is big news!

But if she was murdered, before being removed & disposed of by smelly binman guy, then it's not really abduction is it, and that's what he meant....is the kind of rebuttal we are likely to see.

[Sherlock Holmes]

Whatever DCI Redwood said there could be other possibilities a bungled burglary or bungled attempted abduction that went horribly wrong and it wouldn’t be for the first time either.  Whatever it’s time we all kept an open mind not jump to conclusions because that’s what suits OUR particular ‘theory’.

Thank you for that important reminder, PV.

Unfortunately, things have become so polarised in the Madeleine case that it is hard for people - with the best will in the world-  to do that.

Often when a new piece of 'evidence' comes along, it is shoehorned into one theory or another, rather being evaluated on its own merits.

[Sherlock Holmes]

But if she was murdered, before being removed & disposed of by smelly binman guy, then it's not really abduction is it, and that's what he meant....is the kind of rebuttal we are likely to see.

Technically that would not be abduction - or would it? Is that splitting hairs, or a true distinction?

[Eleanor]

Andy Redwood is hardly likely to even suggest that The McCanns are involved in the death of their daughter, on television, in the middle of a Crimewatch Programme.

[jassi]

Andy Redwood is hardly likely to even suggest that The McCanns are involved in the death of their daughter, on television, in the middle of a Crimewatch Programme.

   Too right, he isn't.  Professional suicide and financial ruin would be staring him the face.

[Mr Gray]

Andy Redwood is hardly likely to even suggest that The McCanns are involved in the death of their daughter, on television, in the middle of a Crimewatch Programme.

isn't this what amaral did...though not on crimewatch