Author Topic: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?  (Read 355022 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1605 on: October 04, 2015, 02:56:51 PM »
Might not the Portuguese legal system be more relevant?

Since Portugal does not routinely use sniffer dogs that detect human remains, I doubt they will have legislation governing use of such dogs.

And certainly the Portuguese prosecutors stated that uncorroborated dog-reactions had no evidential value.

As did both Grime and Harrison in their reports.

Offline pegasus

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1606 on: October 04, 2015, 04:28:47 PM »
Since Portugal does not routinely use sniffer dogs that detect human remains, I doubt they will have legislation governing use of such dogs.

And certainly the Portuguese prosecutors stated that uncorroborated dog-reactions had no evidential value.

As did both Grime and Harrison in their reports.
Yes but if any perp is ever tried it is likely to be in Portugal, where portuguese law will determine to what extent the dog alerts will be considered, even if there are no previous portuguese cases to refer to. I see no reason at all to predict the case would be tried in any other country, do you?
« Last Edit: October 04, 2015, 04:31:31 PM by pegasus »

Offline mercury

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1607 on: October 04, 2015, 06:19:45 PM »
Eddie alerted to an item forensically determined neither to be from a human cadaver or a pig.  Therefore Eddie alerted to something outwith his training parameters.  Therefore all Eddie's 'alerts' are questionable and as a result are unreliable.

But that is not quite right is it?

Eddie alerted
The anthropologist identified an item found as being from a child's skull (which by the way was probably outside the tme parameters of the investigation)
The tests conducted by the Lab it was sent to showed it contained collagen
The item was passed around illegally and with no records kept
When it was returned weeks and weeks later  the anthropologist noted it looked like a different item in size texture and weight
The myth was created that the item found was coconut and the rest is history

Unless you are willing to call the Deputy Chief Officer at the time and the anthropologist liars

I have IIRC in the past directed you to a video confirming all the above from the horse's mouth to boot

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1608 on: October 04, 2015, 07:02:21 PM »
But that is not quite right is it?

Eddie alerted
The anthropologist identified an item found as being from a child's skull (which by the way was probably outside the tme parameters of the investigation)
The tests conducted by the Lab it was sent to showed it contained collagen
The item was passed around illegally and with no records kept
When it was returned weeks and weeks later  the anthropologist noted it looked like a different item in size texture and weight
The myth was created that the item found was coconut and the rest is history

Unless you are willing to call the Deputy Chief Officer at the time and the anthropologist liars

I have IIRC in the past directed you to a video confirming all the above from the horse's mouth to boot

Well, would ferryman care to answer that ?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1609 on: October 04, 2015, 07:11:28 PM »
But that is not quite right is it?

Eddie alerted
The anthropologist identified an item found as being from a child's skull (which by the way was probably outside the tme parameters of the investigation)
The tests conducted by the Lab it was sent to showed it contained collagen
The item was passed around illegally and with no records kept
When it was returned weeks and weeks later  the anthropologist noted it looked like a different item in size texture and weight
The myth was created that the item found was coconut and the rest is history

Unless you are willing to call the Deputy Chief Officer at the time and the anthropologist liars

I have IIRC in the past directed you to a video confirming all the above from the horse's mouth to boot

a child's skull does not contain 1.6% collagen

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1610 on: October 04, 2015, 07:12:29 PM »
a child's skull does not contain 1.6% collagen

A coconut has none. 8(0(*

Offline mercury

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1611 on: October 04, 2015, 07:18:01 PM »
a child's skull does not contain 1.6% collagen
The  point is that there was collagen, if you want to argue the percentage toss in a fragment or a whole go ahead but its called deflection

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1612 on: October 04, 2015, 07:18:26 PM »
A coconut has none. 8(0(*

where is the report claiming collagen was found

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1613 on: October 04, 2015, 07:19:06 PM »
The  point is that there was collagen, if you want to argue the percentage toss in a fragment or a whole go ahead but its called deflection

wheres the report

Offline mercury

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1614 on: October 04, 2015, 07:20:59 PM »
wheres the report

Are you callng Lenny Harper a liar?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1615 on: October 04, 2015, 07:22:59 PM »
Are you callng Lenny Harper a liar?

you mean there is no report

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1616 on: October 04, 2015, 07:23:49 PM »
A coconut has none. 8(0(*

do you have a cite that collagen was present

Offline mercury

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1617 on: October 04, 2015, 07:27:37 PM »
you mean there is no report

Its rude to put words into people's mouths and your assumptions are just that, assumptions

What I meant was exactly what I typed, asking you a question, are you calling him a liar? Must be some reason you won't take the word of the chief officer on the case and demanding reports. I suggest you watch the video of him detailing the facts, he was the person on the ground, after all.


Offline Mr Gray

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1618 on: October 04, 2015, 07:29:29 PM »
Its rude to put words into people's mouths and your assumptions are just that, assumptions

What I meant was exactly what I typed, asking you a question, are you calling him a liar? Must be some reason you won't take the word of the chief officer on the case and demanding reports. I suggest you watch the video of him detailing the facts, he was the person on the ground, after all.

I would need to know what he said...as you have misquoted people in the past....so do you have  a link to a quote or are you just making things up

Offline mercury

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1619 on: October 04, 2015, 07:32:21 PM »
I would need to know what he said...as you have misquoted people in the past....so do you have  a link to a quote or are you just making things up

Yes I do