Author Topic: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.  (Read 284750 times)

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #720 on: January 10, 2015, 12:59:30 PM »
I have answered this already in my responses to other posts but safe to say anyone who lived through that night will have events imprinted in their memory.  Do you realise how embarrassing it is to take part in a reconstitution only to be shown to have been mistaken?  Had Jez been there when the documentary was being made, when Jane was left in tears by Gerry, I wonder what his reaction would have been to have had both of them establish it was he who was mistaken?

Excellent point John.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline John

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #721 on: January 10, 2015, 01:01:30 PM »
So the police would allow the reconstruction to basically be a bunch of people all re-writing the timeline a little bit here a little bit there until it all fitted into place, a process which could take days potentially and that would help find Madeleine's abductor how, exactly?  Or would it simply be an exercise to prove that the McCanns and their friends and the other witnesses who gave statements about the evening were all more or less correct in their original statements?

As someone already pointed out above, a 'reconstitution' would establish who, if anyone, lied, and that in itself could provoke charges.  If it turned up new information about Madeleine's disappearance all the better.

Alfred, can you please use the correct terminology when referring to the reconstitution.  A reconstruction using actors is a completely different matter. TY

« Last Edit: January 10, 2015, 01:04:30 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Carana

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #722 on: January 10, 2015, 01:02:25 PM »
And if they had proved that they weren't the investigation could have been refocused. What is wrong with that ?

How could it have been? The issue at the time was whether to charge one or more of the arguidos or to archive the case - unless Madeleine had suddenly been found or a spontaneous confession / or highly credible new evidence dropped on someone's desk.

The clock was ticking. The due date on the final investigation report had already been exceptionally extended twice (the last one was to process the results of the rogatory interviews).

The law has changed since then to allow more time for ILORs... but that wasn't the case back then.




Offline Carana

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #723 on: January 10, 2015, 01:08:18 PM »
Very true.  The Portuguese example of using a reconstitution (not actors) instead of a reconstruction (using actors) is something we in the UK could learn from.  The confrontation when Robert Murat faced his accusers is also unique to Portugal.

The whole point of a reconstitution is to find the liars and identify those who have for some reason or other been less than forthcoming where the true nature of events are concerned.  You only need to look at the accidental confrontation when Jane Tanner was intentionally usurped by Gerry McCann when she attempted to show how he got his recollection wrong as to where he and Jez were situated that fateful night.  Question is, what else did he get WRONG?

A full reconstitution would reveal the sequence of events on the night Madeleine disappeared.  Who was where, when and why.  It wouldn't take long for any fabricated timeline to fall apart in such circumstances.

Every single person who was known to have been there that night should have been forced to take part in the reconstitution, anyone failing to do so should have been charged with the Portuguese equivalent of attempting to pervert the course of justice.  Had this been done I bet nobody would have refused to take part!

What did the confrontation with Murat prove?

Offline Carana

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #724 on: January 10, 2015, 01:12:45 PM »
As someone already pointed out above, a 'reconstitution' would establish who, if anyone, lied, and that in itself could provoke charges.  If it turned up new information about Madeleine's disappearance all the better.

Alfred, can you please use the correct terminology when referring to the reconstitution.  A reconstruction using actors is a completely different matter. TY




What is the correct terminology in English? I've heard of reconstituted food as in:


reconstitute
/riːˈkɒnstɪˌtjuːt/
verb (transitive)
1.
to restore (food, etc) to its former or natural state or a semblance of it, as by the addition of water to a concentrate: reconstituted lemon juice
2.
to reconstruct; form again



Offline John

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #725 on: January 10, 2015, 01:15:12 PM »
What did the confrontation with Murat prove?

Unfortunately, we don't have a transcript of what was actually said.  However, I would think the detectives came away with their own thoughts on who was mistaken or who wasnt.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2015, 01:21:35 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #726 on: January 10, 2015, 01:17:06 PM »



What is the correct terminology in English? I've heard of reconstituted food as in:


reconstitute
/riːˈkɒnstɪˌtjuːt/
verb (transitive)
1.
to restore (food, etc) to its former or natural state or a semblance of it, as by the addition of water to a concentrate: reconstituted lemon juice
2.
to reconstruct; form again

The Portuguese know it as a reconstitution and that is what we are concerned with.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2015, 01:59:30 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline faithlilly

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #727 on: January 10, 2015, 01:22:09 PM »
How could it have been? The issue at the time was whether to charge one or more of the arguidos or to archive the case - unless Madeleine had suddenly been found or a spontaneous confession / or highly credible new evidence dropped on someone's desk.

The clock was ticking. The due date on the final investigation report had already been exceptionally extended twice (the last one was to process the results of the rogatory interviews).

The law has changed since then to allow more time for ILORs... but that wasn't the case back then.

There was obviously elements of the McCann and friends story the PJ wanted clarified. What was wrong with that ? Why were the group so loath to help ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #728 on: January 10, 2015, 01:26:56 PM »
There was obviously elements of the McCann and friends story the PJ wanted clarified. What was wrong with that ? Why were the group so loath to help ?

for the reasons already discussed a million times

Offline Anna

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #729 on: January 10, 2015, 01:28:05 PM »
There was obviously elements of the McCann and friends story the PJ wanted clarified. What was wrong with that ? Why were the group so loath to help ?

Are you referring to, Jez and the McCanns friends, who could not make it back for the re-con, Faith?
The McCanns agreed to attend.
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline pathfinder73

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #730 on: January 10, 2015, 01:39:35 PM »
Are you referring to, Jez and the McCanns friends, who could not make it back for the re-con, Faith?
The McCanns agreed to attend.

Only after the others had refused. 28 March they will do it if the McCanns agree. 1 May interview below shows they didn't say yes. Answer the question and stop trying to run the investigation. Fat chance  %£&)**#



Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #731 on: January 10, 2015, 01:42:48 PM »
As someone already pointed out above, a 'reconstitution' would establish who, if anyone, lied, and that in itself could provoke charges.  If it turned up new information about Madeleine's disappearance all the better.

Alfred, can you please use the correct terminology when referring to the reconstitution.  A reconstruction using actors is a completely different matter. TY
Perhaps you could remove the word reconstruction from the title of this thread if it is now a proscribed word then.


Done  8((()*/
Edit by editor.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2015, 01:59:00 PM by John »

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #732 on: January 10, 2015, 01:45:34 PM »
As someone already pointed out above, a 'reconstitution' would establish who, if anyone, lied, and that in itself could provoke charges.  If it turned up new information about Madeleine's disappearance all the better.

Alfred, can you please use the correct terminology when referring to the reconstitution.  A reconstruction using actors is a completely different matter. TY
How would a "reconstitution" prove anyone was lying rather than simply mistaken?  Perhaps you could give me an example.

Offline John

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #733 on: January 10, 2015, 01:51:42 PM »
Only after the others had refused. 28 March they will do it if the McCanns agree. 1 May interview below shows they didn't say yes. Answer the question and stop trying to run the investigation. Fat chance  %£&)**#


That'll be a no then which sort of answers some of the aforementioned questions by default.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #734 on: January 10, 2015, 01:53:08 PM »
How would a "reconstitution" prove anyone was lying rather than simply mistaken?  Perhaps you could give me an example.

That is how a detective earns his keep, knowing the difference from professional experience.

Personally, I will never understand how the parents of a missing child wouldn't do all they coud and take part in anything which would assist the investigation regardless of their own insecurities.  I think this fact alone is the reason why so many people feel they were less than helpful when they should have been.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2015, 02:04:10 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.