The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.

[Mr Gray]

SY went to the trouble of producing an age progressed image of Maddie...Redwood has said that on the evidence there is a possibility she is alive....

[Alfred R Jones]

Nothing conclusive has been revealed.

All of the scenarios discussed in the first week are still possible.

That's not what you said in your previous post.  I take it  we can disregard the dog alerts then?

[Lyall]

But that simply isn't true Lyall.  The McCanns and their friends have been ruled out by both SY and the PJ.

I think they say what their lawyers tell them to say, and for good reason. It's unlikely we've seen the last legal action in this case.

[Alfred R Jones]

I think they say what their lawyers tell them to say, and for good reason. It's unlikely we've seen the last legal action in this case.

LOL.  The police are governed by their lawyers now are they?

[Lyall]

That's not what you said in your previous post.  I take it  we can disregard the dog alerts then?

However much some would like them to be they're not conclusive are they.

[Mr Gray]

I think they say what their lawyers tell them to say, and for good reason. It's unlikely we've seen the last legal action in this case.

You do realise in most of Redwoods formal interviews the questions are arranged beforehand...

[Lyall]

LOL.  The police are governed by their lawyers now are they?

 %£&)**# In this case.

[Mr Gray]

%£&)**# In this case.

more speculation based on nothing

[Lyall]

SY went to the trouble of producing an age progressed image of Maddie...Redwood has said that on the evidence there is a possibility she is alive....

There is. All scenarios from the first week are still possible.

[Benice]

As I said earlier: cooperation, willingness to do anything to help find Madeleine, and lack of fear of returning.

Why would you expect them to have any trust in anything the PJ told them after what they had experienced/witnessed in Portugal?     Apart from that - how would any normal person feel knowing that the case had been led by a policemen suspected of serious wrong-doing in his last missing child case, and that his No. 2 was suspected of torturing a witness in one of his previous cases?   And  yet they were both allowed by the Portuguese system to stay in office and conduct yet another case!!   

It would hardly fill you with confidence would it?

I can only assume that people who can't see that have no ability to put themselves in other people's shoes.

[Lyall]

speculation based on nothing...in denial of Redwoods clear statement

And if he'd said the opposite the quote would have been repeated a million times on social media wouldn't it.

The McCanns - and the papers - declared they'd been exonerated in 2008.

Anyone who doesn't stick with that line now - especially anyone as authoritative as the police - risks action.

They don't care when an idiot like me says it. But can you imagine what the uproar would have been if Redwood had said it? Huge!

[Miss Taken Identity]

IIRC learning tables was achieved by constant repetition of said tables.    What has that got to do with 10 people trying to recall what they did at a specific time?      All stuff which at the time of doing them they had no idea they had any need to remember them in any detail.    Can you remember without checking - exactly how many posts you've posted in the last couple of days, who you were responding to and exactly what time you posted them?

I could do better than that: If my neighbour ran banging my door telling me her daughter had been abducted - I would phone the police immediately and I would be able to tell the police everything I did that day-who I spoke to- what I had for dinner- what time I got up...ALL of that and then some, and it wasn't even my daughter!

The fives times table never changed - unlike the timeline... That was the point you missed! whoosh way over the head! lol

The Judiciary at that time needed clarification why can't you accept, that there are still to this day, discrepancies- now they may be innocent and easily explained discrepancies- but why try and make out it was about entrapment? and the McCanns should have been placed on a pedestal. You really do not have a valid argument or produce a reasonable excuse for Maddies parents behavior.

And maybe they 'knew' their  chosen timeline would not stand up to scrutiny and that is why they felt it would be a 'trap'.

Anyway, we will never know. They didn't go!

[Alfred R Jones]

%£&)**# In this case.

Evidence?

[Lyall]

Evidence?

I just case you the evidence: exoneration was declared in 2008, and that declaration was reinforced by the newspapers thousands of times. Everyone must now stick to that line.

Action taken against the Sunday Times is also evidence.

[Alfred R Jones]

And if he'd said the opposite the quote would have been repeated a million times on social media wouldn't it.

The McCanns - and the papers - declared they'd been exonerated in 2008.

Anyone who doesn't stick with that line now - especially anyone as authoritative as the police - risks action.

They don't care when an idiot like me says it. But can you imagine what the uproar would have been if Redwood had said it? Huge!

Don't be absurd.  He would not have said "the McCanns are suspects" he could easily have said "no comment" or "we are starting from the beginning and all possible scenarios are being investigated".  He could not have been sued for saying either of those things.  The fact is he made a categorical statement,leaving no one in any doubt.  See my tag line below.