Are the Tapas Rogatory statements as released by Duarte Levy genuine?

[Jean-Pierre]

I am on record as stating she is biased as recently as a few days ago.  That said though, I doubt very much whether she would waste her time on case files if they were knowingly corrupted.  Gilet has raised a very good point about the rogatory statements but others have responded with equally persuasive responses.

Fair enough.  I think all material from such sources should be treated with caution.  And where an suspected conman is involved, then doubly so. 

[John]

Fair enough.  I think all material from such sources should be treated with caution.  And where an suspected conman is involved, then doubly so.

Absolutely, thanks to gilet for bringing this to our attention.  Makes a change from who got paid for PdL.

[Mr Gray]

A totally different set of circumstances that amounts to GM/DP's word against the Gaspars.

As far as the rog's are concerned we have a stabilising factor with LP's association. If the Tapas 9 were to claim the truth was a lie then it would drag LP into the argument as verification. If disproven it would most likely not get the information removed from the Internet but it would also be all over the Internet that they are not to be trusted.

Has that happened........no. Just a bunch of hopeful McCann apologists clutching at straws.

Argue about Levy's behaviour all you like but discrediting his personality does not in turn discredit what's in the rog's. He simply leaked the information.

Thers no need to clutch at straws...the mccanns are not suspects in either SY or the PJ investigation...that's a very clear signal that only the blind cannot see

[stephen25000]

Thers no need to clutch at straws...the mccanns are not suspects in either SY or the PJ investigation...that's a very clear signal that only the blind cannot see

The case ain't over til the fat lady sings.

...and I don't mean Philomena.

[Mr Gray]

The case ain't over til the fat lady sings.

...and I don't mean Philomena.

in my opinion the case will almost certainly never be solved...but...the McCcanns are not suspects

[jassi]

in my opinion the case will almost certainly never be solved...but...the McCcanns are not suspects

Is that all that matters to you?

[Mr Gray]

Is that all that matters to you?

of course not.  but it is very important.....I was responding to a post by Buzz...you have shown what happens when statements are taken out of context which is happening all the time

[Mr Gray]

Actually you was, as usual deflecting from the matter in hand. The discussion was the validity of the rog's not the validity of the McCanns as suspects which you have inexplicably chosen to drop into the thread. Perhaps because you didn't have a clear enough counter argument to the post of mine which you commented on?

no buzz it was you who introduced the mccanns in your post claiming their supporters were clitching at straws

[Mr Gray]

Still no argument then regarding the validity? Thought so. Never mind I'm sure if you keep arguing about off topic nonsense the post will soon drop a few pages down......that is your usual tactic isn't it?

Theres no argument because we simply don't know...my view is that on the whole they are genuine but with some changes that may make a huge difference. As I have already posted the mccanns seem to be ignoring a lot of libel on the net..it really isnt worth bothering now they have been declared not suspects

[Mr Gray]

Much better Davel. Thank you.

What changes and what difference do those changes make?

unfortunately we don't know. Does Levy want to cause mischief...quite probably

[pathfinder73]

Theres no argument because we simply don't know...my view is that on the whole they are genuine but with some changes that may make a huge difference. As I have already posted the mccanns seem to be ignoring a lot of libel on the net..it really isnt worth bothering now they have been declared not suspects

And it's very strange that Redwood didn't rule Gerry out of the Smith sighting at the same time he cleared Tannerman as being an innocent man. Why didn't Redwood rule Gerry out of the sighting (named by a witness) if he thinks they're not suspects? Why didn't he say an eye witness named Gerry McCann as possibly being this man we're looking for but we can confirm that this wasn't Mr McCann and the witness was mistaken. Maybe you should contact them and ask why Mr McCann hasn't been cleared from that sighting?

[Mr Gray]

And it's very strange that Redwood didn't rule Gerry out of the Smith sighting at the same time he cleared Tannerman as being an innocent man. Why didn't Redwood rule Gerry out of the sighting (named by a witness) if he thinks they're not suspects? Why didn't he say an eye witness named Gerry McCann as possibly being this man we're looking for but we can confirm that this wasn't Mr McCann and the witness was mistaken. Maybe you should contact them and ask why he hasn't been cleared from that sighting?

I wont be contacting anyone...Redwood said the mccanns aren't suspects...I understand smith  has now said he doesn't think it was Gerry...

[pathfinder73]

I wont be contacting anyone...Redwood said the mccanns aren't suspects...I understand smith  has now said he doesn't think it was Gerry...

It doesn't matter what he thinks now as it's on record that he couldn't sleep for days with worry before contacting the authorities and saying the man he seen was possibly the father of Madeleine. And the child the suspect was carrying was a spitting image of her.

[Mr Gray]

It doesn't matter what he thinks now as it's on record that he couldn't sleep for days with worry before contacting the authorities and saying the man he seen was possibly the father of Madeleine. And the child the suspect was carrying was a spitting image of her.

Gerry is not a suspect so Redwood must have ruled him out

[Wonderfulspam]

I wont be contacting anyone...Redwood said the mccanns aren't suspects...I understand smith  has now said he doesn't think it was Gerry...

...I understand smith  has now said he doesn't think it was Gerry...

How could he be certain it wasn't Gerry he saw, when he wasn't certain it was Gerry he saw in the first place.