In the absence of any other detailed non-abduction theory about what happened to Madeleine McCann I thought it might be worth re-visiting Amaral's thesis. With all that we now know about the case, is his thesis at all credible? Does it hang together coherently as a plausible account of events? Is there any evidence that those currently investigating the case are using his thesis as a basis for their investigations?
For Gonçalo Amaral's thesis to work he would have needed to have gathered substantial evidence and that is where it falls down. The accidental death, the removal of the body at such short notice, the refrigeration and subsequent disposal, all conducted under the noses of the worlds Press and media.
Certainly there are inconsistencies in versions of events and other little indicators which Amaral points to as being part of some great conspiracy but without hard evidence none of it can ever amount to anything more than a theory, his theory.