So you're seriously suggesting someone took her but kept her alive for weeks or months around PDL (is that in Edgar's 'lawless hinterland') in the epicentre of Portugal's and arguably the world's most famous missing persons case then at some point in the future killed the child and then, inexplicably, returned to the scene of the crime, and buried her almost next to where she was taken from?
All righty then!
These sorts of posts ( and you make them relentlessly ) are without substance
You persist with the insupportable suggestion that unless a precise and detailed explanation for the McCanns possible involvement in their daughter's disappearance is forthcoming then we are, somehow, obliged to accept their version of events without question
That is non sequitur ... the logic does not follow
It is perfectly reasonable to question that which is questionable without having an 'alternative' explanation to offer
Speaking for myself, I have no idea what happened to that little girl ... but I certainly don't feel that
because I don't know what happened to her I must, necessarily, believe what her parents
say happened to her