So what is the evidence for abduction?

[Benice]

Fiona was NOT the Parent of a missing child.

You beat me to it Sadie.

[sadie]

You beat me to it Sadie.

Great minds 

Twice in the last 5 minutes !


Nigh Night all

[mercury]

So can I take it that you don't believe the McCanns behaved normally and that other parents who thought  their child had been abducted would have immediately started behaving like policemen and not like terrified parents who had just been plunged into every parents worst nightmare.        Pull the other one.

Never said that, how many times do I NEED to tell you, the evidence was trashed  before police  got there ergo yiu cant blame the police, do you  undesrstand?

[Mr Gray]

once the parents have been ruled out....SY say they are not suspects....then abduction is proved on the balance of probabilities

[stephen25000]

once the parents have been ruled out....SY say they are not suspects....then abduction is proved on the balance of probabilities

 


and they don't even know the crime.

Great policing. &%&£(+ &%&£(+ &%&£(+

[Mr Gray]

and they don't even know the crime.

Great policing. &%&£(+ &%&£(+ &%&£(+

do you understand what on the balance of probabilities...they know what the crime is...on the balance of probabilities..

[stephen25000]

do you understand what on the balance of probabilities...they know what the crime is...on the balance of probabilities..

Keep it up dave.

You might convince a few people.

However, after eight years of nothing and no evidence of an abduction, you might want to think again.

[Mr Gray]

Keep it up dave.

You might convince a few people.

However, after eight years of nothing and no evidence of an abduction, you might want to think again.

I'm not interested in convincing anyone...you are mistaken...just posting facts...of course their is evidence to support abduction

[stephen25000]

I'm not interested in convincing anyone...you are mistaken...just posting facts...of course their is evidence to support abduction

Just posting your opinion would be more accurate.

Now where is the carte blanche unassailable evidence of abduction ?

CONVINCE ME.

[Mr Gray]

Just posting your opinion would be more accurate.

Now where is the carte blanche unassailable evidence of abduction ?

CONVINCE ME.

did you read the last post..I'm not interested in convincing anyone....abduction beyond reasonable doubt is a fact based on all the evidence..

[G-Unit]

When the Met ruled Tannerman out they did it by accepting that someone was returning from the night creche when he was actually heading towards it. They also accepted that someone kept the clothes they and their child wore that night for six years and remembered which they were. Hmmm.

If they were as meticulous when examining the parents and their friends it's hardly surprising they managed to rule them out.

As ruling the parents and their friends out also rules out accidental death, there's not much left to consider when using the 'balance of probabilities' test. Either MM left the apartment herself or someone took her. Once you've excluded involvement by the group you can rule out woke and wandered because they said they found all gates and doors closed, which makes that theory unlikely. Because you've ruled out involvement by the group anyone taking her was a stranger. The probability being an abductor or a burglary gone wrong.

The problem is that circumstantial evidence exists which suggests parental involvement.

[stephen25000]

did you read the last post..I'm not interested in convincing anyone....abduction beyond reasonable doubt is a fact based on all the evidence..

I'll make it very simple for you.

What evidence ?

[Carana]

Just posting your opinion would be more accurate.

Now where is the carte blanche unassailable evidence of abduction ?

CONVINCE ME.

There often isn't - unless there's cctv or some vigilant person's smartphone showing someone stuffing a child in the boot of an identifiable car and a thorough forensic examination of an untouched crime scene.

[Mr Gray]

I'll make it very simple for you.

What evidence ?

and I will make it very simple for you...I'M NOT INTERSERTED IN CONVINCING YOU

[stephen25000]

and I will make it very simple for you...I'M NOT INTERSERTED IN CONVINCING YOU

I.e. NO EVIDENCE WORTH A PINCH OF SALT.