Author Topic: So what is the evidence for abduction?  (Read 158133 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #210 on: June 02, 2014, 08:04:05 PM »
Sorry,but IF abduction,why does it have to have been carried out by a stranger?

who else would do it

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #211 on: June 02, 2014, 08:11:36 PM »
We are in a unique position seeking to draw together the three key strands of information about her disappearance," said Redwood.

He unequivocally dismissed the conspiracy theory – promoted by the original Portuguese lead detective Goncalo Amaral – that Madeleine's parents had anything to do with her disappearance.

He said detectives believe Madeleine was abducted in "a criminal act by a stranger".


clipped from a guardian article

Silkywhiskers

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #212 on: June 02, 2014, 08:23:30 PM »
We are in a unique position seeking to draw together the three key strands of information about her disappearance," said Redwood.

He unequivocally dismissed the conspiracy theory – promoted by the original Portuguese lead detective Goncalo Amaral – that Madeleine's parents had anything to do with her disappearance.

He said detectives believe Madeleine was abducted in "a criminal act by a stranger".


clipped from a guardian article

Conveniently neglecting to add the DATE of Andy's little speech, which was at the BEGINNING of Operation Grange, when officially, no one knew anything.

Cute isnt it, when LE tell you what they expect to find before they even begin.

Except,as we now know, the "abductor" theory seems to have been blown totally out of the water by the digs, no matter WHAT Andy said at the beginning.
O

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #213 on: June 03, 2014, 08:36:34 AM »
How can you rule out Madeleine's death in the apartment ?

How can you 'believe' in abduction when there is no evidence to support it, let alone forensics ?

For the record, and as has been said before, a child being carried in someone's arms is not evidence of abduction.

Every possibility will have been looked at....I do rule out death in the apt covered up by the parents for reasons I have previously given...it is pointless going over the same ground again....maddie may have died in the apt at the hands of an intruder...SY agree with my conclusions..

As evidence for abduction...try reading the posts about the car theft where it is well explained
« Last Edit: June 07, 2014, 07:19:33 PM by John »

Offline slartibartfast

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #214 on: June 09, 2014, 01:35:36 AM »
Every possibility will have been looked at....I do rule out death in the apt covered up by the parents for reasons I have previously given...


I.e. You don't believe it.
« Last Edit: September 22, 2014, 05:18:14 PM by John »
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline John

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #215 on: September 22, 2014, 05:18:08 PM »
Now that Summers and Swan have produced their book which Amazon heralds as the most definitive account possible and which supports the parents claim of stranger abduction, a claim which I hasten to add hasn't even been made by Scotland Yard...

So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Last Edit: September 22, 2014, 05:20:56 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #216 on: September 22, 2014, 05:21:50 PM »
Now that Summers and Swan have produced their book which Amazon heralds as the most definitive account possible and which supports the parents claim of stranger abduction, a claim which I hasten to add even Scotland Yard hasn't made...

So what is the evidence for abduction?

First we should decide what the possibilities are...

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #217 on: September 22, 2014, 05:25:12 PM »
Now that Summers and Swan have produced their book which Amazon heralds as the most definitive account possible and which supports the parents claim of stranger abduction, a claim which I hasten to add hasn't even been made by Scotland Yard...

So what is the evidence for abduction?
Based on all the information we know about the events in PdL in May 2007, stranger abduction is the only logical theory, unless you care to put forward a plausible alternative scenario, in which case do present it for us to examine!

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #218 on: September 22, 2014, 05:29:54 PM »
Now that Summers and Swan have produced their book which Amazon heralds as the most definitive account possible and which supports the parents claim of stranger abduction, a claim which I hasten to add hasn't even been made by Scotland Yard...

So what is the evidence for abduction?


I'm interested to know, also (but I ain't gonna buy it & I can't be bothered to read it) how the book has demonstrated that....

'speculation that the McCanns played a role in their daughter's fate, is unfounded'

Someone here must have read it by now, maybe they could fill us in with a quick summary of how it definitely wasn't the McCann's wot dunnit.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Eleanor

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #219 on: September 22, 2014, 05:33:59 PM »

I'm interested to know, also (but I ain't gonna buy it & I can't be bothered to read it) how the book has demonstrated that....

'speculation that the McCanns played a role in their daughter's fate, is unfounded'

Someone here must have read it by now, maybe they could fill us in with a quick summary of how it definitely wasn't the McCann's wot dunnit.

Goodness me.  A half intelligent question. 

I haven't read it, so I can't help.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #220 on: September 22, 2014, 05:59:50 PM »
28 January 2009
Police confirm Prout is no longer suspected of murdering his wife.

10 March
Prout is arrested and charged with murder and appears at Cheltenham Magistrates' Court.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #221 on: September 22, 2014, 06:04:19 PM »
28 January 2009
Police confirm Prout is no longer suspected of murdering his wife.

10 March
Prout is arrested and charged with murder and appears at Cheltenham Magistrates' Court.
So is this evidence for the abduction then?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #222 on: September 22, 2014, 06:11:03 PM »
So is this evidence for the abduction then?

No, I think it's your lot that should be posting that abduction evidence stuff, however, there doesn't appear to much, if any, getting posted at the moment.

There's a reason for that.

It's cos there ain't none.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #223 on: September 22, 2014, 06:15:23 PM »
No, I think it's your lot that should be posting that abduction evidence stuff, however, there doesn't appear to much, if any, getting posted at the moment.

There's a reason for that.

It's cos there ain't none.

The strongest evidence for abduction is the absense of evidence for anything else.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #224 on: September 22, 2014, 06:18:47 PM »
There is a young girl in West London who has gone missing.  Police are treating her disappearance as an abduction / murder.  There is however NO tangible evidence that she has either been abducted OR murdered, however abduction and / or murder seems to be the most logical explanation for her disappearance when looking at all the known facts.  Do our resident "sceptics" have a problem with the police's theory about this girl's fate because there is no actual physical evidence?  Surely they must, as they DO have a problem with the Met's theory about Madeleine McCann also being a case of stranger abduction and / or murder despite the lack of physical evidence.