Author Topic: So what is the evidence for abduction?  (Read 157841 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Carew

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #495 on: July 05, 2015, 06:50:20 PM »
You've obviously forgotten the Op Grange remit which uses the word abduction.

Including "abduction" of a corpse.

Odd word to use in light of comments regarding the possibility that Madeleine may not have been alive when removed from the apartment.

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #496 on: July 05, 2015, 06:52:08 PM »
You've obviously forgotten the Op Grange remit which uses the word abduction.

True, and then Hogan-Howe mentioned investigating the murder of......Perhaps he didn't read the remit?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #497 on: July 05, 2015, 06:54:55 PM »
It does seem BHH wasn't reading the script.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #498 on: July 05, 2015, 06:55:50 PM »
True, and then Hogan-Howe mentioned investigating the murder of......Perhaps he didn't read the remit?
You're probably not aware that some abductions do indeed end in murder, which might explain it.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #499 on: July 05, 2015, 06:56:43 PM »
Seriously?  You have no idea of any action taken by Op Grange since the 2012 announcement?
Not a clue other than reading lots of files, peering into a few holes in PdL last year, appearing on Crime Watch a couple of times, visiting Portugal once a month and having PJ interview a few (11?) bods on their behalf. The press said all sorts of things most if not all of which did not come to pass and DCI Redwood gave a few TV interviews where he went all Norman Collier.
So cutting to the chase we know naff all, apart from a deathly 'ush from a Nicola direction, but we can have fun guessing.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Carew

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #500 on: July 05, 2015, 07:00:40 PM »
You're probably not aware that some abductions do indeed end in murder, which might explain it.

Abduction of a corpse?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #501 on: July 05, 2015, 07:02:08 PM »
Not a clue other than reading lots of files, peering into a few holes in PdL last year, appearing on Crime Watch a couple of times, visiting Portugal once a month and having PJ interview a few (11?) bods on their behalf. The press said all sorts of things most if not all of which did not come to pass and DCI Redwood gave a few TV interviews where he went all Norman Collier.
So cutting to the chase we know naff all, apart from a deathly 'ush from a Nicola direction, but we can have fun guessing.
So we know quite a lot of what they have done  (and one or two things you chose to gloss over including their focus on break ins and sex attacks on holiday apartments in the Algarve) , and none of it apparently focused on the parents of Madeleine McCann.
« Last Edit: July 06, 2015, 10:09:39 AM by John »

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #502 on: July 05, 2015, 07:04:08 PM »
Abduction of a corpse?
Abduction generally means to take by force or coercion.  If the person is already dead then I would use the word "removal".  What point are you trying to make?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #503 on: July 05, 2015, 07:04:40 PM »
So we know quite a lot of what they have done  (and one or two things you chose to gloss over including their focus on break ins and sex attacks on holiday apartments in the Algarve) , and none of it apparently focused on the parents of Madeleine McCann.

For many, it would seem the investigation is clutching at straws.

That's the trouble with a narrow 'investigation'.
« Last Edit: July 06, 2015, 10:09:57 AM by John »

Offline Carew

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #504 on: July 05, 2015, 07:09:33 PM »
Abduction generally means to take by force or coercion.  If the person is already dead then I would use the word "removal".  What point are you trying to make?

..........that maybe hanging tenaciously to the "abduction" word may not reflect all possibilities under consideration?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #505 on: July 05, 2015, 07:19:36 PM »
..........that maybe hanging tenaciously to the "abduction" word may not reflect all possibilities under consideration?
There appear to be two possibilities under consideration 1) that she was abducted and 2) that she was killed in a "burglary / abduction attempt gone wrong" scenario.  What other scenarios do you think the Met are actively considering and what is the evidence to support your belief?

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #506 on: July 05, 2015, 07:26:24 PM »
You're probably not aware that some abductions do indeed end in murder, which might explain it.

Evidence of abduction - none. So it would be a bit of a leap to assume it lead to murder (although most do, of course)
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #507 on: July 05, 2015, 07:33:32 PM »
So we know quite a lot of what they have done  (and one or two things you chose to gloss over including their focus on break ins and sex attacks on holiday apartments in the Algarve) , and none of it apparently focused on the parents of Madeleine McCann.

We know three fifths of five eighths of FA about what they have been doing in reality. We know what has been said at infrequent press conferences and what the press "say he says you say she says they are doing"
Ah yes the sex attacks that allegedly took place miles away. Did the British cops say anything about that and have the PJ interview suspects on their behalf ? That would smack of interfering with police operations in another country so I doubt that happened, the British press notwithstanding.
I have no basis for opinion on the latter point; as I stated we don't know what The MPS are doing. Guess away.

« Last Edit: July 06, 2015, 10:10:23 AM by John »
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #508 on: July 05, 2015, 07:35:32 PM »
Evidence of abduction - none. So it would be a bit of a leap to assume it lead to murder (although most do, of course)
If there was no evidence of abduction then why would the Op Grange remit include the word in its remit? I know you seem to think they were told to - but by whom, exactly - and why?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #509 on: July 05, 2015, 07:39:17 PM »
We know three fifths of five eighths of FA about what they have been doing in reality. We know what has been said at infrequent press conferences and what the press "say he says you say she says they are doing"
Ah yes the sex attacks that allegedly took place miles away. Did the British cops say anything about that and have the PJ interview suspects on their behalf ? That would smack of interfering with police operations in another country so I doubt that happened, the British press notwithstanding.
I have no basis for opinion on the latter point; as I stated we don't know what The MPS are doing. Guess away.
The British cops have spoken about the sex attacks on the Algarve, yes I believe they have.  You are perfectly at liberty to disbelieve everything we are told by the Met and the press about this investigation if it makes things easier for you to maintain your beliefs - that's entirelyyour choice.  My choice is to trust the Met and to believe what they tell us via the media is broadly the truth.  I guess that makes me a clone or a sheeple or whatever term you want to ascribe to me to make you feel smugly superior.