Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories

[puglove]

Yeh I noticed that on the other pathetic forum they reckon Mike has some killer eveidence in his garage. Is that what you think they are going to produce?

Looks like his Waterloo has come at last but then again there is another sift to come possibly.  I will get a chance to post more about this later on.

No, I think what was meant was the photo of Sheila that Mike supposedly has on an old hard drive.

Am I being thick, or is Mike now saying that the scratches under the mantelpiece WERE there on the morning of the 7th? So they weren't done by the relatives?

Can anyone help me on this one, because the silence is deafening. Hasn't Mike always said that the scratches under the mantelpiece were NOT done on the night of the murders, but at a later date by one of the relatives? But for some reason, he's now changed his mind. I know this is how he rolls, but doesn't this undermine a huge point?

Yes he did Shona, he made a big issue about it on a number of occasions.  Is he now saying that it was Sheila who made the marks with the rifle butt??

That photo expert (cant remember his name) said that the scratches weren't in the scene of crimes photos.

I think so, but it's becoming increasingly difficult to decipher exactly what he's trying to say. I presume "Z" told him this, when they were on their scenic tour of the Highlands (via Scandinavia).

[puglove]

Yeh I noticed that on the other pathetic forum they reckon Mike has some killer eveidence in his garage. Is that what you think they are going to produce?

Looks like his Waterloo has come at last but then again there is another sift to come possibly.  I will get a chance to post more about this later on.

No, I think what was meant was the photo of Sheila that Mike supposedly has on an old hard drive.

Am I being thick, or is Mike now saying that the scratches under the mantelpiece WERE there on the morning of the 7th? So they weren't done by the relatives?

Can anyone help me on this one, because the silence is deafening. Hasn't Mike always said that the scratches under the mantelpiece were NOT done on the night of the murders, but at a later date by one of the relatives? But for some reason, he's now changed his mind. I know this is how he rolls, but doesn't this undermine a huge point?

Yes he did Shona, he made a big issue about it on a number of occasions.  Is he now saying that it was Sheila who made the marks with the rifle butt??

That photo expert (cant remember his name) said that the scratches weren't in the scene of crimes photos.

I think so, but it's becoming increasingly difficult to decipher exactly what he's trying to say. I presume "Z" told him this, when they were on their scenic tour of the Highlands (via Scandinavia).

The "photo expert" was Peter Sutherst.   Hmmm.  Mr Kodak!!!

[puglove]

Yeh I noticed that on the other pathetic forum they reckon Mike has some killer eveidence in his garage. Is that what you think they are going to produce?

Looks like his Waterloo has come at last but then again there is another sift to come possibly.  I will get a chance to post more about this later on.

No, I think what was meant was the photo of Sheila that Mike supposedly has on an old hard drive.

Am I being thick, or is Mike now saying that the scratches under the mantelpiece WERE there on the morning of the 7th? So they weren't done by the relatives?

Can anyone help me on this one, because the silence is deafening. Hasn't Mike always said that the scratches under the mantelpiece were NOT done on the night of the murders, but at a later date by one of the relatives? But for some reason, he's now changed his mind. I know this is how he rolls, but doesn't this undermine a huge point?

Yes he did Shona, he made a big issue about it on a number of occasions.  Is he now saying that it was Sheila who made the marks with the tip of the rifle barrel??

That photo expert (cant remember his name) said that the scratches weren't in the scene of crimes photos.

I'd love to know what Hartley and Vic make of this latest rubbish.

[frank50]

Well i dont know the case as well as others on here but this stuff about the logs is surely nonsense. If Mike had logs which could assist Bamber he would have provided them to the CCRC. You dont hold back information like that for some future application. I dont think there is anything else material to come out. If Bamber loses the JR its the end of the road ( although Im sure hell plod on as he has nothing else to do).

Yeh I noticed that on the other pathetic forum they reckon Mike has some killer eveidence in his garage. Is that what you think they are going to produce?

Looks like his Waterloo has come at last but then again there is another sift to come possibly.  I will get a chance to post more about this later on.

No, I think what was meant was the photo of Sheila that Mike supposedly has on an old hard drive.

Am I being thick, or is Mike now saying that the scratches under the mantelpiece WERE there on the morning of the 7th? So they weren't done by the relatives?

Can anyone help me on this one, because the silence is deafening. Hasn't Mike always said that the scratches under the mantelpiece were NOT done on the night of the murders, but at a later date by one of the relatives? But for some reason, he's now changed his mind. I know this is how he rolls, but doesn't this undermine a huge point?

Yes he did Shona, he made a big issue about it on a number of occasions.  Is he now saying that it was Sheila who made the marks with the tip of the rifle barrel??

That photo expert (cant remember his name) said that the scratches weren't in the scene of crimes photos.

I'd love to know what Hartley and Vic make of this latest rubbish.

[Tim Invictus]

Wow the old con Tesco has a new theory (I think!). He now states the scratch marks in the kitchen were afterall made by the rifle but that this happened accidental, sometime prior to the murders!

Nice of Tesco to finally confirm that he does not believe Bamber's photographic 'expert' who tried to say the scratch marks were not present in the crime scene photos but were made sometime later. Thus suggesting fabrication by the relatives.

Now that Tesco does no longer believe that perhaps he will issue an apology to the various relatives who he has many times accused of falsifying the paint scratches!

Tesco you old crank, your life has been at least as wasted as your hero Jeremy's! It will be a good day for the human race when you finally stop sucking up benefits ........ and oxygen!

[John]

Wow the old con Tesco has a new theory (I think!). He now states the scratch marks in the kitchen were afterall made by the rifle but that this happened accidental, sometime prior to the murders!

Nice of Tesco to finally confirm that he does not believe Bamber's photographic 'expert' who tried to say the scratch marks were not present in the crime scene photos but were made sometime later. Thus suggesting fabrication by the relatives.

Now that Tesco does no longer believe that perhaps he will issue an apology to the various relatives who he has many times accused of falsifying the paint scratches!

Tesco you old crank, your life has been at least as wasted as your hero Jeremy's! It will be a good day for the human race when you finally stop sucking up benefits ........ and oxygen!

So is Mike Teskowski saying that their photographic expert Peter Sutherst is now wrong in his determination?  A determination which they made such a song and dance about at the time.



                           Photographic Expert Peter Sutherst.


If I recall correctly, this expert determined that there were no scratch marks on the photographs taken immediately after the murders.  How can someone get something like this so wrong?

[Tim Invictus]

Cheers John. I couldn't remember Peter Sutherst's name and couldn't be arsed to look it up! 

[John]

Cheers John. I couldn't remember Peter Sutherst's name and couldn't be ar..d to look it up! 

?

I had to google it too as it has been a while since his input into this case has been discussed.  This whole argument about the scratch marks on the aga is academic as far as I can see.  The CCRC found it to have no substance and I totally agree.  The family knew that photos of the crime scene had been taken so attempting to perpetrate a fraud by creating them after the fact was a ridiculous notion.  But then again what do we really expect from a burglar who hid in an attic?

Just when I'm on the point, why was Mike Teskowski hiding in a friends attic anyway? It"s not the sort of thing normal law abiding people do is it?

[goatboy]

Have you seen his latest? He reckons that his latest contact (not Z) told him Sheila used the telephone while Jeremy was outside the house with the police and furthermore Sheila spoke to the police on the phone. Let us assume that this is not complete and utter b*llocks for a second (difficult, I know). If we also assume that Tesko's other theories are correct, then the police knew that Sheila was the killer and not Jeremy, yet they still went out of their way to convict Jeremy of the murders even though they knew he couldn't have done it? Including if you believe them coaching Julie Mugford to give a convincing testimony? Surely if they knew what had happened wouldn't it have been easier to close the case as Sheila was obviously the murderer? Who deliberately goes out of their way to make their job as difficult as it could possibly be? Especially the police, whose job is already very difficult? And why? Just because the relatives applied a bit of pressure and got angry? Relatives will always do that and who can blame them? It appears Mike must have lost it. Even Roach thinks he's talking out of his a*se. I'm not sure if Mike really believes this stuff or if it is just an opportunity for him to make "hilarious" dog jokes (he is still standing by the "Sheila barked like a dog" story). Finally, if Sheila really did use the phone then it was a good job she did such a good job of cleaning herself up after her murderous killing spree and left not a trace of blood on the phone...

[John]

Have you seen his latest? He reckons that his latest contact (not Z) told him Sheila used the telephone while Jeremy was outside the house with the police and furthermore Sheila spoke to the police on the phone. Let us assume that this is not complete and utter b*llocks for a second (difficult, I know). If we also assume that Tesko's other theories are correct, then the police knew that Sheila was the killer and not Jeremy, yet they still went out of their way to convict Jeremy of the murders even though they knew he couldn't have done it? Including if you believe them coaching Julie Mugford to give a convincing testimony? Surely if they knew what had happened wouldn't it have been easier to close the case as Sheila was obviously the murderer? Who deliberately goes out of their way to make their job as difficult as it could possibly be? Especially the police, whose job is already very difficult? And why? Just because the relatives applied a bit of pressure and got angry? Relatives will always do that and who can blame them? It appears Mike must have lost it. Even Roach thinks he's talking out of his a*se. I'm not sure if Mike really believes this stuff or if it is just an opportunity for him to make "hilarious" dog jokes (he is still standing by the "Sheila barked like a dog" story). Finally, if Sheila really did use the phone then it was a good job she did such a good job of cleaning herself up after her murderous killing spree and left not a trace of blood on the phone...

It's called post and run goatboy.  He learned that trick from Craigie and Hall.  He posts something controversial and then watches in glee as everyone fights over it like a pack of rabid bamberette's.   

[Tim Invictus]

Tesko is the one who has wasted his sad life on his Bamber infatuation. OCD takes many forms and truth and decency play no part in his pathetic little theories. He should be just laughed at especially when he gets so angry every other day!

Justice has been done in the Bamber case and nothing the cranks and glory hunter 'solicitor advocats' say or do will change that fact. No new Nelly The Helicopter or 'I Freed Bamber' books for that sorry bunch!

Sometimes the truth does win!

[Tim Invictus]

It looks like Mike Tesko has cracked the Bamber case (again) and is about to reveal some amazing new photographic evidence (yawn) and no doubt Bamber will be home (what home?) for Christmas!

No doubt Maddie McCann is about to be found too using Mike's 'Enigma' machine then it's on to finding Lord Lucan and Shergar. If he gets time he can obviously expose the real Jack The Ripper and let us know is the JFK assassination was a one man job or a conspiracy? What a man!

I feel sorry for NGB; Roch, Patti etc. having to work for such a bizarre fantasist like Tesko! Or rather I wonder how they keep a straight face!

 

[Tim Invictus]

The AMAZING new Tesko evidence .... some Venezis notes revealed in a 1991 interview with the COLP! The games up folks ... Bamber is clearly innocent and all those judges were wrong! I expect Bamber out by the weekend ... he can even come skiing with me as a sorry for calling him a sick, child murdering s..mbag! Sorry Jezza!   

Mike will be finding Keith Bennett's body tomorrow morning while he waits for his pop tarts to toast! Careful there Mike those things get damn hot ... don't burn ya lips off!

Great work Mike ... I am clearly convinced!!      

[Dog The Bounty Hunter]

The AMAZING new Tesko evidence .... some Venezis notes revealed in a 1991 interview with the COLP! The games up folks ... Bamber is clearly innocent and all those judges were wrong! I expect Bamber out by the weekend ... he can even come skiing with me as a sorry for calling him a sick, child murdering s..mbag! Sorry Jezza!   

Mike will be finding Keith Bennett's body tomorrow morning while he waits for his pop tarts to toast! Careful there Mike those things get damn hot ... don't burn ya lips off!

Great work Mike ... I am clearly convinced!!      

Gee whiz.........this man tesko sound like quite a geezer...a miracle worker! ??

What does he do for an encore guys??   

[John]

It looks like Mike Tesko has cracked the Bamber case (again) and is about to reveal some amazing new photographic evidence (yawn) and no doubt Bamber will be home (what home?) for Christmas!

No doubt Maddie McCann is about to be found too using Mike's 'Enigma' machine then it's on to finding Lord Lucan and Shergar. If he gets time he can obviously expose the real Jack The Ripper and let us know is the JFK assassination was a one man job or a conspiracy? What a man!

I feel sorry for NGB; Roch, Patti etc. having to work for such a bizarre fantasist like Tesko! Or rather I wonder how they keep a straight face!

 

Have you noticed that none of them ever have a conversation with him on the forum?  Quite bizarre really.

Noticed this post by Tesko a few minutes ago...

Let us also not forget, that when the pathologist cvartied out these examinations that sopecific police offiocers wdere present during the autopsy, so they would have been fully aware that the marks on Ralphs arm were made by the barrel of the gun minus a silencer, so that later when the relatives sought to intrioduce the silencer into the evidence, the police can't rely upon the excuse that they didn't know one way ior the other that a silencer had been used or not...


Looks like somebody is a bit worse for wear.       The bad English aside, who cares if the rifle had or hadn't a silencer fitted when Nevill was attacked, it makes not one iota of difference.  If this is the magic new evidence which McKay is attempting to persuade a panel of judges to consider I fear he is wasting his train fare to London and back.