Bamber tries to sell nude pictures of Sheila to The Sun newspaper

[Tim Invictus]

Great thread Andy. I remember the front page headlines when Bamber tried to sell those pics and the utter contempt and revulsion everyone had for him from then on.

Colin wrote in his book that Bamber showed him the photos with a sniggering nasty tone trying to embarrass him with explicit photos of his ex-wife and the mother of his children. Bamber kept the photos and Colin actually wrote to Bamber asking for all the photos because he was scared Jeremy might try to sell them to the tabloids. Within days The Sun story broke and Colin wasn't surprised in the slightest.

Bamber showed what an utter s..mbag he really is and I tell you something; if by some freak of chance Bamber is actually innocent and his case is a MoJ it could not have happened to a more deserving degenerate ...... not that there's a snowballs chance in hell that he isn't guilty of course!

Rot on Jeremy!     

[Andrea]

Whatever way you look at it Tim, his behaviour regarding the pictures was, as Fielder said, apalling. Then to suggest that Shiela and himself had been together, its disgusting.

[puglove]

Whatever way you look at it Tim, his behaviour regarding the pictures was, as Fielder said, apalling. Then to suggest that Shiela and himself had been together, its disgusting.

And this was at a time when any NORMAL person would be in deep shock, grieving for their family. He couldn't have cared less.

[puglove]

Whatever way you look at it Tim, his behaviour regarding the pictures was, as Fielder said, apalling. Then to suggest that Shiela and himself had been together, its disgusting.

And this was at a time when any NORMAL person would be in deep shock, grieving for their family. He couldn't have cared less.

Let's face it, he never was exactly grief stricken.

"Fancy a fry-up, lads?"

[Tim Invictus]

Whatever way you look at it Tim, his behaviour regarding the pictures was, as Fielder said, apalling. Then to suggest that Shiela and himself had been together, its disgusting.

And this was at a time when any NORMAL person would be in deep shock, grieving for their family. He couldn't have cared less.

Let's face it, he never was exactly grief stricken.

"Fancy a fry-up, lads?"

Well said Nick .... bacon and eggs within just a few hours of your whole family being murdered! Inconceivable. These examples show Bamber as a true sociopath ...

Profile of the Sociopath
Some of the common features of descriptions of the behavior of sociopaths.

Glibness and Superficial Charm

Manipulative and Conning
They never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behaviors as permissible. They appear to be charming, yet are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims.

Grandiose Sense of Self
Feels entitled to certain things as "their right."

Pathological Lying
Has no problem lying coolly and easily and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. Can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities. Extremely convincing and even able to pass lie detector tests.

Lack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt
A deep seated rage, which is split off and repressed, is at their core. Does not see others around them as people, but only as targets and opportunities. Instead of friends, they have victims and accomplices who end up as victims. The end always justifies the means and they let nothing stand in their way.

Shallow Emotions
When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive. Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises.

Incapacity for Love

Need for Stimulation
Living on the edge. Verbal outbursts and physical punishments are normal. Promiscuity and gambling are common.

Callousness/Lack of Empathy
Unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt for others' feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them.

Poor Behavioral Controls/Impulsive Nature
Rage and abuse, alternating with small expressions of love and approval produce an addictive cycle for abuser and abused, as well as creating hopelessness in the victim. Believe they are all-powerful, all-knowing, entitled to every wish, no sense of personal boundaries, no concern for their impact on others.

Early Behavior Problems/Juvenile Delinquency
Usually has a history of behavioral and academic difficulties, yet "gets by" by conning others. Problems in making and keeping friends; aberrant behaviors such as cruelty to people or animals, stealing, etc.

Irresponsibility/Unreliability
Not concerned about wrecking others' lives and dreams. Oblivious or indifferent to the devastation they cause. Does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed.

Promiscuous Sexual Behavior/Infidelity
Promiscuity, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual acting out of all sorts.

Lack of Realistic Life Plan/Parasitic Lifestyle
Tends to move around a lot or makes all encompassing promises for the future, poor work ethic but exploits others effectively.

Criminal or Entrepreneurial Versatility
Changes their image as needed to avoid prosecution. Changes life story readily.


That's Bamber!

[puglove]

Does Belton have any idea of the definition of libel?

Does anyone fancy contacting Kelvin McKenzie? I would imagine he would eat old Gladys for breakfast.

[puglove]

Does Belton have any idea of the definition of libel?

Does anyone fancy contacting Kelvin McKenzie? I would imagine he would eat old Gladys for breakfast.

Admin, with your contacts, would it be possible to speak to Kelvin McKenzie?

[puglove]

Does Belton have any idea of the definition of libel?

Does anyone fancy contacting Kelvin McKenzie? I would imagine he would eat old Gladys for breakfast.

Admin, with your contacts, would it be possible to speak to Kelvin McKenzie?

And possibly grab the comment - 6.33 on the Michael Fielder thread.

[goatboy]

Does Belton have any idea of the definition of libel?

Does anyone fancy contacting Kelvin McKenzie? I would imagine he would eat old Gladys for breakfast.

Unbelievable. Grahame dismisses any private conversations incriminating Bamber as hearsay. Then believes another private conversation which there is no evidence of ever happening to be gospel truth. Having had 27 years to come up with a host of crackpot theories they have now come up with another one (which strangely Tesko doesn't seem to be involved in at all) about a gangland killing.  I hope someone does inform Kelvin Mackenzie about this, I'm sure he knows a thing or two about libel laws.

[goatboy]

I wonder if the former editor of the Sun Kelvin Mackenzie will also deny partying with the actual chief police officers at a certain pub in 1986 celebrating the successful conviction of Jeremy Bamber. Where a contact of mine has sworn that Kelvin Mackenzie had a conversation with him where my contact said to KM "You know he didn't do it don't you?" KM, replied, "Of course we know the little shit didn't do it. It was the drugs gang he was associating with".
Now whether you do or do not believe what Kelvin Mackenzie said. The fact is he said it and he was partying with the coppers who were celebrating JB's conviction. Why would KM say those words? and why was he in close association with the police? Why was he saying something quite different to the official line. This contact of mine has sworn that this meeting took place.

This is what Grahame has to say. Then:

My contact swears that it is the truth. He was even scared to tell me. At the time he didn't even know who Jeremy Bamber was. I sent his signed statement to Simon McKay. What Simon McKay is going to do with it I don't know?

Have I missed something? Grahame's "contact" at first tells Kelvin that Bamber is obviously innocent then told Grahame he did not know who Jeremy was at the time!

[puglove]

Belton's talking bollocks as usual. A convenient "contact" who had never even heard of Bamber, yet was convinced that he was innocent?

Idiot. I hope McKenzie sues him.

[John]

I wonder if the former editor of the Sun Kelvin Mackenzie will also deny partying with the actual chief police officers at a certain pub in 1986 celebrating the successful conviction of Jeremy Bamber. Where a contact of mine has sworn that Kelvin Mackenzie had a conversation with him where my contact said to KM "You know he didn't do it don't you?" KM, replied, "Of course we know the little shit didn't do it. It was the drugs gang he was associating with".
Now whether you do or do not believe what Kelvin Mackenzie said. The fact is he said it and he was partying with the coppers who were celebrating JB's conviction. Why would KM say those words? and why was he in close association with the police? Why was he saying something quite different to the official line. This contact of mine has sworn that this meeting took place.

This is what Grahame has to say. Then:

My contact swears that it is the truth. He was even scared to tell me. At the time he didn't even know who Jeremy Bamber was. I sent his signed statement to Simon McKay. What Simon McKay is going to do with it I don't know?

Have I missed something? Grahame's "contact" at first tells Kelvin that Bamber is obviously innocent then told Grahame he did not know who Jeremy was at the time!

I haven't been following the blue forum lately, do you think Grahame is slightly confussed?   

[puglove]

It's a good job he's not Pinocchio, he wouldn't be able to get near his computer.

[Tim Invictus]

Is Gladys bigging himself up yet again ... I remember a while back he personally "solved the Bamber case. Prove positive." It sounds like his goats have broken into his allotment again and ravaged his precious peas .... Gladys on the warpath with his famed Hammer Of Wrath or as Ken Dodd calls it his tickling stick!

Even his goats don't take him seriously!

[puglove]

Never forget that Jeremy Bamber is a psychopathic liar who can look you in the eye and convince you that he is innocent, because he has convinced himself.