Scotland Yard given permission to question 8 key suspects.

[VIXTE]

It would all depend on how many masts there were at that time and whether the raw data is able to provide relevant information.

I checked it out, I found at least two masts. Now the question is where they are..

The thing that is quite curious is mention that 3 suspects SY wanted to question are identified from the phone data..

Then the PJ added 5 more to the list.

They obviously have reasons to suspect them.. and now what they are looking for is  more info in connection with these people..

[Alfred R Jones]

So is this your new strategy , to get report people for the very things you do to others ?

I asked you a question and you were unable to reply, so out came the quip in latin.

Seen that before.  >@@(*&)

You asked me a question that was completely unrelated to what I  wrote before.  Hence the use of the term non-sequitur.  I will answer questions related to my posts, not questions designed to deflect or de-rail.

[stephen25000]

You asked me a question that was completely unrelated to what I  wrote before.  Hence the use of the term non-sequitur.  I will answer questions related to my posts, not questions designed to deflect or de-rail.

What question or questions i may choose to ask , is solely up to me.

If you don't like it don't answer don't reply, but don't play the victim, it doesn't wash.

Your modus operandi is well known.

[Brietta]

Just doing their job ? Could you expand please Brietta ? Do you really have no thoughts on what SY may be looking for ?

Evidence which will help to explain what happened to Madeleine McCann in 2007.

[Truth]

i dont see how this can be true @ suspects in pdl - wouldnt they be gone by now into hiding? with all the warnings also they are digging FIRST interviewing second which is the wrong way round

[Brietta]

i dont see how this can be true @ suspects in pdl - wouldnt they be gone by now into hiding? with all the warnings also they are digging FIRST interviewing second which is the wrong way round

Possibly not the preferred order of doing things ~ but time is money ~ they’ve just got to react to events as they get permission to do so.  They’ve only just recieved permission to carry out interviews.

[faithlilly]

Evidence which will help to explain what happened to Madeleine McCann in 2007.

So if not a body, what ?

[Brietta]

So if not a body, what ?

You seem to be in anticipation of a body being found ???

[faithlilly]

You seem to be in anticipation of a body being found ???

No, I'm simply interested in what evidence you think SY are looking for ?

[John]

That means nothing. Maybe they were disturbed, held Madeleine. After having an accidental murder no burglar would remember or be keen to take any items.

Or imagine they were surprised with the children in there and Madeleine recognising them.

That is a very valid point.  There are few circumstances in which an intruder would even want to take a three-year-old child but if he thought for a moment that she had recognised him then that would be a trigger.  Another trigger would be if he thought she was about to yell or scream thus attracting attention, in those circumstances he might feel desperate enough to put his hand over her mouth resulting in asphyxiation.

[jassi]

Given that she seems to have spent the greater part of her holiday in the creche, how likely is it that she would recognise anyone, other than the nannies?

[John]

I have to agree with the earlier comment about putting the cart before the horse.  Carrying out digs before they have questioned any of the eight suspects is bizarre detective work indeed.

While still on the subject of digs, has anyone observed that they are not using mechanical diggers in terrain which is extremely challenging, I wonder has the magistrate who authorized the work limited the digs to hand tools?  Surely in such a large area the odd JCB would have come in handy?  Even Tony Robinson and Time Team use one and their excavations tend to be on a relatively small scale.

[Alfred R Jones]

Given that she seems to have spent the greater part of her holiday in the creche, how likely is it that she would recognise anyone, other than the nannies?

On a recent holiday our kids spent the greater part of their holiday with us (in fact - all of it), but were still able to recognise members of hotel staff who had engaged them in pleasantries, served them meals, drinks, done activities etc. 

[Alfred R Jones]

I have to agree with the earlier comment about putting the cart before the horse.  Carrying out digs before they have questioned any of the eight suspects is bizarre detective work indeed.

While still on the subject of digs, has anyone observed that they are not using mechanical diggers in terrain which is extremely challenging, I wonder has the magistrate who authorized the work limited the digs to hand tools?  Surely in such a large area the odd JCB would have come in handy?  Even Tony Robinson and Time Team use one and their excavations tend to be on a relatively small scale.

I'm glad you have pointed out how challenging the terrain is, particularly challenging I would imagine if you didn't have access to any sort of digging equipment, never mind mechanical diggers.

[jassi]

On a recent holiday our kids spent the greater part of their holiday with us (in fact - all of it), but were still able to recognise members of hotel staff who had engaged them in pleasantries, served them meals, drinks, done activities etc.

So are you suggesting that Abductorman was a member of staff?