Scotland Yard given permission to question 8 key suspects.

[stephen25000]

I have made my point.

Not really, you merely ignore what you would rather sweep under the carpet.

[Alfred R Jones]

Not really, you merely ignore what you would rather sweep under the carpet.

Once again you are attempting to derail the thread by making baseless accusations - what is wrong with you?  I answered Faithlilly's question full on, you then responded with your usual strawman, and here we are again, bickering over nothing.  Please, please, please grow up.

[stephen25000]

Once again you are attempting to derail the thread by making baseless accusations - what is wrong with you?  I answered Faithlilly's question full on, you then responded with your usual strawman, and here we are again, bickering over nothing.  Please, please, please grow up.

Bickering no.

Merely an observation.

Baseless accusations ???

[Alfred R Jones]

Bickering no.

Merely an observation.

Baseless accusations ???

What, specifically, have I ignored or swept under the carpet in my response to Faithlilly's question?  Bearing in mind the question was about the PJ, and not all the other police forces in the world....

[stephen25000]

What, specifically, have I ignored or swept under the carpet in my response to Faithlilly's question?  Bearing in mind the question was about the PJ, and not all the other police forces in the world....

You were implying only the Portuguese leak.

[Alfred R Jones]

You were implying only the Portuguese leak.

Perhaps you could highlight the post where I implied that ONLY the Portuguese leak?  I wait with baited breath....

[faithlilly]

The latter obviously.  All police leaking by the PJ is bad and indicative of a lack of discipline within the force.  Doesn't mean all the information they are leaking is false however.

If they are leaking at all.

[Alfred R Jones]

If they are leaking at all.

So when the Guardian quotes "Portuguese police sources", what could that possibly mean, in your view...?

[jassi]

It ought to mean an official source, but probably means a police cleaner or canteen worker.

[Alfred R Jones]

It ought to mean an official source, but probably means a police cleaner or canteen worker.

Yeah, probably. LOL.

[Alfred R Jones]

I'm sure whenever the Guardian or the Observer wants to know what's really going on at the heart of a police investigation they always seek out the cleaner or the canteen worker - they're always privy to the inner machinations of any investigation after all!

[VIXTE]

My theory has always been the same: Madeleine was took to order.
OC staff entered using the key, waited for the person who is to take Madeleine, when they arrived he-she opened the window, took Madeleine from her bed and passed her through the window to accomplice. Then the OC staff exited the apartment using the key again.
This was perfectly organised except for the delay in arrival of the accomplice.
Accomplice then carried Madeleine all the way the GNR dogs route to a parked car. GNR dogs caught this trail.

[slartibartfast]

My theory has always been the same: Madeleine was took to order.
OC staff entered using the key, waited for the person who is to take Madeleine, when they arrived he-she opened the window, took Madeleine from her bed and passed her through the window to accomplice. Then the OC staff exited the apartment using the key again.
This was perfectly organised except for the delay in arrival of the accomplice.
Accomplice then carried Madeleine all the way the GNR dogs route to a parked car. GNR dogs caught this trail.

Why?

[faithlilly]

So when the Guardian quotes "Portuguese police sources", what could that possibly mean, in your view...?

It means absolutely nothing unless the source is named.

[Alfred R Jones]

It means absolutely nothing unless the source is named.

Why so?  There clearly is a source leaking information from the PJ, unless it's your contention that the Guardian / Observer is making stuff up?