« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 26   Go Down

Author Topic: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.  (Read 78514 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #225 on: June 13, 2014, 06:46:52 PM »
Quote from: Alfred R Jones on June 13, 2014, 06:33:41 PM

What do you mean "The McCanns were not the suspects, right?"  What were they then?  Since when has the onus been on those being questioned by police to "prove their innocence"?  It is entirely up to the police to build a case against their suspects, and one way they can do this is by asking leading questions designed to incriminate those they are questioning.   

So simple, or not, depending on whether or not there is any evidence, which there wasn't.

The PJ were fishing, and it backfired. But since The McCanns had no idea of what had happened, then it was always going to back fire.

But trying to explain that no one has to prove their innocence, which is pretty nearly nigh on impossible, is a bit of a waste of time.  Apart from the fact that they never had to.

This is the rub.  Any otherwise then The McCanns would have been charged.  They weren't.

And you all can shriek Insufficient Evidence until the cows come home.  This was, and remains a fact.
Logged

Offline John

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #226 on: June 13, 2014, 06:49:00 PM »
Quote from: davel on June 13, 2014, 06:36:18 PM
rubbish...can you name one case anywhere in the world where suspects have been asked to prove their innocence...it is fascism in the extreme

Is refusal to cooperate an indicator of guilt or innocence?  A one word response will suffice.
Logged
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #227 on: June 13, 2014, 06:53:28 PM »
Quote from: John on June 13, 2014, 06:49:00 PM
Is refusal to cooperate an indicator of guilt or innocence?  A one word response will suffice.

it is an indicator of neither....ask colin stagg
Logged

Offline Eleanor

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #228 on: June 13, 2014, 06:55:42 PM »
Quote from: John on June 13, 2014, 06:49:00 PM
Is refusal to cooperate an indicator of guilt or innocence?  A one word response will suffice.

No.
Logged

Offline faithlilly

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #229 on: June 13, 2014, 06:56:03 PM »
Quote from: John on June 13, 2014, 06:49:00 PM
Is refusal to cooperate an indicator of guilt or innocence?  A one word response will suffice.

Probably !
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #230 on: June 13, 2014, 06:56:29 PM »
Quote from: John on June 13, 2014, 06:49:00 PM
Is refusal to cooperate an indicator of guilt or innocence?  A one word response will suffice.

Gerry answered all his questions.

Kate exercised her right of silence.

Both were acquitted.
Logged

Offline faithlilly

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #231 on: June 13, 2014, 07:02:01 PM »
Quote from: ferryman on June 13, 2014, 06:56:29 PM
Gerry answered all his questions.

Kate exercised her right of silence.

Both were acquitted.

Neither were acquitted. Their arguido status was dropped as a result of the case being archived.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #232 on: June 13, 2014, 07:04:49 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on June 13, 2014, 07:02:01 PM
Neither were acquitted. Their arguido status was dropped as a result of the case being archived.

cleared of all suspicion is probably semantically more accurate.
Logged

Offline faithlilly

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #233 on: June 13, 2014, 07:07:09 PM »
Quote from: ferryman on June 13, 2014, 07:04:49 PM
cleared of all suspicion is probably semantically more accurate.

I think no evidence was offered against them is probably nearer the mark.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #234 on: June 13, 2014, 07:10:46 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on June 13, 2014, 07:02:01 PM
Neither were acquitted. Their arguido status was dropped as a result of the case being archived.
So Murat has not been acquitted either then?
Logged

Offline faithlilly

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #235 on: June 13, 2014, 07:11:43 PM »
Quote from: Alfred R Jones on June 13, 2014, 07:10:46 PM
So Murat has not been acquitted either then?

No.

It is not within the AG's power to acquit.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #236 on: June 13, 2014, 07:30:10 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on June 13, 2014, 07:07:09 PM
I think no evidence was offered against them is probably nearer the mark.

No evidence to offer.
Logged

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #237 on: June 13, 2014, 07:32:41 PM »
Quote from: ferryman on June 13, 2014, 07:30:10 PM
No evidence to offer.

Remember.

Insufficient does not mean None.
Logged

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #238 on: June 13, 2014, 07:33:35 PM »
Quote from: stephen25000 on June 13, 2014, 07:32:41 PM
Remember.

Insufficient does not mean None.

There was no evidence against either McCann.
Logged

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #239 on: June 13, 2014, 07:36:26 PM »
Quote from: ferryman on June 13, 2014, 07:33:35 PM
There was no evidence against either McCann.

Insufficient evidence to charge anyone.

'TYPE OF CRIME UNKNOWN'.

Have you listened to the Nick Ferrari program today  dave  ?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 26   Go Up
« previous next »