Some people just do not like to lose an argument-but rather than be mature about it they start name calling. I will not be drawn to that level, therefore any abuse directed at me or about me will always be reported.
Back on topic:
The evidence would have been to show that Team Mc had a viable claim to make Mr Amaral withdraw or be forced to withdraw his book from the public as it harmed the search for their daughter, also they wanted Million of Euros as compensation for their alleged suffering, including little Maddie, (which I have mentioned before, NO ONE KNOWS if she did or has suffered from the contents of the book.
And I would further add, that Team MC have already stated on Many occasion,"there is no evidence that Maddie has come to any harm"
For those who missed by seeing red mist: Gerry McCann:"there is no evidence that Maddie has come to any harm"
Now, regardless of that; how do they know she suffered from the book contents and not the "being snatched form her bed by sex crazed paedophiles, raped tortured and left lying to die alone?
Hm anyone? they know, they said they know- well show us how you know-evidence.
This case at present is NOT about libe,l it is about money-compensation for harm caused.
With regards to the contents of the book. Mr Amaral was an investigative police officer, He suspected the mccanns were not telling the truth-I agree with him on that matter.
He wrote about the the investigation, and his THESIS- nothing wrong with that. Clever people do know what a Thesis is.
Note: parents kill their children- shocking I know, so lets not pretend that parents, no matter how they protest, can still be guilty.
I have never said what I believed happened to little Maddie. I do not make wild accusations.
I may not agree with Mr Amarals' book, But I defend his rights to write it.
You would think they would be more upset with the paedophiles than a book! BUT well...
