So what's next in the libel trial saga?

[stephen25000]

This Forum is going to be so much fun when Amaral loses.

Fun ???

Let's see the verdict.

No matter what the verdict is, it won't solve the case.

HJOWEVER, AS MORE PEOPLE ARE SEEING, THIS IS ALL ABOUT THE MCCANNS WANTING  MONEY.

[Mr Gray]

Fun ???

Let's see the verdict.

No matter what the verdict is, it won't solve the case.

HJOWEVER, AS MORE PEOPLE ARE SEEING, THIS IS ALL ABOUT THE MCCANNS WANTING  MONEY.

getting angry and frustrated with your capital letters...yes its going to be so much fun when the verdict is announced ..it will be fun to see amaral humiliated and fun to see what pathetic excuses posters come up with to explain the verdict...Im so looking forward to it

[Eleanor]

This case is about Madeleine and the obscene profit Amaral made from his scurrilous book.

[Mr Gray]

Why did Dr Amaral sack his brief? You would need to ask either of the parties involved or make a gross assumption.
As regards quantifying the evidence you have done nothing of the kind. You have merely repeated ad nauseam that in your opinion Dr Amaral is toast whatever that may mean. The rest is you repeating that you have looked at the evidence (even the stuff you reckon was handed over to the judge in her chambers?) and because you are so much smarter than the average bear poster you can see what the judge is yet to decide following the summing up on July 8th/10th 2014?
Well scroat me gently with a knotted advocate.

perhaps I'm  wrong in thinking you are smarter than the company you keep on here.....I can spot a loser a mile off...amaral is a loser and the evidence for that statement is there for all to see...sacking his lawyer and delaying the trial is certainly one piece

[Mr Gray]

So could Phil Spector or so he claimed but he was not smart enough to see what was coming round the corner at him.
Still no evidence detailed yet then as to why Dr Amaral has undoubtedly lost?
Just keep chanting the same thing.
He may have fired his lawyer because he was not pushing for him to "take the stand" and was to be reliant on "law" for his summing up rather than Sra Duarte who is going to present facts the judge already knows in her summing up.
Or he could have simply been playing an up and under to make the opposition sweat a bit.
Who knows; Oh dear I am silly Billy you know of course.

How about this for a paradox.
McCann supporters on this forum reckon the Portuguese judiciary is as bent as a dockers hook but in the same breath they are convinced Dr Amaral will lose the case. How does that reconcile then?

Ive posted my reasons for my belief that amaral has lost several times on this thread..you ask more questions now but as you have shown whatever the brilliance of the explanation you will simply plead dumb and pretend that no evidence has been given...its "PLAYING THE GAME"...

[Mr Gray]

You have not offered one shred of evidence. All you have done is give your speculative opinions as proof Amaral has lost.
Stop blethering and cite the evidence, and the "its all in the posts" will not wash because it isn't in the posts, or admit there is none and that it is all only in your humble opinion.

you haven't got a clue what the word evidence means...

[Mr Gray]

Standard Davel reply when cornered. Are you sure you do not wish to insert the words fool and silly as well?
If Dr Amaral has lost as you assert then you need to provide corroborative evidence that the judge believes that the information in Dr Amarals book is at significant variance with the detail that was in the PJ files which entered the public domain prior to the book being published and that somehow the contents of the book impeded the closed official search for the child. As the judge has yet to rule, and she makes it quite clear it is her job alone to compare the two, anything you say is merely your opinion based on an incomplete knowledge as according to you a lot of evidence has been given in private which you can have no knowledge of.
You have no points on the graph but already are asserting it is a graph of y = x².

As I have stated many times on this thread..my opinion is based on certain facts....any fact that supports an argument is deemed evidence...

amaral sacked his lawyer....amaral gave an interview in a Norwegian magazine which was very downbeat......amarals legal team have delayed the trial on several occasions...you may think it is weak evidence...that's your opinion..but it is evidence... so to say I have no evidence is wrong.....

[Eleanor]

Is there any truth in the rumour that people who contribute to a Defence Fund in a Libel Trial can later be called upon to pay towards The Damages if there is a short fall?

[jassi]

Is there any truth in the rumour that people who contribute to a Defence Fund in a Libel Trial can later be called upon to pay towards The Damages if there is a short fall?

I should think that's just a forum myth put about by those of your persuasion

[stephen25000]

I should think that's just a forum myth put about by those of your persuasion

Anything and everything to attack Amaral, even though his views were shared by others.

Now a question for the mccanns supporters, why NO MENTION OF THE OTHER DEFENDANTS IN THIS CASE ?

[Mr Gray]

Anything and everything to attack Amaral, even though his views were shared by others.

Now a question for the mccanns supporters, why NO MENTION OF THE OTHER DEFENDANTS IN THIS CASE ?

none of the  other defendants have said anything against the mccanns

[stephen25000]

none of the  other defendants have said anything against the mccanns

Really, but they are defendants.

So why are they defendants dave ?

[Miss Taken Identity]

The Team Mc were suing everyone involved in the publishing-distribution-discussing,making documentaries based on the contents of the book- which was based on the police investigation report.

IN PORTUGAL  Where the McCanns are merely visitors!

Yesssssssss It was one of them conspiracies things. They were all in on it. haha!

And who the hell are the Team Mcs to stomp into a country and demand people have freedoms of speech denied-basic human right that is! Article 8

Oh when Gerry ruled the world...

[Mr Gray]

The Team Mc were suing everyone involved in the publishing-distribution-discussing,making documentaries based on the contents of the book- which was based on the police investigation report.

IN PORTUGAL  Where the McCanns are merely visitors!

Yesssssssss It was one of them conspiracies things. They were all in on it. haha!

And who the hell are the Team Mcs to stomp into a country and demand people have freedoms of speech denied-basic human right that is! Article 8

Oh when Gerry ruled the world...

its the court who decides not the mccanns

[Miss Taken Identity]

This is not a criminal trial... This was initiated by Team Mcs. It woke the Portuguese up!

The court already decided to remove the ban... Win for Justice don't you think?