So what's next in the libel trial saga?

[Mr Gray]

So are you saying Amaral didn't win the appeal?

amaral succeeded in getting the injunction overturned.....the statement by the court is being misrepresented and believed by the usual dimwits

[Albertini]

amaral succeeded in getting the injunction overturned.....the statement by the court is being misrepresented and believed by the usual dimwits

Ok so please produce for us what you believe is the correct statement.

[Montclair]

amaral succeeded in getting the injunction overturned.....the statement by the court is being misrepresented and believed by the usual dimwits

The real problem is that you didn't like the decision to overturn the injunction and now the acordão is being misrepresented? You are really worried about those dogs, no matter what you say.

[Mr Gray]

Ok so please produce for us what you believe is the correct statement.

I have produced what is purported to be the correct statement and it states that eddie alerted to cadaver on the key fob...I don't believe that..do you? That's why I believe it to be incorrect...perhaps you could address that point rather than trying to avoid it

[Albertini]

And furthermore can you tell us why, if this was not the real statements of the judges why the McCann's have never sought to correct the statement it produce their own version?

Or why their Portuguese legal team have not sought to take action against the publishers of the statement you claim is misrepresentative of the actual judges summations?

[Mr Gray]

The real problem is that you didn't like the decision to overturn the injunction and now the acordão is being misrepresented? You are really worried about those dogs, no matter what you say.

why should I be in the slightest worried about the dogs when Grime does not confirm the findings...SY say Maddie may still be alive...one of amarals lawyers agreed Maddie may still be alive...unlike you I understand the dogs' alerts.......they signify nothing..

[Albertini]

I have produced what is purported to be the correct statement and it states that eddie alerted to cadaver on the key fob...I don't believe that..do you? That's why I believe it to be incorrect...perhaps you could address that point rather than trying to avoid it

So you can't produce it?

[Mr Gray]

And furthermore can you tell us why, if this was not the real statements of the judges why the McCann's have never sought to correct the statement it produce their own version?

Or why their Portuguese legal team have not sought to take action against the publishers of the statement you claim is misrepresentative of the actual judges summations?

because they are not of the slightest importance...as I have said...posters have included the defendants deposition with the judgement....I can see it but I'm not surprised others can't. Do you really think the judges included an incorrect assessment of the dogs in their official judgement

[Mr Gray]

So you can't produce it?

It seems no one can.... ..but I can recognise a misrepresentation when I see it...just takes a bit of intelligence

[pathfinder73]

why should I be in the slightest worried about the dogs when Grime does not confirm the findings...SY say Maddie may still be alive...one of amarals lawyers agreed Maddie may still be alive...unlike you I understand the dogs' alerts.......they signify nothing..

Eddie's alert wasn't confirmed in the murder of Kate Prout but it changed the investigation and her husband became prime suspect.

[Albertini]

because they are not of the slightest importance...as I have said...posters have included the defendants deposition with the judgement....I can see it but I'm not surprised others can't. Do you really think the judges included an incorrect assessment of the dogs in their official judgement

I believe the statment is correct. If it wasn't it would have been rapidly corrected by the McCann's and their team of paid and unpaid Internet monitors.

Not of the slightest importance? You believe a panel of judges  stating that Amaral's interpretation of the facts of the case presented in his book was equally valid to the conclusions of the prosecutor is of no importance?

I see you still possess the same levels of delusionalism as when I used to post on here more regularly.

It's why I rarely post here anymore when you have ferryman claiming that the trial has already determined libel and you arguing that the appeals court ruling isn't the actual ruling and then can't produce what you believe is the correct one.

What is the point of attempting to debate with such small mindedness and intransigence.

[faithlilly]

Eddie's alert wasn't confirmed in the murder of Kate Prout but it changed the investigation and her husband became prime suspect.

And he was of course guilty.

I believe Prout had a group of supporters too who adjudged the evidence against him to be trumped up..........right up to he confessed.

[Mr Gray]

And he was of course guilty.

I believe Prout had a group of supporters too who adjudged the evidence against him to be trumped up..........right up to he confessed.

when the mccanns confess you will have a valid point...at the moment you don't

[Albertini]

Then why are you engaging at all if we're all so beneath you?

To attempt to determine on what basis and evidence both ferrymans and David's posts were based.

When there's none produced it highlights my position you've just quoted from my previous posts.

[John]

Posters are reminded of the forum rules.  No personal insults or abuse if you please. TY