So what's next in the libel trial saga?

[Anna]

Didn't Amaral admit he hadn't read the Final Report either?  The one his book is supposedly based on?

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=4530.msg205760#msg205760

[Eleanor]

That old cookie won't wear Eleanor.  Had Duarte made any significant advances it would have been reflected not only in the court reports but also in the press.  Have you seen any such reports?

Only in your opinion, Sweetling.  We don't actually know half of what is going on.

[Alfred R Jones]

Let's not forget Susan Hubbards abject humiliation and headlong fall into a giant bear trap:

Defence Lawyer: How did the couple react when they were made arguidos?

Susan Hubbard: The McCanns didn't fear the arguido status because they knew they were innocent.

Defence Lawyer:  Then we could  expect the same reaction after the book was published

Oops!! She fell for that one!

Can we have her reply please?  I don't see why you think this was a trap - there is a huge difference between not fearing being made arguidos when you know you are innocent and are confident that the legal process will arrive at the same conclusion and the feelings of anger, despair, frustration you would feel about a book read by thousands that claimed to tell the truth about you but which in reality was a pack of lies, exploiting your miising child and written for a profit.

[ferryman]

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=4530.msg205760#msg205760

Amaral had to admit that, because he was booted off before it was written.

[Mr Gray]

They have to provide proof to substantiate their claim of libel.

no they don't...they have been accused of a criminal act.......that's libel per se

[ferryman]

no they don't...they have been accused of a criminal act.......that's libel per se

Whether they have to prove it or not, they can.

That's all that matters ...

[Albertini]

Anne Guides' report ...

Oh. That's right, if in trouble it's them tranzlators wot dunnit.

The de facto fall back for any flapping mccann supporter.

[ferryman]

Oh. That's right, if in trouble it's them tranzlators wot dunnit.

The de facto fall back for any flapping mccann supporter.

Anne botched up royally on Alan Pike's testimony.

[Albertini]

Can we have her reply please?  I don't see why you think this was a trap - there is a huge difference between not fearing being made arguidos when you know you are innocent and are confident that the legal process will arrive at the same conclusion and the feelings of anger, despair, frustration you would feel about a book read by thousands that claimed to tell the truth about you but which in reality was a pack of lies, exploiting your miising child and written for a profit.

 Google it.

Huge difference you say? If they were so unfearful of the Arguido status why did Kate state in her book:

"Gerry was seriously considering sneaking us into a car and driving us all across the border to Spain. It would have been crazy."

[Mr Gray]

Oh. That's right, if in trouble it's them tranzlators wot dunnit.

The de facto fall back for any flapping mccann supporter.

If a tenth of what you believe was true amaral would be cock a hoop...yet you can see he is a broken man... I am wondering how you are going to explain how you got everything so wrong once the verdict comes out...it will be something to look forward to

[Albertini]

no they don't...they have been accused of a criminal act.......that's libel per se

Case closed then Dave!

Pity those darn appeal judges made it clear the book did not impinge the McCann's rights and drove a coach and horses through your argument.

If you were right the judges would have upheld the book ban wouldn't they?

[ferryman]

Case closed then Dave!

Pity those darn appeal judges made it clear the book did not impinge the McCann's rights and drove a coach and horses through your argument.

If you were right the judges would have upheld the book ban wouldn't they?

Either they didn't read the book or they didn't read the files.

[Albertini]

If a tenth of what you believe was true amaral would be cock a hoop...yet you can see he is a broken man... I am wondering how you are going to explain how you got everything so wrong once the verdict comes out...it will be something to look forward to

I have stated what I believe and why I believe it.

I've quoted the appeals court ruling. I've quoted the testimonies of the McCann's witnesses.

I've yet to hear of any sensible rebuttal.

Whys that I wonder?

[Alfred R Jones]

Google it.

Huge difference you say? If they were so unfearful of the Arguido status why did Kate state in her book:

"Gerry was seriously considering sneaking us into a car and driving us all across the border to Spain. It would have been crazy."

They didn't though did they? 

[Albertini]

Either they didn't read the book or they didn't read the files.

You're going down the same road as funnyman?

Please don't my sides have only just stopped hurting from his pronouncements about him being right and the judges being wrong.