I have always said that Mark Warner Company got off the hook too easily on the occasion of Madeleine's perceived abduction. Had I been a guest and later found out that the management knew about these intruders and did nada about it, I would have been furious.
I agree John. Although hindsight is an exact science I think Mark Warner got off very lightly in this whole affair.
However I don't think MW could have carried out proper risk assessments or if they did they didn't implement them as far as security of the apartments was concerned.
Margaret Hall's statement makes it clear that management had been made aware of the man she saw lurking in the darkness outside Apartment 5A five months before the event while she was baby sitting.
I noticed from her statement that the patio doors were referred to as the front door.
-quote -"She said that the front door was the main door to enter the apartment, situated at the back." -end quote
She also mentioned motion sensitive lights being activated when she went outside at 00.30.
-quote - "She left by the front door and in the darkness, by the movement sensitive lights, she saw something move and thought its was a rat." - end quote
I have read the statement before but that didn't register with me ... were the Drs McCann relying on seeing these lights going on from the Tapas as an additional safeguard to the checks?
Also she was able to give a good description ... I can recall one efit which I think would match that ... does anyone know if she was asked to help compose an efit?
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARGARET_HALL.htm