I'll just pick you up on this one,...what evidence do you have that smith was pressurised to tone down his ID...you need to provide a cite...you won't be able to...are you now simply making things up
So you think he simply changed his mind about his observation? The facts are that Mr Smith was so adamant that the man he encountered that night back in Praia da Luz was Gerry McCann that he contacted his local Guarda station who took a statement from him. They in turn contacted the Portuguese police who arranged for Mr Smith, Peter and Aoife to travel back to Portugal to make formal statements.
Next thing we know is that Brian Kennedy acting on behalf of the McCanns made contact with Mr Smith back in Drogheda in the Irish Republc and attempted to get him to do e-fits, he refused. This is where it gets interesting. What we had in effect was an agent acting on behalf of the McCanns approaching an eye witness who had identified Gerry McCann as a suspect. Now if that isn't interference with a live criminal investigation then I don't know what is?
Even later, another attempt is made by agents acting on behalf of the McCanns to get Mr Smith to cooperate in producing e-fits of the man he encountered. This agent was conman Kevin Halligen who was then providing his PI services under the banner of Red Defence International, later to become Oakley International, a Company which he set up specifically to service the Find Madeleine contract.
Halligen later admitted that he did manage to obtain e-fits from the Smith family, one of which was a remarkable likeness to Gerry McCann. These e-fits were not immediately made available to any police agency and were not released to the public for several years. In an interview with the London Times, Halligen claimed that Oakley had provided a report of their investigations which was highly critical of the McCanns but was prevented from releasing it due to a confidentiality clause within his contract.
And Mr Smith has never been heard of ever again. Says it all really??