So what?
He has a right to work for anyone. Who are you to decide who he should, or should not, work for?
He was a very young Lawyer when he took these mighty cases on ... and was probably chosen by the Lawyers Association because he was good, compassionate and .... wasn't aware of the strange death (?by accident?) of a Lawyer, and the serious injuries to another Lawyer, both of whom had the temerity to take on the PJ after the Michael Cook injustices.
Michael Cook injustices as outlined in the British Parliament
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199293/cmhansrd/1992-06-09/Debate-20.html
... many people questioned why this Lawyers car met with an ?accident? in the mountains
To remind you, Marcos Aragao Correia won all three times he took Amaral on. Is that why you have it in for him so much ?
I have merely pointed out that he is duplicitous.
He was clearly engaged by Metodo3 to go after Amaral.
I would question the honesty of any person who denies it, as I have supplied quotes from Correia himself, confirming that.
You were quite happy he was engaged to go after Amaral Sadie, so attacking me questioning him, is really rank hypocrisy.
he was also trying to make a deal with other police officers, to get them to give evidence that Amaral organized 'torture'.
Can you explain to me, as that was a complete lie, among others, why he hasn't been prosecuted for trying to subvert the law ?
meanwhile he has disappeared back into the obscurity he came from