Author Topic: Método 3, Marcos Aragão Correia and the campaign to discredit Gonçalo Amaral.  (Read 148844 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

http://frommybigdesk.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/leonor-cipriano-sentenced-for-lying.html

For interest only. It is not a response to anything in particular.
Summed up well "So, let's see where we have arrived at: Leonor Cipriano, her lawyer who has scarpered to Brazil, a bunch of dodgy detectives and a libel trial based on a book which has already been judged by both the Appeals Court and Portugal's Supreme Court not to have breached the McCanns' basic rights.

Good luck Dr Amaral! This truly is a tangled web! "

Portugal's Supreme Court not to have breached the McCanns' basic rights. has this decision been released?

Do you mean you want a copy of a contract for an illegal activity? 
You don't see too many of those about these days do you?   @)(++(*
Proof is what we need.  A cite as we say.

Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline John

I know we have looked at this issue previously and probably on several occasions.  There can be no doubt that Metodo 3 employed Correia but the big question is what was he employed to do?

A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Summed up well "So, let's see where we have arrived at: Leonor Cipriano, her lawyer who has scarpered to Brazil, a bunch of dodgy detectives and a libel trial based on a book which has already been judged by both the Appeals Court and Portugal's Supreme Court not to have breached the McCanns' basic rights.

Good luck Dr Amaral! This truly is a tangled web! "

Portugal's Supreme Court not to have breached the McCanns' basic rights. has this decision been released?
Proof is what we need.  A cite as we say.

Yeah! I "heard" you the first time.
Now you can try to work out why I said what I did  then contemplate why one will only obtain the truth from the two who did the deal.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline sadie

I know we have looked at this issue previously and probably on several occasions.  There can be no doubt that Metodo 3 employed Correia but the big question is what was he employed to do?
I think Marcos Correia worked pro bono (at least on the joana / Leonor C. Case) with just expences paid, John.

Offline slartibartfast

I think Marcos Correia worked pro bono (at least on the joana / Leonor C. Case) with just expences paid, John.

Please see previous post from Brietta.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

stephen25000

  • Guest
A quote from Robin Cook — 'If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's a duck!'

No matter how Mccann supporters would like to think otherwise, there is no doubt in any person who has studied the case dispassionately,  that Correia was employed for a specific reason.

CITE...

'Método 3, the Spanish detective agency hired by the McCanns, tried to convince Leonor Cipriano's Lawyer to change the course of defense. The agency operational wanted to make of Gonçalo Amaral - the former coordinator of the PJ of Portimão, responsible for the investigation to the disappearance of Madeleine and Joana, the main target, through the intersection of the two cases

by Pedro Coelho/SIC

The contact was made during the period in which the Spanish detectives were investigating the case of Madeleine McCann, 3 years old, disappeared from Praia da Luz, Algarve, on 3rd May 2007. The agency's operationals contacted the lawyer from Algarve, João Grade dos Santos [Leonor Cipriano former Lawyer], requesting support in the investigations. "They told me that they had contacted me because I was working on a matter which according to them, had similarities", clarifies the lawyer.

João Grade dos Santos prompted the interest of Método3 because he was officially defending Leonor Cipriano in a process where Gonçalo Amaral, was accused, by the Public Ministry, of omission to report acts of torture, performed by three other inspectors of the PJ, during the questioning to the mother of Joana Cipriano. The process, still ongoing, involves 5 members of the Judiciary Police and was opened following a complaint put forward by the director of the Odemira prison [Ana Maria Calado].

In February 2005, the Expresso newspaper published [article written by the actual Lawyer's bar Marinho Pinto] a series of photos of Leonor Cipriano, where the prison inmate appears with her eyes and face bruised. The bruises denounced the existence of an aggression.

Joana's mother, the eight year old girl, who disappeared in 2004 from the village of Figueira in the Algarve, was sentenced to 16 years in prison for the death and concealment of the corpse of her daughter.

In the contact made with João Grade dos Santos, the detectives of Método 3 spoke specifically of Gonçalo Amaral: "Obviously they had to speak about him: he was the inspector most talked about at that moment - mocked the lawyer - after all he was at the investigation of the two cases", he concludes. In their approach, the detectives emphasised the advantages of the proposal, "They told me that money for expenses was not a problem", stressed the lawyer.

Leonor Cipriano was defended by João Grade of Santos during all the inquest period but, on the eve of the start of the trial, the client waived the lawyer's services.

Months after having refused the proposal for collaboration with Metodo 3, João Grade dos Santos was replaced by Marcos Aragão Correia, a young lawyer with offices in Madeira [Portuguese Island]. From him it was a known a quick, but symbolic, passage through the continent: Aragão Correia participated in the searches for Madeleine, as a medium [psychic]. The lawyer had visions of the girl's corpse in the dam of the river Arade, in Silves. "The Judiciary Police - recognizes Aragão - completely dismissed these evidences, though I was a lawyer, while the Método 3 was very interested", he adds.

But the interest of the agency would focus in another objective: the detectives needed a lawyer who would assume the intersection of the Joana and Maddie cases.

Aragão Correia accepted what Grade dos Santos had refused: "The detectives met with me and told me: 'We are very concerned because there is an element common to both cases: Gonçalo Amaral, who is not interested in looking for children, he is only interested on incriminating the parents. It happened in Maddie’s case and also in Joana’s case.' Método 3 asked me to get involved in the case, they didn’t ask me to be Leonor’s lawyer, they asked me to make a few investigations as a lawyer."


Marcos Aragão Correia has accepted the challenge and, when he consulted the Joana case, he identified himself immediately, with the Spanish detectives theory. "I was outraged - he recalls - I thought that Mr. Gonçalo Amaral had a hidden interest for systematically accusing the mothers without evidences against them."

Following the interest expressed with the case, Marcos Aragão Correia visited Leonor Cipriano at the Odemira prison from where he ended up close to becoming the substitute of João Grade dos Santos: "It was Leonor who asked me. She told me that no one had ever defended her like that. After much reflection I decided to accept, and I informed Dr.João Grade dos Santos of Leonor’s decision".

As soon as Marcos Aragão Correia assumed the defense of Leonor Cipriano, the proceedings, relative to the Faro’s trial against the five PJ inspectors, changed it's course. He assumes that change himself: "The biggest nightmare of Gonçalo Amaral was when I entered in the case", he alerts.

Paulo Pereira Cristovão, a former PJ inspector and one of the 5 arguidos of Faro accuses Marcos Aragão Correia of trying to make a 'deal' with the defendants."And that deal was: all of you incriminate Gonçalo Amaral and I’ll arrange so that Leonor Cipriano says that you have nothing to do with this – well, deals like this, only in Hollywood", ironizes Pereira Cristovão.

Marcos Aragão Correia does not deny the existence of such a deal, he even alleges that the deal was related with a "confidence made by one of the arguidos" that had reached his ears. "That defendant send an e-mail to a friend of mine where he pointed Gonçalo Amaral as being guilty", denounces the lawyer.

Marcos Aragão Correia confesses that the negative opinion about the way that Gonçalo Amaral investigated the cases of Maddie and Joana, is not shared alone with the Método 3, hired by the McCann couple. The lawyer feeds the enigma: "If I am taking sides for one of the parties, it is obvious that that side is giving me moral support".

Aragão Correia does not clarify who is in fact behind this puzzle: "The secrecy of the contract which bounds me to Método 3 stops me from revealing details regarding the private investigation", concludes.

Contacted by the SIC, Método 3 decided not to give any statements. Nevertheless the McCann family spokesman alleges that the family does not comment issues that they consider to be negative.


http://sicnoticias.sapo.pt/programas/re ... alo-amaral

http://themaddiecasefiles.com/topic24430.html  '

Plus of course................

‘Spanish detectives asked me to arrange for evidence against Gonçalo Amaral’


http://truthcannotbesilenced.blogspot.co.uk/2008/12/spanish-detectives-asked-me-to-arrange.html


There is also the matter of the gloating which Correia did after 'winning' a case against Amaral. I will find that in due course, as it said everything about him and his motives.
« Last Edit: December 24, 2016, 10:26:16 AM by stephen25000 »

stephen25000

  • Guest
' AC – As I enter in the case of Madeleine McCann - always believed in the innocence of parents, found a brutality what they did to them in terms of court. The research, parents who felt abandoned by the Portuguese police...They hired an agency of the Spanish detectives, Method 3, which was primarily responsible for the private investigation in this case. It was the espanhla agency that invited me to work with them. I gave into account, alarmed, the amount of evidence they had gathered in relation to facts which inculpavam Gonçalo Amaral. Comes the case of Joana Cipriano. When it happened, I was not a lawyer so I could not participate. When it happened the case of Madeleine McCann on May 3, 2007, I was already effective lawyer, because I always fell in love with me children's rights, protection of rights and freedoms of individuals, there was an opportunity here for me to do something I liked. As I mentioned in the previous question, the criminal law has always been my great passion is what I like to do within the law and so, when I enter the Madeleine McCann case, it does so because he believed in the innocence of the parents. It did not have to do with money, because he had a good family base that allowed me to live well financially but wanted to be part of that story. I worked "pro bono" that is, without expecting anything in return and without accepting anything in return. I started collaborating with detectives parents of Madeleine McCann and Leonor Cipriano.........................'


http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t12422-whatever-happened-to-marcos-aragao-correia-the-weird-medium-madeira-lawyer-who-once-claimed-his-mediumistic-powers-were-fully-verified-by-francisco-marco-colleagues-at-metodo-3-who-also-successfully-prosecuted-goncalo-amaral-for-alleged-perjury

As to being pro-bono, he was employed by Metodo3, thereby a paid employer.
« Last Edit: December 24, 2016, 09:00:52 AM by stephen25000 »

stephen25000

  • Guest
The sheer blindess of some people never ceases to amaze, unless of course they know the truth full well, and are on here to attack it at every opportunity.

It's called 'spot the duck'. 8)--))

Offline Mr Gray

The sheer blindess of some people never ceases to amaze, unless of course they know the truth full well, and are on here to attack it at every opportunity.

It's called 'spot the duck'. 8)--))

So still nothing to support your accusation
As expected

Offline G-Unit

How strange you have quoted a post of mine from two and a half years ago
Very strange behaviour

If I knowingly quote others I provide a cite. What I posted is what came into my mind when I read your post expressing your satisfaction at annoying Carly.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

If I knowingly quote others I provide a cite. What I posted is what came into my mind when I read your post expressing your satisfaction at annoying Carly.

May well be but totally bizarre behaviour

Offline Mr Gray

It's like i said Slarti, the evidence is there, yet some refuse to accept it.

Blind devotion, or are they acting on behalf of a certain party ?

Now, that's the question.

The evidence is not there and you pretending it is only shows how misguided you are

stephen25000

  • Guest
Tis a true shame, that some people never learn, even when the quotes come from Correia himself.


NOW that is truly foolish, since any guest can check out the links given, and others all too easily.


Now if Correia, has a problem, he knows where to come and argue his case. 8)--))

stephen25000

  • Guest
Some posters seem to be incapable of reading or understanding other posts on the same thread. @)(++(* @)(++(*

Offline Mr Gray

Some posters seem to be incapable of reading or understanding other posts on the same thread. @)(++(* @)(++(*

Yes you don't understand that you have still not provided anything to support your claim
You don't seem to understand your own posts let alone anyone elses