Author Topic: Método 3, Marcos Aragão Correia and the campaign to discredit Gonçalo Amaral.  (Read 156946 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

Well, if you don't know, then don't comment.
I was only pointing out that you were wrong when you said: "It is fascinating to observe the continued denials".
I suppose you will deny that too!
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

stephen25000

  • Guest
I was only pointing out that you were wrong when you said: "It is fascinating to observe the continued denials".
I suppose you will deny that too!

Why are trying to have a pointless argument.

I was referring to myself.

Now, if you wish to discuss the thread, please do so.

Offline Robittybob1

Why are trying to have a pointless argument.

I was referring to myself.

Now, if you wish to discuss the thread, please do so.
So you meant "I find it fascinating to observe the continued denials".  I think the proposition is prone to denial.
"The mccanns employed Metodo 3. They 'employed'  Correia to attack Amaral."
« Last Edit: January 10, 2017, 09:24:57 AM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline jassi

I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Robittybob1

Oh yes it is    @)(++(*
I've learned that you are always spot on.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline jassi

It's nice to be appreciated  8(0(*
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline John

So you meant "I find it fascinating to observe the continued denials".  I think the proposition is prone to denial.
"The mccanns employed Metodo 3. They 'employed'  Correia to attack Amaral."

The real question is who was ultimately pulling the strings and giving the orders or are we to infer that Método 3 took it upon themselves to do what they did?   In fact, what the hell has Leonor Cipriano to do with finding a missing Madeleine, after all, wasn't that why M3 were employed in the first place?  Or did their brief suddenly change?

My own long held view is that this is a police matter and should be properly investigated.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2017, 11:24:39 AM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Maddie and Joana: Crossroads

SIC in-depth report is signed by the journalists Pedro Coelho and Rita Jordao, camera by Luís Pinto and edition by Ricardo Tenreiro.

Metodo 3, the Spanish detective agency hired by the McCanns, tried to seduce Leonor Cipriano's lawyer to change course of defence. The agency's operatives wanted to make Gonçalo Amaral - the former PJ coordinator of Portimão and responsible for the investigation of the disappearance of Madeleine and Joana, daughter of Leonor Cipriano - the main target, through the intersection of both cases.

'The Spanish Agency, Metodo 3 hired by the McCanns to allegedly find their mysteriously disappeared daughter, recruited the psychic lawyer Marcos Aragao Correia to incriminate Goncalo Amaral. SIC had access to documents which apparently prove that the Spanish agency has tried to undermine the credibility of the Portuguese investigation on the Madeleine McCann Case.'
 
http://sicnoticias.sapo.pt/programas/reportagemsic/2009-02-13-maddie-e-joana-caminhos-cruzados1

It's not reasonable cite
It's says the McCanns hired M3 to allegedly find their mysteriously disappeared daughter

That is a totally biased report and gives the article no credibility
M

Offline John

It's not reasonable cite
It's says the McCanns hired M3 to allegedly find their mysteriously disappeared daughter

That is a totally biased report and gives the article no credibility
M

You have to watch the documentary to understand the evidence.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

You have to watch the documentary to understand the evidence.

That article is extremely anti McCann
There is no denying it
It is not balanced or fair towards the McCanns so it's safe to assume the rest is unbalanced and unfair

Offline John

That article is extremely anti McCann
There is no denying it
It is not balanced or fair towards the McCanns so it's safe to assume the rest is unbalanced and unfair

The article and the documentary which accompanied it were based on hard evidence so if it was critical of the McCanns and their agents then that can only be interpreted in one way.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

The article and the documentary which accompanied it were based on hard evidence so if it was critical of the McCanns and their agents then that can only be interpreted in one way.

Yes John
The programme makers are biased
To say the McCanns hired M3 allegedly to look for their daughter is a bit of a giveaway
Journalist should be impartial
These obviously aren't

Offline John

Yes John
The programme makers are biased
To say the McCanns hired M3 allegedly to look for their daughter is a bit of a giveaway
Journalist should be impartial
These obviously aren't

In fact wasn't it Kennedy who employed them?
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

In fact wasn't it Kennedy who employed them?
Yes but they were hired to look for Maddie
Nothing allegedly about it