Método 3, Marcos Aragão Correia and the campaign to discredit Gonçalo Amaral.

[misty]

Several cited and direct quotations have been provided from Marcos Correia, stating precisely what he was doing and his relationship to Metodo3, and the involvement with the Mccann and Cipriano case.

Other than insanity, of course, there is another possibility, as to why someone would deny the truth.

That would be of course acting directly on behalf of the McCann's.

Remembering of course, what Mrs. Mccann admitted at Leveson.

Cue once again the inevitable reply.

Do you think Amaral was convicted for falsifying documents in the Cipriano case because of, or in spite of, th involvement of Correia in the prosecution case?

[stephen25000]

Do you think Amaral was convicted for falsifying documents in the Cipriano case because of, or in spite of, th involvement of Correia in the prosecution case?

Did I say he wasn't ?

Are you denying that Correia was going after Amaral with instructions from Metodo3, who employed him, and of course Correia's involvement with the Mccann and Cipriano cases ?

[slartibartfast]

Do you think Amaral was convicted for falsifying documents in the Cipriano case because of, or in spite of, th involvement of Correia in the prosecution case?

It was the only charge they had any proof of?

[misty]

Did I say he wasn't ?

Are you denying that Correia was going after Amaral with instructions from Metodo3, who employed him, and of course Correia's involvement with the Mccann and Cipriano cases ?

Do you have proof that Correia was "going after Amaral" rather than gaining some inside knowledge of the methodology used by him in convicting Leonor? Of course you don't. Amaral was facing prosecution for his own actions in the torture of Leonor. Amaral discredited himself.

[misty]

It was the only charge they had any proof of?

So, in spite of Correio, then.

[stephen25000]

Do you have proof that Correia was "going after Amaral" rather than gaining some inside knowledge of the methodology used by him in convicting Leonor? Of course you don't. Amaral was facing prosecution for his own actions in the torture of Leonor. Amaral discredited himself.

He admitted it himself.

What of the lies and attempts by Correia to subvert justice, by Correia accusing Amaral directly of torture ?

[sadie]

Have you even bothered reading the thread title ?

Stephen, no need to discredit Amaral.#

He has already discredited himself, many times over.

[ShiningInLuz]

So what?

He has a right to work for anyone.  Who are you to decide who he should, or should not, work for?

He was a very young Lawyer when he took these mighty cases on ... and was probably chosen by the Lawyers Association because he was good, compassionate and .... wasn't aware of the strange death (?by accident?) of a Lawyer, and the serious injuries to another Lawyer, both of whom had the temerity to take on the PJ after the Michael Cook injustices.
 
Michael Cook injustices as outlined in the British Parliament
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199293/cmhansrd/1992-06-09/Debate-20.html

... many people questioned why this Lawyers car met with an ?accident? in the mountains


To remind you, Marcos Aragao Correia won all three times he took Amaral on.  Is that why you have it in for him so much ?

Your link shows the difference between claims alleged by Michael Cook and what the FCO actually found on numerous occasions when they visited him.

 

[stephen25000]

Stephen, no need to discredit Amaral.#

He has already discredited himself, many times over.

You still don't get it, do you.

[Mr Gray]

Could we get this straight

On topic no evidence had been given support the claim of  a campaign to discredit amaral
It is mere supposition

[misty]

Amaral was indicted on the day Madeleine went missing & long before Correia was ever on the scene. Clearly the Portuguese AG had enough evidence to proceed with a case well before any supposed attempts were made to discredit him further.

[John]

It is a very true saying that there is no smoke without fire.  The events which have been documented in some detail in this thread if taken at their highest potentially amount to a conspiracy to defeat the ends of justice.  The allegations are serious enough to warrant some sort of independent inquiry involving Portugal, Spain and the UK.  It could be that such an Inquiry could follow on from the Portuguese Supreme Court ruling due any day now. These issues must be investigated thoroughly and if it is found that any person or persons did intentionally set out to pervert the course of justice then they must face the full consequences of their actions and are dealt with appropriately..

Marcos Correia is central to this investigation, he alone connects Amaral with Método 3, Kennedy and the McCanns.  It must be established who was deciding strategy, giving the orders, who was paying who and what was the real agenda?

[Eleanor]

It is a very true saying that there is no smoke without fire.  The events which have been documented in some detail in this thread if taken at their highest potentially amount to a conspiracy to defeat the ends of justice.  The allegations are serious enough to warrant some sort of independent inquiry involving Portugal, Spain and the UK.  It could be that such an Inquiry could follow on from the Portuguese Supreme Court ruling due any day now. These issues must be investigated thoroughly and if it is found that any person or persons did intentionally set out to pervert the course of justice then they must face the full consequences of their actions and are dealt with appropriately..

Marcos Correia is central to this investigation, he alone connects Amaral with Método 3, Kennedy and the McCanns.  It must be established who was deciding strategy, giving the orders, who was paying who and what was the real agenda?

Goncalo Amaral is a convicted criminal.  He did endeavour to pervert the cause of justice, and well before Madeleine McCann went missing.

You can all call it whatever you like, but he was already a corrupted policeman, and should never have been allowed to be involved in the case of another missing child.

[Angelo222]

Goncalo Amaral is a convicted criminal.  He did endeavour to pervert the cause of justice, and well before Madeleine McCann went missing.

You can all call it whatever you like, but he was already a corrupted policeman, and should never have been allowed to be involved in the case of another missing child.

Goncalo Amaral was the officer in charge and according to at least two Portuguese lawyers an attempt was made by Correia to subvert and undermine that authority.  That is the issue here, who brought Correia in and what was his brief?

Spanish detective agency Metodo 3 didn't just decide to get involved with Correia and Cipriano for the love of them. Someone had to have approached the Spaniards and given them specific orders to get Amaral.

[G-Unit]

Goncalo Amaral is a convicted criminal.  He did endeavour to pervert the cause of justice, and well before Madeleine McCann went missing.

You can all call it whatever you like, but he was already a corrupted policeman, and should never have been allowed to be involved in the case of another missing child.

Amaral, Amaral, Amaral, the gift that keeps on giving. How fortunate that he existed. He made a mistake abd cab therefore be blamed for everything.

Of course he wasn't working in isolation, he was part of a team whose work and conclusions were overseen by Encarnacao and the prosecutor's office, so whatever he thought and whatever he wanted to do could only be achieved with their agreement and permission.