Método 3, Marcos Aragão Correia and the campaign to discredit Gonçalo Amaral.

[jassi]

Assuming the files that were released were released to justify Amaral's position, even from the 17% that we have, it still doesn't look rosy for the PJ.  I can't wait till the whole file is released so we can have a balanced look of their entire investigation.

Why should anyone assume that?

Do you think full release of files at all likely?

[Robittybob1]

Why should anyone assume that?

Do you think full release of files at all likely?

I assume it because it would be human nature to justify your own position at the expense of the opposition.
Do I think full release of files at all likely?  Probably not but maybe it could be the next step in a very bizarre case.

[jassi]

I assume it because it would be human nature to justify your own position at the expense of the opposition.
Do I think full release of files at all likely?  Probably not but maybe it could be the next step in a very bizarre case.

Are you suggesting that Amaral had control of release of these files?

[Robittybob1]

Are you suggesting that Amaral had control of release of these files?

I'm not sure to be honest, but the file would justify the Portuguese position at least.

[jassi]

So do you have anything to support this, or is it just wild speculation on your part?

[slartibartfast]

Can we get somewhere close to the topic please. Don't want to have to cleaning up.

[Alice Purjorick]

I don't know what happened either but
After 10 years the stents have not been arrested and there is nothing to suggest the police suspect them of any crime
On the balance of probabilities they are not criminally involved in Maddies disappearance
As the archiving report discounted woke and wandered that leaves abduction
It is as simple as that

All the evidence is yet to be weighed. You and Alfie are both prejudging on the one hand whilst on the other purporting to be of above average intelligence ................................ &%+((£
It's a matter of methodology and principle not someones surname.

[ShiningInLuz]

It is also clear that the McCanns have no case to answer.

I agree that it says there is nothing to charge the McCanns with, whether neglect or worse.

But it left the status of the case as undetermined, as in not determined.

Is it possible we could return to the thread title?  Please?

[Alice Purjorick]

Cop out.

Which bit of "I don't know and neither do you" did you fail to understand ?
If you are as bright as you purport to be you should be able to work it out; it is hardly as complicated as curly dees now is it?. If you can't work it out you are dim if you can then one must assume you are here for the same reasons for which you enjoy accusing and denigrating others of on here, to whit:  to wum and troll.

[Alice Purjorick]

Assuming the files that were released were released to justify Amaral's position, even from the 17% that we have, it still doesn't look rosy for the PJ.  I can't wait till the whole file is released so we can have a balanced look of their entire investigation.

I'd rather have a gin sling and watch my lawns grow.

[stephen25000]

I agree that it says there is nothing to charge the McCanns with, whether neglect or worse.

But it left the status of the case as undetermined, as in not determined.

Is it possible we could return to the thread title?  Please?

ferryman does not wish to refer to the thread title.

[Mr Gray]

I agree that it says there is nothing to charge the McCanns with, whether neglect or worse.

But it left the status of the case as undetermined, as in not determined.

Is it possible we could return to the thread title?  Please?

Yes the thread title
Is there any evidence to support it
I say no
So lease produce it

[stephen25000]

Here we go again....

 %&5%£ %&5%£ %&5%£

[Mr Gray]

All the evidence is yet to be weighed. You and Alfie are both prejudging on the one hand whilst on the other purporting to be of above average intelligence ................................ &%+((£
It's a matter of methodology and principle not someones surname.

I'm weighing it on the available evidence
Ten years and not a sign that there is evidence to incriminate the parents
That is highly significant evidentially
Unlike the dog alerts

[Mr Gray]

Here we go again....

 %&5%£ %&5%£ %&5%£

Nothing worthwhile to say as usual